Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Social work organizations’ initiatives towards community empowerment among rural migrant workers in Xiamen, China

Main Article Content

Shanshan Hong corresponding author

Abstract

Social work organizations (SWOs) are under rapid development in Mainland China, and they are characterized as both non-government organizations (NGOs)' features and Chinese features. This research investigates SWOs' capacity to develop community empowerment through a case study on two SWOs in Xiamen China. The study found that SWOs organized individual activities, family activities, group activities, and community activities; their community empowerment strategies are soft and modified in the Chinese practical environment and political background; SWOs' empowerment approach emphasizes personal empowerment but not organizational or institutional empowerment; SWOs' interventions are not that successful but are still under development towards community empowerment with their path, and their over-dependence on government leads to their sluggish promotion in community empowerment. The study suggests that SWOs in China should change their development strategies, diversify their funding sources, and explore their professional methods to develop equal connections with other organizations, especially governmental departments. It is necessary to re-conceptualize the definition of community empowerment in China. 

Keywords
social work organization, China, community empowerment, rural migrant workers

Article Details

Supporting Agencies
This work was funded by the ``Fujian Innovation Strategy Research Program'' (Social organizations' strategies on cultivating social capital in Fujian rural areas under rural revitalization 2022R0051).
How to Cite
Hong, S. (2022). Social work organizations’ initiatives towards community empowerment among rural migrant workers in Xiamen, China. Social Work and Social Welfare, 4(2), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2022.02.002

References

  1. Ma HB. The problems and solutions to the governance structure of newly founded social work organizations. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2012, 27(1): 29-38.
  2. Tan L and Cao FY. The research on the development of social work organizations in Shanghai: function, path and status. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social science edition), 2013, 12(6): 12-15.
  3. Zhu JG and Chen AN. NGOlization of SocialWork Institute: An Alternative Professionalization of Social Work. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2014, 29: 28-37.
  4. Clarke G. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and politics in the developing world. Political studies, 1998, 46(1): 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00128
  5. Lewis D and Kanji N. Non-governmental organizations and development. Routledge, London, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877074
  6. Lee QJ. ChineseNGOs: Challenge sand Responses. World Economics and Politics, 2008, 9: 74-80.
  7. Luo Y. Professionalism and Empowerment: Autonomy of Social Work Organizations in Cooperation with Government. Social Construction, 2019, 6: 37-42.
  8. Chen BL. A Research of Dilemma and Solution of Social Work Institutions in Shanghai. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 2011, 4: 27-31.
  9. Xiao XX and Zhang XJ. Analysis of social work organizations’ development path and operating difficulties. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2012, 5: 117-123.
  10. Clarke J. Democratising Development: The role of Voluntary Organisations. Earthscan, London, 1991.
  11. Galjart C. Counter-development:possibilities and constraints. Craig, G., & Mayo, M. (Eds.). Community empowerment: A reader in participation and development. Zed Books, 1995.
  12. Jing YJ. Control and empowerment: Chinese government’s social organization development strategies. Academia Bimestrie, 2016, 1: 22-33.
  13. Yang YF and Ma LC. Synergy empowerment:a interpretive famework of social organization participation– a look into NZ recovering service project. Fujian luntan, 2017, 3: 80-86.
  14. Zhou J and Zhao XC. People-oriented organizational empowerment: social organization’s function in helping clients. Study and Practice, 2022, 1: 98-108.
  15. Laverack G and Wallerstein N. Measuring community empowerment: a fresh look at organizational domains. Health promotion international, 2001, 16(2): 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/16.2.179
  16. Laverack G. Using a ‘domains’ approach to build community empowerment. Community Development Journal, 2005, 41(1): 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi038
  17. Yin RK. Case study research: research design and methods. UK: Sage Publications, 2014.
  18. Islam MR and Morgan WJ. Non-governmental organizations in Bangladesh: their contribution to social capital development and community empowerment. Community Development Journal, 2012, 47(3): 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsr024
  19. Islam MR. Agents of community empowerment? The possibilities and limitations of non-governmental organizations in Bangladesh. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 2012, 4: 703-725.
  20. Rahmawati DE and Astuti DW. NGO and Community Empowerment Based on Local Wisdom (a Case Study of Spedagi NGO in Temanggung, Central Java, 2018-2019). Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 2019, 6(3): 293-306. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.63114
  21. Chen F and Hou TJ. The paradox of government purchase of services: an observation on the participation of social organizations in community governance. Beijing Cultural Review, 2020, 111-143.
  22. Xu Y. A comparative study of two types of labor service organizations: from an empowerment perspective. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social science edition), 2014, 29(1): 38-46.
  23. Pfeffer J and Salancik GR. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. The Economic Journal, 1979, 89(356): 969-970. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231527
  24. Xu XL and Peng HM. Resource and power: social work organization development modal during multiinteraction. Inner Mongolia Social Science, 2015, 36(5): 177-184.