Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Review

Main Article Content

Cruz García Lirios corresponding author
Jorge Hernández Valdés
Margarita Juárez Nájera

Abstract

Meta-analytic studies are distinguished by comparing literature that reports positive effects with respect to literature that warns of spurious or negative effects. The aim of the present work was to establish the proportion of probabilities between categories and subcategories extracted from the consulted, updated and specialized literature. A documentary study was carried out with a selection of sources indexed to international repositories such as Copernicus, Dialnet, Ebsco, Latindex, Redalyc, Scielo. An indistinct scenario was found, even though the literature that reports positive effects on the quality of life and the subjective well-being of public health services prevails; suggesting the extension of the work to repositories like WOS and Scopus.

Keywords
Covid-19, social work, biopolitics, intervention, social welfare

Article Details

How to Cite
Lirios, C., Valdés, J., & Nájera, M. (2021). Review of social services on the vulnerable population in the Covid-19 era. Social Work and Social Welfare, 4(1), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2022.01.001

References

  1. Llamas B, Nava S and Garcia C. Specification of a model of adherence to treatment. Ajayu, 2019, 17(1): 140-160.
  2. Martínez E, Sánchez A and García C. Governance of quality of life and wellbeing subjective. Ajayu, 2019, 17 (1): 121-139.
  3. Foucault M. Hermeneutics of the subject. Madrid: The Pickaxe, 1987.
  4. Garcia C. Dimensions of human development theory. Ehquidad, 2019,11:27-57. https://doi.org/10.15257/ehquidad.2019.0002
  5. Sánchez A, García C, Juarez, M, et al. Effects of corporate governance policies on the quality of technological life. International Journal of Innovative Technology, 2019, 10(10): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23394.58561
  6. Lopez S, Vilchis FJ, Delgado MA, et al. Specified model base on meaning related to climate and the institutional norm of workers in health center in Mexico. Ehquidad, 2019, 11: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.15257/ehquidad.2019.0001
  7. Foucault M. The archeology of knowledge. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2002.
  8. Foucault M. Watch and punish. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2003.
  9. Rincón RM, Quintero ML, Coss J, et al. Meta Analityc Algorithm Structure of the Mobility Habitus. International Journal of Scientific Research, 2019,1(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11515.36644
  10. Foucault M. Birth of biopolitics. Mexico: FCE, 2007.
  11. Morales ML and Garcia C. Exploratory factorial modelling of the sanitary habitus. Annals of Heath, 2019, 1(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10545.43365
  12. Ribeiro M, Lopez R and Mancinas S. Social work and social policy in Mexico. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2007, 17(2): 175-200.
  13. López E and Chaparro M. Labor competences of the social worker seen from the labor market. Tabula Rasa, 2006, 5: 261-293.
  14. Abreu MA. Social health work in primary health care. Nursing,2009,3 (2):70-79.
  15. Carballeda AJ. The intervention in the social, exclusion and integration in the new social scenarios. Buenos Aires: Paid´os. 2004.
  16. Carballeda AJ. Social Work from a historical perspective focused on intervention. From the order of bodies to the outbreak of society. Buenos Aires: Paid´os. 2006.
  17. Carballeda AJ. The fragmented bodies. Social intervention in the scenarios of exclusion and disenchantment. Buenos Aires: Paid´os. 2008.
  18. Carreon J, Quintero ML, Molina HD, et al. Exploratory factor structure of the intention to migrate. Social Work Today, 2019, 87(1): 1-5.