Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Main Article Content

Juan Antonio Araiza-Aguilar
Silke Cram-Heydrich
Naxhelli Ruiz-Rivera
Oralia Oropeza-Orozco
María del Pilar Fernández-Lomelín
María Neftalí Rojas-Valencia corresponding author


Risks have been addressed from at least 5 different approaches, including environmental, health, occupational, chemical and technological standpoints, each using their own definitions, which limits the design of public policies focused on improving MSW management. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how the concept of risk is used in different investigations in the field of MSW. The factors that influence these concepts are also determined, including the spatial context of risk assessments. The search focused on 73 scientific papers from journal pages to specialized search engines, such as Google Scholar or ScienceDirect, published between 1970 and 2020. Throughout this period, many changes, mostly brought about by economic and health crises, can be seen. A significant risk increase is observed in the 1980s with a marked rebound in the early 1990s, which continues throughout the following decades. Risks increased drastically in parallel with unemployment and mortality in 2020, due to the global pandemic, which modified waste composition, since protective equipment against coronavirus was mixed with household waste.

exposure, final disposal, hazard, leachate, municipal solid waste, vulnerability

Article Details

Supporting Agencies
This project was supported by the Project Support Programme for Research and Technological Innovation (PAPIIT) (Project UNAM DGAPA-PAPIIT IN105516). We also appreciate the support of Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT) to carry out this work.
How to Cite
Araiza-Aguilar, J., Cram-Heydrich, S., Ruiz-Rivera, N., Oropeza-Orozco, O., Fernández-Lomelín, M., & Rojas-Valencia, M. (2021). Municipal solid waste and risk from 1970 to 2020. Resources Environment and Information Engineering, 3(1), 138-144.


  1. Gouveia N and Prado R. Health risks in areas close to urban solid waste landfill sites. Revista de Sa´ude P´ublica, 2010, 44: 1-8.
  2. Jiang J, Wang F and Li J. Ammonia and hydrogen sulphide odour emissions from different areas of a landfill in Hangzhou, China. Waste Management & Research, 2020, 39(2): 1-8.
  3. Palmiotto M, Fattore E, Paiano V, et al. Influence of a municipal solid waste landfill in the surrounding environment: Toxicological risk and odor nuisance effects. Environment International, 2014, 68: 16-24.
  4. Vongdala N, Tran H, Teschke R, et al. Heavy Metal Accumulation in Water, Soil, and Plants of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill in Vientiane, Laos. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(1): 1-13.
  5. Przydatek G. Multi-indicator analysis of the influence of old municipal landfill sites on the aquatic environment: case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191(773): 1-19.
  6. Kumar S, Dhar H, Nair V, et al. Environmental quality monitoring and impact assessment of solid waste dumpsites in high altitude sub-tropical regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 252: 1-9.
  7. Araiza J, Cram S, Ruiz N, et al. What does ‘risk’ mean in municipal solid waste management? Investigaciones Geogr´aficas, 2021, 1-20.
  8. Ch´avez S. The risk concept. Natural Resources and Society, 2018, 4: 32-52.
  9. Luhmann N. The risk concept. Josetxo, B (Compiler) The perverse consequences of modernity (Barcelona: Anthropos), 1996, 123-153.
  10. Marcano A and Cartaya S. Disaster risk management and the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS): Some considerations. University Journal Arbitrated of Research and Academic Dialogue, 2010, 6: 44-64.
  11. Kiryushina N, Semeykin A and Sharapov O. Assessment of environmental risk of municipal solid waste Landfill (by example of the city of Belgorod). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 687: 1-6.
  12. Kazuva E, Zhang J, Tong Z, et al. The DPSIR Model for Environmental Risk Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15: 1692.
  13. Vaverkov´a M, Elbl J, Radziemska M, et al. Environmental risk assessment and consequences of municipal solid waste disposal. Chemosphere, 2018, 208.
  14. Cangialosi F, Intini G, Liberti L, et al. Health risk assessment of air emissions from a municipal solid waste incineration plant – A case study. Waste Management, 2008, 28(5): 885-895.
  15. Rapti D, Sdao F and Masi S. Pollution risk assessment based on hydrogeological data and management of solid waste landfills. Engineering Geology, 2006, 85: 122-131.
  16. Bosque J, D´ıaz C, D´ıaz M, et al. Methodological proposal to characterize the areas exposed to technological risks through GIS. Application in the community of Madrid. GeoFocus, 2004, 4: 44-78.
  17. Butt T and Oduyemi K. A holistic approach to concentration assessment of hazards in the risk assessment of landfill leachate. Environment International, 2003, 28: 597- 608.
  18. Butt T, Clark M, Coulon F, et al. A review of literature and computer models on exposure assessment. Environmental Technology, 2009, 30: 1487-1501.
  19. Butt T, Javadi A, Nunns M, et al. Development of a conceptual framework of holistic risk assessment - Landfill as a particular type of contaminated land. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 569-570: 815-829.
  20. Butt T, Lockley E and Oduyemi K. Risk assessment of landfill disposal sites – State of the art. Waste Management, 2008, 28: 952-964.
  21. Butt T, Gouda H, Baloch M, et al. Literature review of baseline study for risk analysis — The landfill leachate case. Environment International, 2014, 63: 149-162.
  22. Durmusoglu E, Taspinar F and Karademir A. Health risk assessment of BTEX emissions in the landfill environment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 176: 870-887.
  23. Giusti L. A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. Waste Management, 2009, 29: 2227-2239.
  24. Pheby D, Grey M, Giusti L, et al. Waste management and public health: the state of the evidence -A review of the epidemiological research on the impact of waste management activities on health. (Bristol: Centre for Research in Environmental Systems, Pollution and Remediation-University of the West of England), 2002.
  25. Porta D, Milani S, Lazzarino A, et al. Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid waste. Environmental Health, 2009, 8: 1-14.
  26. Pukkala E and P¨onk¨a A. Increased incidence of cancer and asthma in houses buuilt on a former dump area. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001, 109(11): 1121-1125.
  27. Gelberg KH. Health study of New York City Department of Sanitation landfill employees. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1997, 39: 1103-1110.
  28. Ivens U, Hansen J, Breum N, et al. Diarrhoea among waste collectors associated with bioaerosol exposure. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 1997, 4: 63-68.
  29. Ivens U, Breum N, Ebbehøj N, et al. Exposure-response relationship between gastrointestinal problems among waste collectors and bioaerosol exposure. Scandinavian Journal ofWork, Environment & Health, 1999, 25: 238-245.
  30. Radin J. Health and safety in the solid waste industry. American Journal Public Health, 1975, 65: 38-46.
  31. Jayakrishnan T, Cherumanalil M and Bhaskar R. Occupational health problems of municipal solid waste management workers in India. International Journal of Environmental Health Enginnering, 2013, 2: 1-6.
  32. Rendleman N and Feldstein A. Occupational injuries among urban recyclers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1997, 39: 672-675.
  33. Jerie S. Occupational Risks Associated with Solid Waste Management in the Informal Sector of Gweru, Zimbabwe. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2016, 2016: 1-14.
  34. Emmatty F and Panicker V. Ergonomic interventions among waste collection workers: A systematic review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2019, 72: 158-172.
  35. Uddin S and Gutberlet J. Livelihoods and health status of informal recyclers in Mongolia. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2018, 134: 1-9.
  36. Bosque J, D´ıaz M and D´ıaz C. From space justice to environmental justice in the policy of locating facilities for waste management in the Community of Madrid. Bulletin of the Royal Geographical Society, 2002, 37-38: 89-114.
  37. Gonz´alez D. Cartography of exposure to technological risks through atmospheric dispersion models and wind maps, (thesis), School of Architecture and Geodesy, Engineering in Geodesy and Cartography, University of Alcal´a, Alcal´a de Henares, Spain, 2006.
  38. D´ıaz M and D´ıaz C. The analysis of vulnerability in the mapping of technological risks: some conceptual and methodological issues. Geographic Series 2001-2002, 2002, 10: 27-41.
  39. Daskalopoulos E, Badr O and Probert S. Economic and environmental evaluations of waste treatment and disposal technologies for municipal solid waste. Applied Energy, 1997, 58: 209-255.
  40. El-Fadel M, Findikakis A and Leckie J. Environmental Impacts of Solid Waste Landfilling. Journal of Environmental Management, 1997, 50: 1-25.
  41. Hamer G. Solid waste treatment and disposal: effects on public health and environmental safety. Biotechnology Advances, 2003, 22: 71-79.
  42. Kiss G and Encarnaci´on G. The products and the impacts of the decomposition of urban solid waste in the final disposal sites. Ecological Gazette, 2006, 79: 39-51.
  43. Rabl A, Spadaro J and Zoughaib A. Environmental impacts and costs of solid waste: a comparison of landfill and incineration. Waste Management & Research, 2008, 26: 147-162.
  44. Salas J and Quesada H. Environmental impact of ordinary solid waste management in a rural community. Tecnolog´ıa en Marcha, 2006, 19: 9-16.
  45. Mosquera G, Canchingre M and Morales M. Evaluation of the environmental impacts generated by the solid waste landfill of Atcacame canton, Ecuador. Santiago Journal, 2014, 134: 500-513.
  46. Burton I and Kates W. The perception of natural hazards in resource management. Natural Resources Journal, 1964, 3: 412-441.
  47. White G. Natural Hazards Research. In: R. Chorley (Ed.) Directions in Geography (London: Methuen), 1973: 193-216.
  48. UNDRO. Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis: Report of Expert Group Meeting (9-12 July 1979) (Geneva, Switzerland: Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator), 1979.
  49. Quarantelli E. Disaster Studies: An analysis of the social historical factor affecting the development of research in the area. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1987, 5: 285-310.
  50. Quarantelli E. What Is a Disaster?, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1995, 13: 221-229.
  51. Quarantelli E. What is a Disaster?: Perspectives on the Question (London: Routledge), 1998.
  52. Maskrey A. Disaster mitigation: A community based approach (Oxford: Oxfam), 1989.
  53. OJF, Official Journal of the Federation, 2014, General law for the prevention and integral management of waste. Official Journal of the Federation, Mexico, October 8, 2003, with the latest reform published in the OJF 04-06-2014.
  54. USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1976, Solid waste disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901-6992k). U.S. Congress.
  55. EA, Environment Agency, 2003, Procedure for identifying risks from landfills Version 1.2 (Bristol: Environment Agency).
  56. EA, Environment Agency, 2004, Guidance on assessment of risks from landfill sites, version 1.0 (Bristol: Environment Agency).
  57. IEEPA, Ireland Environmental Protection Agency, 2007, Code of practice- environmental risk Assessment for unregulated waste disposal sites (Wexford: Environmental Protection Agency).
  58. USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1989, Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I. Human health evaluation (Part A)- EPA/540/1-89/002 (Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum).
  59. USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1992, Guidelines for exposure assessment- EPA/600/Z-92/001 (Washington, Dc: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum).
  60. USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993, Wildlife exposure factors handbook volumes I & II- EPA/600/R-93/187 (Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency).
  61. OPS, Pan-american Health Organization, 1999, Methodology of Identification and evaluation of health risks in contaminated sites - OPS/CEPIS/Pub/99.34 (Lima: Pan American Center for Sanitary Engineering and Environmental Sciences - Pan American Health Organization).
  62. Espinosa M, L´opez M, Pell´on A, et al. Analysis of the behavior of leachates from a municipal solid wastes landfill of Havana City, Cuba. International Journal of Environmental Pollution, 2010, 26: 313-325.
  63. Chen C, Tu C, Chen S, et al. Simulation of groundwater contaminant transport at a decommissioned landfill site-a case study, Tainan City, Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, 13: 1-22.
  64. Araiza J and Rojas M. Spatial modelling of gaseous emissions from two municipal solid waste dump sites. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2019, 76: 213-224.
  65. Ilizaliturri C, Gonz´alez D, Pelallo N, et al. Review of methodologies on health risk assessment for the study of vulnerable communities in Latin America. Interciencia: Journal of Science and Technology of America, 2009, 34: 710-717.
  66. Apaza E. Study of generation of domestic dangerous residuals in a residence area. Environmental Journal: Water, Air and Soil, 2006, 1: 24-33.
  67. Favela H, Ojeda S and Lozano G. Quantification of hazardous domestic solid waste generated in two seasonal periods in a Mexican city. Presented at the II Ibero-American Symposium on Waste Engineering, Barranquilla, Colombia, 24-25 September. Digital version, 2009.
  68. Salda˜na C, Hern´andez I, Messina S, et al. Physical characterization of municipal solid waste and the added value of recoverable materials in the Iztete landfill, in Tepic-Nayarit, Mexico. International Journal of Environmental Pollution, 2013, 29: 25-32.
  69. Castillo E and De Medina L. Generation and composition of household solid waste in small urban localities in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. International Journal of Environmental Pollution, 2014, 30: 81-90.
  70. Araiza J, Ch´avez J and Moreno J. Quantification of municipal solid waste generated in the municipal seat of Berriozabal, Chiapas. International Journal of Environmental Pollution, 2017, 33: 691-699.
  71. Araiza J, Ch´avez J, Moreno J, et al. Municipal solid waste management in a municipality of Chiapas, Mexico. Social Sciences, 2017, 6: 133-140.
  72. Araiza J. Spatial modeling of the sanitary-ecological risk derived from the mismanagement of municipal solid waste, in the municipalities of the Cuenca del Ca˜n´on del Sumidero, Chiapas. (Thesis), Doctorate in geography - National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, 2019.
  73. Araiza J, Cram S, Ruiz N, et al. GIS-based approach to zoning the risk associated with municipal solid waste management: application to regional scale. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193: 1-20.