Open Access Peer-reviewed Review

Difference of rainfall-runoff models and effect on flood forecasting: A brief review

Main Article Content

Safieh Javadinejad corresponding author
Rebwar Dara
Forough Jafary

Abstract

Selecting a rainfall-runoff model for use in flood forecasting is not a direct decision and actually may contain the selection of more than one. There are a range of rainfall-runoff models for flow forecasting. They range in type from transfer function (empirical black box), through lumped conceptual to more physically-based distributed models. The rainfall-runoff models also are often accompanied by updating techniques for taking account of recent measurements of flow so as to improve the accuracy of model predictions in real-time. Against this variety of available modelling techniques, this study improved understanding of the most important and well known rainfall-runoff models for flood forecasting and highlighting their similarities and differences. Six models are selected in this study: the Probability Distributed Moisture (PDM) model, the Isolated Event Model (IEM), the US National Weather Service Sacramento model, the Grid Model, the Transfer Function (TF) model and the Physically Realisable Transfer Function (PRTF) model. The first three are conceptual soil moisture accounting models, with the Grid Model having a distributed formulation, whilst the TF and PRTF are “black box” time-series models. Also new model for the forecasting (e.g neural network (NN), fuzzy rule-based are reviewed. An important feature of the use of rainfall-runoff models in a real-time forecasting environment is the ability to integrate recent observations of flow in order to develop forecast performance. The available methods for forecast updating are reviewed with specific reference to state correction and error prediction techniques.

Keywords
rainfall-runoff model, flood forecasting, soil moisture

Article Details

How to Cite
Javadinejad, S., Dara, R., & Jafary, F. (2022). Difference of rainfall-runoff models and effect on flood forecasting: A brief review. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 4(1), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.25082/REIE.2022.01.003

References

  1. Saber M, Sefelnasr A and Yilmaz KK. December. Flash Floods Simulation Using a Physical based hydrological Model at the Eastern Nile Basin: Case studies; Wadi Assiut, Egypt and Wadi Gumara, Lake Tana, Ethiopia. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2015.
  2. Masseroni D, Cislaghi A, Camici S, et al. A reliable rainfall-runoff model for flood forecasting: review and application to a semi-urbanized watershed at high flood risk in Italy. Hydrology Research, 2017, 48(3): 726-740. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.037
  3. Talchabhadel R, Shakya NM, Dahal V, et al. Rainfall Runoff Modelling for Flood Forecasting (A Case Study on West Rapti Watershed). Journal of Flood Engineering, 2015, 6(1): 53-61.
  4. Yucel I, Onen A, Yilmaz KK, et al. Calibration and evaluation of a flood forecasting system: Utility of numerical weather prediction model, data assimilation and satellite-based rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 523: 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.042
  5. Fan FM, Collischonn W, Quiroz KJ, et al. Flood forecasting on the Tocantins River using ensemble rainfall forecasts and real‐time satellite rainfall estimates. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2016, 9(3): 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12177
  6. Nanda T, Sahoo B, Beria H, et al. A wavelet-based non-linear autoregressive with exogenous inputs (WNARX) dynamic neural network model for real-time flood forecasting using satellite-based rainfall products. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 539: 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.014
  7. Taormina R and Chau KW. Data-driven input variable selection for rainfall-runoff modeling using binary-coded particle swarm optimization and extreme learning machines. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 529: 1617-1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.022
  8. Javadinejad S, Hannah D, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, et al. The impact of future climate change and human activities on hydro-climatological drought, analysis and projections: using CMIP5 climate model simulations. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 2019, 4(2-3): 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00069-2
  9. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Health impacts of extreme events. Safety in Extreme Environments, 2020, 2(2): 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42797-020-00016-8
  10. Javadinejad S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Singh VP, et al. Reliable, Resilient, and Sustainable Water Management in Different Water Use Sectors. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 2019, 4(2-3): 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00073-6
  11. Javadinejad S, Eslamian S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, et al. Relationship Between Climate Change, Natural Disaster, and Resilience in Rural and Urban Societies, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93336-8_189
  12. Javadinejad(5), S., (2016). Vulnerability of water resources to climate change and human impact: scenario analysis of the Zayandeh Rud river basin in Iran (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
  13. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Climate Change Scenarios and Effects on Snow-Melt Runoff. Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 6(9): 1715-1725. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091577
  14. Javadinejad S and Jafary RDF. Effect of Precipitation Characteristics on Spatial and Temporal Varia-tions of Landslide in Kermanshah Province in Iran. Journal of Geographical Research, 2019, 2(4): 7-14. https://doi.org/10.30564/jgr.v2i4.1818
  15. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Potential impact of climate change on temperature and humidity related human health effects during extreme condition. Safety in Extreme Environments, 2020, 2(2): 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42797-020-00021-x
  16. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Analysis and prioritization the effective factors on increasing farmers resilience under climate change and drought. Agricultural research, 2020, 10: 497-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00516-w
  17. Javadinejad S, Mariwan RDMHH, Hamah A, et al. Analysis of Gray Water Recycling by Reuse of Industrial Waste Water for Agricultural and Irrigation Purposes. Journal of Geographical Research, 2020, 3(2): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.30564/jgr.v3i2.2056
  18. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Impacts of Extreme Events on Water Availability. Annals of Geographical Studies, 2019, 2(3): 16-24.
  19. Javadinejad S and Jafary RDF. Gray Water Measurement and Feasibility of Retrieval Using Innova-tive Technology and Application in Water Resources Management in Isfahan-Iran. Journal of Geographical Research, 2020, 3(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.30564/jgr.v3i2.1997
  20. Javadinejad S, Eslamian S and Ostad-Ali-Askari K. Investigation of monthly and seasonal changes of methane gas with respect to climate change using satellite data. Applied Water Science, 2019, 9(8): 180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1067-9
  21. Javadinejad S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K and Eslamian S. Application of Multi-Index Decision Analysis to Management Scenarios Considering Climate Change Prediction in the Zayandeh Rud River Basin. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 2019, 4(1): 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00068-3
  22. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Taking Urgent Actions to Combat Climate Change Impacts. Annals of Geographical Studies, 2019, 2(4): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10315508
  23. Javadinejad S, Eslamian S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, et al. Embankments. In: Bobrowsky P., Marker B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Cham, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_105-1
  24. Javadinejad S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K and Jafary F. Using simulation model to determine the regulation and to optimize the quantity of chlorine injection in water distribution networks. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2019, 5(3): 1015-1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00587-x
  25. Javadinejad S, Eslamian S and Askari K. The analysis of the most important climatic parameters affecting performance of crop variability in a changing climate. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 2021, 11(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2021.112651
  26. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Evaluation of hydro-meteorological drought indices for characterizing historical and future droughts and their impact on groundwater. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 2020, 2(1): 71-83. https://doi.org/10.25082/REIE.2020.01.003
  27. Javadinejad S. The 2008 Morpeth Flood: Continuous Simulation Model for the Wansbeck Catchment. Ebook, Grin publication, 2011.
  28. Mirramazani SM, Javadinejad S, Eslamian S, et al. The Origin of River Sediments, The Associated Dust and Climate Change. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2017, 8(2): 149-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_105-1
  29. Mirramazani SM, Javadinejad S, Eslamian S, et al. A Feasibility Study of Urban Green Space Design in the Form of Smart Arid Landscaping with Rainwater Harvesting. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2018, 201: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.201.1-9
  30. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Modelling groundwater level fluctuation in an Indian coastal aquifer. Water SA, 2020, 46(4): 665-671. https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2020.v46.i4.9081
  31. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Investigation of the effect of climate change on heat waves. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 2020, 2(1): 54-60. https://doi.org/10.25082/REIE.2020.01.001
  32. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Examining the association between dust and sediment and evaluating the impact of climate change on dust and providing adaptation. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 2020, 2(1): 61-70. https://doi.org/10.25082/REIE.2020.01.002
  33. Javadinejad S, Dara R, Jafary F, et al. Climate change management strategies to handle and cope with extreme weather and climate events. Journal of Geographical Research, 2020, 3(4): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.30564/jgr.v3i4.2324
  34. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. How groundwater level can predict under the effect of climate change by using artificial neural networks of NARX. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 2020, 2(1): 90-99. https://doi.org/10.25082/REIE.2020.01.005
  35. Javadinejad S, Hannah DH, Krause SK, et al. The Impacts of Climate Change on Energy-Water Systems and Economic Analysisthe Impacts of Climate Change on Energy-Water Systems and Economic Analysis. The Iraqi Geological Journal, 2020, 53(2F): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.53.2F.1Ms-2020-12-24
  36. Javadinejad S, Hannah D, Krause S, et al. Building socio-hydrological resilience ``improving capacity for building a socio hydrological system resilience''. Safety in Extreme Environments, 2020, 2(3): 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42797-020-00024-8
  37. Javadinejad S, Dara R, Jafary F, et al. A Review on Homogeneity across Hydrological Regions. Biogeneric Science and Research, 2021, 7(4): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.46718/JBGSR.2021.07.000173
  38. Dara R, Jirjees S, Fatah K, et al. Climatic Parameters Analysis of Koysinjaq Meteorological Station, Kurdistan Region, Northern Iraq, 2021. Iraqi Geological Journal, 54(1A): 99-109 https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.54.1A.9Ms-2021-01-30
  39. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Droughts and the Impacts of Dry Spells in North of Iraq. Research in Ecology, 2021, 3(1): 59-69. https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v3i1.2865
  40. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Climate change simulation and impacts on extreme events of rainfall and storm water in the Zayandeh Rud Catchment. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 2021, 3(1): 100-110. https://doi.org/10.25082/REIE.2021.01.001
  41. Javadinejad S, Rebwar D and Forough J. Examining the Association Between Dust and Sediment and Evaluating the Impact of Climate Change on Dust and Providing Adaptation. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 2020, 2(1): 61-70. https://doi.org/10.25082/REIE.2020.01.002
  42. Safieh J, Rebwar D and Hamed MH. Investigation of water quality in wet and dry seasons under climate change. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2020, 10(5): 94-104. https://doi.org/10.15421/2020_212
  43. Javadinejad S, Dara R and Jafary F. Investigation of the effect of climate change on heat waves. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 2020, 2(1):54-60. https://doi.org/10.25082/REIE.2020.01.001
  44. Javadinejad S, Dara R, Jafary F, et al. Modeling the Effects of Climate Change on Probability of Maximum Rainfall and On Variations in Storm Water in the Zayandeh Rud River. Biogeneric Science and Research, 2021, 7(4): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.46718/JBGSR.2021.07.000174
  45. Bogner K, Liechti K and Zappa M. Error Correcting and Combining Multi-model Flood Forecasting Systems. In Advances in Hydroinformatics (pp. 569-578). Springer, Singapore, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7218-5_40
  46. Kauffeldt A, Wetterhall F, Pappenberger F, et al. Technical review of large-scale hydrological models for implementation in operational flood forecasting schemes on continental level. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 75: 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.09.009
  47. Alvarez-Garreton C, Ryu D, Western AW, et al. The impacts of assimilating satellite soil moisture into a rainfall-runoff model in a semi-arid catchment. Journal of hydrology, 2014, 519: 2763-2774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.041
  48. Revilla-Romero B, Beck HE, Burek P, et al. Filling the gaps: Calibrating a rainfall-runoff model using satellite-derived surface water extent. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 171: 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.022
  49. Taormina R and Chau KW. Data-driven input variable selection for rainfall-runoff modeling using binary-coded particle swarm optimization and extreme learning machines. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 529: 1617-1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.022
  50. Chang FJ, Chiang YM and Ho YH. Multistep‐ahead flood forecasts by neuro‐fuzzy networks with effective rainfall-run‐off patterns. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2015, 8(3): 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12089
  51. Reynolds JE, Halldin S, Xu CY, et al. Sub-daily runoff predictions using parameters calibrated on the basis of data with a daily temporal resolution. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 550: 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.012
  52. Meng S, Xie X and Liang S. Assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow observations to improve flood forecasting with considering runoff routing lags. Journal of hydrology, 2017, 550: 568-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.024
  53. Liu J, Wang J, Pan S, et al. A real-time flood forecasting system with dual updating of the NWP rainfall and the river flow. Natural Hazards, 2015, 77(2): 1161-1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1643-8
  54. Ciabatta L, Brocca L, Massari C, et al. Rainfall-runoff modelling by using SM2RAIN-derived and state-of-the-art satellite rainfall products over Italy. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2016, 48: 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.10.004