Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Main Article Content

Yulin Tong corresponding author
Jian Li

Abstract

Purpose: With the rapid growth of volunteering in worldwide, the question of how to recognize volunteers at the national level to motivate volunteering has become a pressing matter. In a few of developed nations, volunteering is motivated by the establishment of national recognition awards for volunteer. As a result, the goal of this paper is to aid decision-makers in enhancing volunteering by drawing on the experience of these developed countries.
Methods: This paper adopts a literature-based approach and presents a comparative analysis of national recognition awards for volunteer in the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Canada, and Ireland. The comparison factors include the objectives of awards, categorization criteria, eligibility prerequisites, nomination requirements, and the evaluation process. Following that, an examination of similarities and differences between the awards will be presented, and the article will end with some suggestions.
Results: Each of these four countries has established standardized and effective criteria for volunteers’ recognition awards, despite that each country's practices vary to some extent. Based on these circumstances, nations conscious of the importance of volunteer recognition which should expedite the establishment of national recognition awards for volunteers, broaden participation, focus on the effectiveness of service, establish reasonable application standards while ensuring the transparency of the selection process, and actively seek to expand cooperation with other social organizations.

Keywords
volunteering, volunteer motivation, volunteer recognition, motivation theories, recognition models

Article Details

How to Cite
Tong, Y., & Li, J. (2022). How do developed countries motivate volunteering: A comparative analysis of national recognition awards for volunteers in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, and Ireland. Social Work and Social Welfare, 4(2), 252-262. https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2022.02.005

References

  1. Wilson J. Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 2000, 26: 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215
  2. The State Council of the People's Republic of China, Regulation on Volunteer Services, viewed September 06, 2017. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-09/06/content_5223028.htm
  3. CAF WORLD GIVING INDEX 2021, n.d., viewed March 15, 2022. https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-research/cafworldgivingindex2021_report_web2_100621.pdf
  4. Kwarteng JA. Ohio 4-H Agents' and Volunteer Leaders' Perceptions of the Volunteer Leadership Development Program. Journal of the American Association of Teacher Educators in Agriculture, 1988, 29(2): 55-62.
  5. Jung J. The effects of recognition on volunteer activities in Korea: Does it really matter?. International Review of Public Administration, 2011, 16(2): 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/12264431.2011.10805195
  6. Wright ND, Larsen V and Higgs R. Consumer Satisfaction and the marketing of volunteerism: The case of the Appalachian Mountain Housing. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, 1995, 8: 88-197.
  7. Boyce VM. A systematic approach to leadership development. Washington, DC: USDA, Extension Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED065763.), 1971.
  8. Vineyard S. Recruiting and retaining volunteers...no gimmicks, no gags!. The Journal of Volunteer Administration, 1980, 2(3): 23-28.
  9. Lenihan GO and Jackson L. Social Need, Public Response: The Volunteer Professional Model for Human Services Agencies and Counselors. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1984, 62(5): 285-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-4918.1984.tb00207.x
  10. Penrod KM. Leadership Involving Volunteers: The LOOP Model. Journal of extension, 1991, 29: 9-11.
  11. Culp K, Deppe CA, Castillo JX, et al. The GEMS model of volunteer administration. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 1998, 16: 36-41.
  12. Fisher R and Ackerman D. The Effect of Recognition and Group Need on Volunteerism: A Social Norm Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 1998, 25: 262-275. https://doi.org/10.1086/209538
  13. Brudney J and Nezhina T. What is Old is New Again: Effectiveness with Volunteer Programs in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2005, 16(3): 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-005-7726-y
  14. Yeung AB. The Octagon Model of Volunteer Motivation: Results of a Phenomenological Analysis. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2004, 15(1): 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VOLU.0000023632.89728.ff
  15. Maslow A. Motivation and Personality, 1st edn, Harper & Row, New York, 1947.
  16. Alderfer C. Existence, Relatedness, and Growth: Human Needs in Organizational Settings, Free Press, New York, 1972.
  17. Vroom V. Work and Motivation, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1964.
  18. Maslow A. Motivation and Personality, Evonston and London: Harper and Row, New York, 1970.
  19. Haslam S. Psychology in Organisations, Sage Publications, London, 2001.
  20. Statt D. Psychology and the World of Work, Macmillan, London, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23652-7
  21. Alderfer CP. An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1969, 2(4): 142-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X
  22. Caulton JR. The development and use of the theory of ERG: A literature review. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 2012, 5(1): 2-8.
  23. Kottasz R. Differences in the Donor Behavior Characteristics of Young Affluent Males and Females: Empirical Evidence From Britain. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2004, 15(2): 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VOLU.0000033180.43496.09
  24. Parijat P and Bagga S. Victor Vroom's Expectancy Theory of Motivation-An Evaluation. International Research Journal of Business and Management, 2014, 7(9): 1-8.
  25. The Queen's Award for Voluntary Service, n.d., viewed March 07, 2022. https://qavs.dcms.gov.uk
  26. Make a nomination: Eligibility, n.d., viewed April 13, 2022. https://qavs.dcms.gov.uk/make-a-nomination/eligibility
  27. Make a nomination: About nominating, n.d., viewed April 13, 2022. https://qavs.dcms.gov.uk/make-a-nomination/about-nominating
  28. The Queen's Award for Voluntary Service: Awards process, n.d., viewed April 13, 2022. https://qavs.dcms.gov.uk/awards-process
  29. About the President's Volunteer Service Award, n.d., viewed April 14, 2022. https://presidentialserviceawards.gov/about
  30. President's Volunteer Service Award: Eligibility Requirements, n.d., viewed April 14, 2022. https://presidentialserviceawards.gov/eligibility
  31. Sovereign's Medal for Volunteers: Regulations, n.d., viewed April 15, 2022. https://www.gg.ca/en/honours/canadian-honours/sovereigns-medal-volunteers/regulations
  32. Sovereign's Medal for Volunteers: Frequently Asked Questions, n.d., viewed April 15, 2022. https://www.gg.ca/en/honours/canadian-honours/sovereigns-medal-volunteers/frequently-asked-questions
  33. Volunteer Ireland Awards: About the awards, n.d., viewed April 16, 2022. https://www.volunteer.ie/events/volunteer-ireland-awards
  34. Volunteer Ireland Awards: Volunteer Ireland Award Categories, n.d., viewed April 16, 2022. https://www.volunteer.ie/events/vi-awards/volunteer-ireland-award-categories
  35. Volunteer Ireland Awards 2021 Terms and Conditions n.d., viewed April 13, 2022. https://www.volunteer.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Volunteer-Ireland-Awards-2021-Terms-and-Conditions.pdf
  36. Du P. On Modernity Transfer of Western Anthropological Research Paradigms of Rites. Journal of Northwest Minzu University, 2018, 2: 1-6.