Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Gender-specific anterior cruciate ligament – gait forces

Main Article Content

Bharadwaj Cheruvu
Amy Neidhard-Doll
Tarun Goswami corresponding author


The purpose of this study was to investigate gender-based differences in gait biomechanics and to evaluate those effects on forces generated on the ACL during walking. Estimation of gender-specific ACL forces in the frontal plane can provide a better understanding of the biomechanical patterns underlying higher female injury risk. The present study used a sample from the Fels Longitudinal Study to test the hypothesis that there are significant gender-differences in frontal plane ACL loading during walking. A cross-sectional sample of 178 participants, including 79 males and 99 females was used to evaluate differences in gait kinetics. Females walked at higher cadence with narrower steps (P < 0.05). No difference was observed in the peak flexion force and knee rotation moment between males and females (P = 0.51 and 0.07), respectively. Peak abduction moment was significantly lower among females than in males (P = 0.05). A regression equation was developed which considers a person’s weight and height in addition to forces which could give better estimate of the forces acting on the ligament. The peak force acting on the ACL during walking reaches as high as 0.44 of BW, regardless of gender.

gait, anterior cruciate ligament, kinetics, gender differences

Article Details

Supporting Agencies
Authors are grateful to Division of Morphological Sciences and Biostatistics, Lifespan Health Research Center, Department of Community Health, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, 3171 Research Blvd., Dayton, OH 45420-4014, USA for providing the gait data.
How to Cite
Cheruvu, B., Neidhard-Doll, A., & Goswami, T. (2022). Gender-specific anterior cruciate ligament – gait forces. Advances in General Practice of Medicine, 4(1), 42-47.


  1. Alentorn-Geli E, Myer GD, Silvers HJ, et al. Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: Mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 2009, 17(7): 705-729.
  2. Agel J, Arendt EA and Bershadsky B. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association basketball and soccer a 13-year review. The American journal of sports medicine, 2005, 33(4): 524-531.
  3. Knowles SB. Is there an injury epidemic in girls’ sports?. British journal of sports medicine, 2010, 44(1): 38-44.
  4. Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin Jr JA, et al. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics, 2000, 23(6): 573-578.
  5. Cho SH, Park JM and Kwon OY. Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Clinical biomechanics, 2004, 19(2): 145-152.
  6. Kerrigan DC, Todd MK, Della Croce U, et al. Biomechanical gait alterations independent of speed in the healthy elderly: evidence for specific limiting impairments. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1998, 79(3): 317-322.
  7. Zhang K, Werner P, Sun M, et al. Measurement of human daily physical activity. Obesity research, 2003, 11(1): 33-40.
  8. Morrison JB. The Mechanics of the Knee Joint in Relation to Normal Walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 1970, 3(1): 51-61.
  9. Shelburne KB, Pandy MG, Anderson FC, et al. Pattern of anterior cruciate ligament force in normal walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 2004, 37(6): 797-805.
  10. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes a prospective study. The American journal of sports medicine, 2005, 33(4): 492-501.
  11. Kanamori A, Woo SL, Ma CB, et al. The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: a human cadaveric study using robotic technology. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2000, 16(6): 633-639.
  12. Sherwood RJ and Duren DL. Growth of a species, an association, a science: 80 years of growth and development research. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2013, 150: 1-4.
  13. Lohman TG, Roche AF and Martorell R, Eds. (1988). Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics Publishers.
  14. Hof AL. Letter to the editor: Scaling gait data to body size. Gait Posture, 1996, 4: 222-223.
  15. Winkelstein BA. (Ed.). (2012). Orthopaedic biomechanics. CRC Press.
  16. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK and Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1990, 8: 383-92.
  17. Anderson FC and Pandy MG. Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking. Gait & posture, 2003, 17(2): 159-169.
  18. McKean KA, Landry SC, Hubley-Kozey CL, et al. Gender differences exist in osteoarthritic gait. Clinical Biomechanics, 2007, 22(4): 400-409.
  19. Collins JJ. The redundant nature of locomotor optimization laws. Journal of Biomechanics, 1995, 28: 251-267.