Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Application of probabilistic methods to turbine engine disk life prediction and risk assessment

Main Article Content

Paul Copp
Ashley Whitney-Rawls
Jace Carter
Tarun Goswami corresponding author

Abstract

Turbine engine disk life prediction and understanding the associated risk remains a significant challenge for today’s designer. Despite advances made in materials testing and characterization, as well as, the application of damage tolerance and linear elastic fracture mechanics modeling, there remains a void in properly assessing loading, geometry, and material design property variability. Add to this the application of advanced hybrid and composite material systems and the need to accurately deal with material variability is even greater. There still remain incidents of failure of critical components which were not properly accounted for by the existing analytical methods, testing, and inspections employed today. Application of probabilistic methods offers an effective and useful approach to modeling this variability while also providing a means by which to assess random variable sensitivity and risk assessment. Current research, as well as, applicable industry and government regulatory guidelines and publications were examined and will be presented. An assessment of the most effective tools, modeling methods, and predictive risk of failure assessments together with recommendations for future work will be discussed. The potential for probabilistic methods to provide a cost-effective way to manage fleet engine and component usage is presented, as well as, its ability to enhance the safe implementation of Retirement for Cause concepts to fleet management.

Keywords
damage tolerant life, life extension, disk components, probability of failure, non-destructive testing, risk assessment

Article Details

How to Cite
Copp, P., Whitney-Rawls, A., Carter, J., & Goswami, T. (2022). Application of probabilistic methods to turbine engine disk life prediction and risk assessment. Research on Intelligent Manufacturing and Assembly, 1(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.25082/RIMA.2022.01.002

References

  1. MIL-HDBK-1783B with Change 2. Engine Structural Integrity Program (ENSIP), September 22, 2004.
  2. MIL-STD-3024. Propulsion System Integrity Program (PSIP), 15 April 2008.
  3. Federal Aviation Regulation 33 Advisory Circular 33.14-1. Damage Tolerance for High Energy Turbine Engine Rotors, January 8, 2001.
  4. Advisory Circular 33.70. Engine Life-Limited Parts, November 5, 2007.
  5. Advisory Circular 33.70-1. Guidance Material for Aircraft Engine Life-Limited Parts Requirements, July 31, 2009.
  6. Advisory Circular 33.70-2. Damage Tolerance of Hole Features in High-Energy Turbine Engine Rotors, 28 August 2009.
  7. European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Certification Specification for Engines (CS-E), 24 October 2003.
  8. Ministry of Defence (MoD). Defence Standard (DEF STAN) 00-970 Part 11, Issue 1 Publication Date 27 January 2006. Design and Airworthiness Requirements for Service Aircraft, Part 11 - Engines.
  9. DOD Joint Service Specification Guide Engines, Aircraft, Turbine, JSS 2007A, 29 January 2004.
  10. Koul AK, Immarigeon JP, Beres W, et al. Life Cycle Management Strategies for Aging Engines 2000 RTO- MP-079(II)-(SM)-17, Presented at RTO AVT Symposium in Manchester, UK.
  11. Goswami T and Harrison GF. Role of Defects in Gas Turbine Disk Lifing Philosophies - a review, International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines, 1995, 12(1): 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1515/TJJ.1995.12.1.59
  12. Goswami T. Hot Section Turbine Disk Lifing Philosophies. ASME Gas Turbine World Congress, Cincinnati, Ohio, May 1993, paper no. 93-GT-363. https://doi.org/10.1115/93-GT-363
  13. Vukelich S. (SMII) 19, Engine Life Extension through the Use of Structural Assessment, Non- Destructive Inspection, and Material Characterization, RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on “Life Management Techniques for Ageing Vehicles” RTO-MP-079(II).
  14. Beres W and Koul AK. Damage Tolerance Assessment of Aging Nene X Turbine Discs, 2001, RTO-MP-079(I)-(SM)-14.
  15. Bagaviev A and Ulbrich A. Life Assessment of Turbine Components Based on Deterministic and Probabilistic Procedures. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2004, 81: 855-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.07.003
  16. Koul AK, Thamburaj R, Raizenne MD, et al. LTR-ST-1537, Practical Experience with Damage Tolerance Based Life Extension of Turbine Engine Components, National Research Council Canada Laboratory Technical Report, April 1985.
  17. Raizenne MD. Fatigue Crack Growth Results for Ti-6Al-4V, IMI 685 and Ti-17, Institute for Aerospace Research National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0R6.
  18. Lincoln JW. Aging Systems and Sustainment Technology. Structures Technology for Future Aerospace Systems, Ahmed K. Noor, Editor, Volume 188, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics 2000.
  19. Lincoln JW. Risk Assessments of Aging Aircraft. Proceedings of the First Joint DOD/FAA/NASA Conference on Aging Aircraft, 1997, Ogden, UT.
  20. Alford RE, Bell RP, Cochran JB, et al. C-141 WS 405 Risk Assessment, WL-TR-92-4045, Proceedings of the 1991 USAF Structural Integrity Program Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
  21. Berens AP, Hovey PW and Skinn DA. Risk Analysis for Aging Aircraft Fleets 1991 WL-TR-91-3066. Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433.
  22. Hovey PW, Berens AP and Loomis JS. Update of the Probability of Fracture (PROF) Computer Program for Aging Aircraft Risk Analysis, Volume 1 Modifications and User’s Guide. AFRL-VAWP- TR-1999-3030. Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 45469. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA363010
  23. Beres W and Koul AK. Damage Tolerance Assessment of Aging Nene X Turbine Disc, NATO-RTOAVT Symposium on Aging Mechanisms and Control (Part B - Monitoring and Management of Gas Turbine Fleets for Extended Life and Reduced Costs), AVT Meeting, Manchester, UK, 8-11 October 2001.
  24. Broede J. Re-Assessment (SM2) 16 Titanium Rotors in Military Aero Engines - Designed to Weight and Life RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on Cost Effective Application of Titanium Alloys in Military Platforms, RTO-MP-069(II).
  25. Annis C and Vukelich S. Statistical Characterization of Rare Events, 74th Meeting of the structures and Material Panel, AGARD-R-790.
  26. AGARD-R-766 (Addendum). Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, Engine Disk Cooperative Test Program, April 1993.
  27. Parker WH. Engine Life Assessment Test Case TF41 LP Compressor Shaft Torsional fatigue, AGARDAR- 308, Chapter 6.
  28. Petrovich A and Zeigler W. The Influence of Several Combined High/Low Cycle Loading Parameters on the Crack Growth of a Turbine Disk Alloy, Transacvtions of the ASME. Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress and reliability in Design, 1986, 108: 262-267. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3269337
  29. Wanhill RJH. Significance of Dwell Cracking for IN718 Turbine Disks, NLR-TP-99392.
  30. Connolley T, Reed PAS and Starink, M J. Short Crack Initiation and Growth at 600ºC in Notched Specimens of Inconel 718, Materials Research Group, School of Engineering Sciences University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
  31. Konig GW and Bergmann JW. Predicting Defect Behavior, 74th Meeting of the structures and Material Panel, held in Patras, Greece, 27-28 May 1992.
  32. Kappas J. Review of Risk and Reliability Methods for Aircraft Gas Turbine Engines, DSTO-TR-1306 Engines Division, Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory.
  33. McClung RC and Enright MP. The DARWIN®Computer Program for Probabilistic Damage Tolerance Analysis of Engine Rotors, Presented at ADF Aircraft Engine Symposium on 29-30 October 2003.
  34. Air Force Instruction 21-104, Selective Management of Selected Gas Turbine Engines.
  35. Cesare MA and Sues RH. PROFES Probabilistic Finite Element System– Bringing Probabilistic Mechanica to the Desktop. Applied Research Associates, Inc. Raleigh, N.C. (AIAA 99-1607, 1999). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-1607
  36. Jameel A. Honeywell, Surface Damage Tolerance Analysis of a Gas Turbine Engine Rotor, ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea and Air, GT2005-68760, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2005-68760
  37. Enright MP, Huyse L, McClung RC, et al. Probabilistic Methodology For Life Prediction of Aircraft Turbine Rotors, a Federal Aviation Administration report under Cooperative Agreement 95-G-041 and Grant 99-G-016, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/40722(153)63
  38. Millwater H, Larsen J and Reji J. Effects of residual stresses on probabilistic lifing of engine disk materials. Materials Science and Engineering, 2007, A: 468-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.169
  39. Enright MP, Leverant G, McClung RC, et al. A New Tool for Design and Certification of Aircraft Turbine Rotors, Proceedings of ASME TURBO EXPO 2002, June 3-6, 2002, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, GT-2002-30303. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2002-30303
  40. Millwater H and Osborn RW. Probabilistic Sensitivities for Fatigue Analysis of Turbine Engine Diskstitle, Hindawi Publishing Corporation. International Journal of Rotating Machinery,2006, 12: 12. https://doi.org/10.1155/IJRM/2006/28487
  41. Millwater H, Enright MP and Fitch SHK. Convergent Zone-Refinement Method for Risk Assessment of Gas Turbine Disks Subject to Low-Frequency Metallurgical Defects. ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2007, 129: 8272006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2431393
  42. Moody J, Millwater H and Enright MP. Adaptive Risk Refinement Methodology for Gas Turbine Engine Rotor Disks, 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials, 7-10 April 2008, Schaumburg, IL AIAA 2008-2224. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-2224
  43. Karamchandani AK. New approaches to structural system reliability, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, 1990.
  44. Wu YT, Enright MP and Millwater HR. Probabilistic methods for design assessment of reliability with inspection. AIAA Journal, 2012, 40(5): 937-946. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1730
  45. USAF Official Web Site AFGROW, Handbook for Damage Tolerance Design, January 2006.