Open Access Peer-reviewed Commentary

Aspects of information and spiritual similarity of real and virtual spaces

Main Article Content

Evgeniy Bryndin corresponding author

Abstract

The results of numerous studies demonstrate the possibility of using the same approaches to studying real and virtual space in the context of their spatial perception. The study of virtual space can be carried out using the same parameters as physical space, and they should be considered equivalent. Virtual space is only one of the strategies for information copying of real space, the result of an irresistible human need to expand the horizons of research. Virtual space does not pose any threat to reality if we interpret the virtual environment as a transformation of the real environment, a new way of studying the mutual penetration of the virtual and real worlds. Learning to navigate in virtual space leads to safer life in real space.

Keywords
spatial perception, virtual environment, information field

Article Details

How to Cite
Bryndin, E. (2024). Aspects of information and spiritual similarity of real and virtual spaces. Research on Intelligent Manufacturing and Assembly, 3(1), 94-99. https://doi.org/10.25082/RIMA.2024.01.001

References

  1. Chrastil ER, Sherrill KR, Hasselmo ME, et al. There and Back Again: Hippocampus and Retrosplenial Cortex Track Homing Distance during Human Path Integration. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2015, 35(46): 15442-15452. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1209-15.2015
  2. Moser MB, Rowland DC, Moser EI. Place Cells, Grid Cells, and Memory. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2015, 7(2): a021808. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021808
  3. Huffman DJ, Ekstrom AD. A Modality-Independent Network Underlies the Retrieval of Large-Scale Spatial Environments in the Human Brain. Neuron. 2019, 104(3): 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.012
  4. Clemenson GD, Wang L, Mao Z, et al. Exploring the Spatial Relationships Between Real and Virtual Experiences: What Transfers and What Doesn’t. Frontiers in Virtual Reality. 2020, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.572122
  5. Melik-Gaikazyan IV. Information processes and reality. Moscow: Science, Fizmatlit, 1997.
  6. Melik-Gaikazyan IV. The impact of a changing world as an information process. Man. 2007, 3: 32-43.
  7. Vernadsky VI. Biosphere and noosphere. EKSMO. 2023. ISBN 9785041859015.
  8. Kalitniy. The consciousness of the Absolute was the first organizing factor. https://sestrasveta.narod.ru/1.htm
  9. Imhotep. Consciousness as a factor organizing space. https:://sestrasveta.narod.ru
  10. Barbour J. The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics. Oxford University Press. 2021: 371.
  11. Bryndin E. Information Essence of Spiritual Substance and Universe and Man in Cosmology. Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences Research. Published online February 28, 2022: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.47363/jeesr/2022(4)163
  12. Bryndin E. Modeling of creative and professional activities by ensembles of intellectual agents based on live information. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Mechatronics (IJAIM). 2022, 10(4): 44-50.
  13. Bryndin E. Cognitive Resonant Communication by Internal Speech Through Ethereal Medium at Level of Gravitational Waves. Journal of Progress in Engineering and Physical Science. 2023, 2(4): 44-53. https://doi.org/10.56397/jpeps.2023.12.07
  14. Bryndin EG. Formation and development of scientific knowledge and research before the use of natural technologies. Yearbook ``Greater Eurasia: Development, Security, Cooperation". Moscow: INION RAS. 2024, 7(2): 592-595.
  15. Bryndin EG. Noospheric Natural Technology of Interpersonal Communication. Problematic and noospheric approaches to the development of creative interpersonal relations of participants in the modern educational process. Proceedings of the XXIV Moscow International Conference "Education in the XXI century -- through the eyes of children and adults". Moscow: Publishing House ``Sputnik +", 2024. In press.
  16. Bryndin E. Creation of Multi-purpose Intelligent Multimodal Self-Organizing Safe Robotic Ensembles Agents with AGI and cognitive control. COJ Robotics & Artificial Intelligence (COJRA). 2024, 3(5): 1-10.
  17. Bryndin E. Creation of multimodal digital twins with reflexive AGI multilogic and multisensory. Research on Intelligent Manufacturing and Assembly. 2024, 2(1): 85-93. https://doi.org/10.25082/rima.2023.01.005