Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

An Interpretable Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Framework Integrating Urban Economic Theory for Data-Driven Investment Prioritization in Regeneration

Main Article Content

Shohreh Ezzatian corresponding author
Crossmark logo

Abstract

This study designs and implements a novel data-driven framework for dynamically mapping investment alignment in urban regeneration, bridging the gap between urban economic theory and computational planning practice. The framework integrates parcel-level microdata on ownership, land use, building characteristics, and structural condition with contextual economic, social, and morphological data, modeling the city as a dynamic, multi-scale system. Methodologically, this research advances the state-of-the-art by combining Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks with Explainable AI to simultaneously capture spatial dependencies, temporal dynamics, and provide transparent decision pathways. The proposed approach reveals four distinct investment archetypes—Heritage-Led Development Cores, Strategic Redevelopment Corridors, Transition Zones, and Stable Residential Areas—through unsupervised learning applied to Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks embeddings. A key innovation lies in operationalizing theoretical concepts from Rent Gap theory and Institutional Economics into quantifiable machine learning features, enabling causal-like explanations via SHAP analysis. The framework outputs dynamic priority maps and an interactive geospatial dashboard that enables scenario testing and evidence-based resource allocation. Empirical validation demonstrates that model-generated investment archetypes showed 85% spatial concordance with areas independently identified as high-priority by a panel of senior urban planners. Additionally, the model achieved a Silhouette Score of 0.62 in cluster validation and R² of 0.92 in surrogate model performance, indicating strong analytical robustness. This research contributes to both urban science and planning practice by providing a scalable, interpretable approach for investment prioritization in complex urban environments.

Keywords
urban regeneration, spatio-temporal graph neural networks, explainable AI, investment prioritization, data-driven governance

Article Details

How to Cite
Ezzatian, S. (2026). An Interpretable Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Framework Integrating Urban Economic Theory for Data-Driven Investment Prioritization in Regeneration. Sustainable Construction and Risks, 1(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.25082/SCR.2025.01.004

References

  1. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models (Vol. 4). Springer Science & Business Media.
  2. Batty, M. (2018). Inventing Future Cities. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11923.001.0001
  3. Bettencourt, L. M. A. (2021). Introduction to Urban Science. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13909.001.0001
  4. Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., & Vandergheynst, P. (2017). Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(4), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2017.2693418
  5. Glaeser, E. (2020). Urbanization and its Discontents. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26839
  6. Glaeser, E. L., Gorback, C., & Redding, S. J. (2022). JUE Insight: How much does COVID-19 increase with mobility? Evidence from New York and four other U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 127, 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2020.103292
  7. Green, B. (2019). The Smart Enough City. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11555.001.0001
  8. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
  9. Hui, E. C. M., Li, X., & Chen, T. (2020). From housing inequality to neighborhood displacement: The role of urban redevelopment in Shanghai. Urban Studies, 57(16), 3328-3345.
  10. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. Routledge.
  11. Kitchin, R. (2021). The Data Revolution: A Critical Analysis of Big Data, Open Data and Data Infrastructures. Sage.
  12. Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G. (2015). Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.983149
  13. Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. Routledge.
  14. Liang, X., Liu, Y., & Qiu, T. (2022). Data-driven urban regeneration: A systematic literature review. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(3), 1009-1027.
  15. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
  16. Madanipour, A. (2017). Cities in Time (, Ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350014275
  17. Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book
  18. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
  19. Pearl, J. (2019). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.
  20. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
  21. Smith, N. (1979). Toward a Theory of Gentrification A Back to the City Movement by Capital, not People. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367908977002
  22. Webster, C., & Lai, L. W. C. (2003). Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Edward Elgar.
  23. Wyly, E. K., & Hammel, D. J. (1999). Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Housing Policy Debate, 10(4), 711–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1999.9521348
  24. Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Spatio-Temporal Data Mining: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.