Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Social prescribing as an intervention for people with work-related injuries and psychosocial difficulties in Australia

Main Article Content

Christina Aggar corresponding author
Theresa Caruana
Tamsin Thomas
J. R. Baker


Psychosocial interventions that encourage optimism and connectedness can promote workplace injury recovery and improve wellbeing. A mixed-methods evaluation of a twelve-week program for injured workers in Sydney, Australia, explored three research questions: if a social prescribing approach contributed to (1) increased social and economic participation, (2) improved psychological functioning and quality of life, and (3) decreased health service utilisation. Retrospective analysis of pre- and post-intervention data was undertaken, involving quantitative indicators of social, economic, and health status using validated psychosocial assessment tools (n = 175). These findings were augmented with data from the insurance regulator (n = 177) and insights from link worker documentation of participant activity (n = 178), a program satisfaction survey (n = 167), and participant interviews (n = 44). The social prescribing program was associated with significant improvements in frequency and confidence in participating in social activities and returning to work, in all measures of biopsychosocial wellbeing, and in reducing health service use. Qualitative information identified a range of personal improvements, including greater self-awareness, social connections, and ability to cope with the effects of injury and employment loss. This is the first known Australian study to evaluate a social prescribing intervention for psychosocial rehabilitation for injured workers in Australia. These findings suggest that a social prescribing approach is effective, but further consideration of barriers, including workplace characteristics and procedural difficulties in accessing occupational rehabilitation services, is needed.

psychosocial support systems, occupational injuries, return to work, social participation, self-management

Article Details

How to Cite
Aggar, C., Caruana, T., Thomas, T., & Baker, J. R. (2020). Social prescribing as an intervention for people with work-related injuries and psychosocial difficulties in Australia. Advances in Health and Behavior, 3(1), 101-111.


  1. Bickerdike L, Booth A,Wilson PM, et al. Social prescribing: Less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. British Medical Journal Open, 2017, 7: e013384.
  2. Chatterjee HJ, Camic PM, Lockyer B, et al. Non-clinical community interventions: A systematised review of social prescribing schemes. Arts & Health, 2018, 10(2): 97-123.
  3. Kilgarriff-Foster A and O’Cathain A. Exploring the components and impact of social prescribing. Journal of Public Mental Health, 2015, 14(3): 127-134.
  4. Mossabir R, Morris R, Kennedy A, et al. A scoping review to understand the effectiveness of linking schemes from healthcare providers to community resources to improve the health and well-being of people with long-term conditions. Health & Social Care in the Community, 2015, 23(5): 467- 484.
  5. Safe Work Australia. Australian Workers’ Compensation Statistics 2016-17, 2018.
  6. Collie A, Di Donato M and Iles R. Work disability in Australia: An overview of prevalence, expenditure, support systems and services. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2019, 29(3): 526-539.
  7. Grant GM, O’Donnell ML, Spittal MJ, et al. Relationship between stressfulness of claiming for injury compensation and long-term recovery: A prospective cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry, 2014, 71(4): 446-453.
  8. Kilgour E, Kosny A, McKenzie D, et al. Interactions between injured workers and insurers in workers compensation systems: A systematic review of qualitative research literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2015, 25(1): 160-181.
  9. Dean AM, Matthewson M, Buultjens M, et al. Scoping review of claimants experiences within Australian workers compensation systems. Australian Health Review, 2019, 43(4): 457-465.
  10. White C, Green RA, Ferguson S, et al. The influence of social support and social integration factors on return to work outcomes for individuals with work-related injuries: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2019, 29: 636-659.
  11. McLinton S, McLinton SS and Van der Linden M. Psychosocial factors impacting workplace injury rehabilitation: Evaluation of a concise screening tool. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2018, 28(1): 121-129.
  12. Bailey TS, Dollard MF, McLinton SS, et al. Psychosocial safety climate, psychosocial and physical factors in the aetiology of musculoskeletal disorder symptoms and workplace injury compensation claims. Work Stress, 2015, 29(2): 190- 211.
  13. Bunzli S, Singh N, Mazza D, et al. Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: Qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia. BMC Public Health, 2017, 17(1): 313.
  14. Khorshidi HA, Marembo M and Aickelin U. Predictors of return to work for occupational rehabilitation users in work-related injury insurance claims: Insights from mental health. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. Advance online publication, 2019, 29(4): 740-753.
  15. Fenner P. Returning to work after an injury. Australian Family Physician, 2013, 42(4): 182-185.;dn=253224635413814;res=IELHEA
  16. Heymans MW, De Vet HCW, Knol DL, et al. Workers’ beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2006, 16(4): 685- 695.
  17. Cole DC, Mondloch MV and Hogg-Johnson S. Listening to injured workers: How recovery expectations predict outcomes - a prospective study. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2002, 166(6): 749-754.
  18. Dunstan DA, Covic T and Tyson GA. What leads to the expectation to return to work? Insights from a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) model of future work outcomes. Work, 2013, 46(1): 25-37.
  19. Godges JJ, Anger MA, Zimmerman G, et al. Effects of education on return-to-work status for people with fear-avoidance beliefs and acute low back pain. Physical Therapy, 2008, 88(2): 231-239.
  20. Sullivan M, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, et al. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2005, 15(4): 475-489.
  21. Legg MJ. What is psychosocial care and how can nurses better provide it to adult oncology patients. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2011, 28(3): 61-67.
  22. Langford K, Baeck P and Hampson M. More than medicine: New services for people powered health. London: Nesta Innovation Unit, 2013.
  23. Thomson LJ, Camic PM and Chatterjee HJ. Social prescribing: A review of community referral schemes. London: University College London, 2015.
  24. Duggan M, Chislett WK and Calder R. The state of selfcare in Australia. Australian Health Policy Collaboration Commissioned Paper no. 02/2017. Melbourne: AHPC, 2017.
  25. Bragg R,Wood C and Barton J. Ecominds effects on mental wellbeing: An evaluation for Mind. Stratford/London: Mind, 2013.
  26. Bretherton J and Pleace N. An evaluation of the Broadway Skills Exchange Time Bank. York, UK: Centre for Housing Policy, University of York, 2014.
  27. Crone DM, Sumner RC, Baker CM, et al. ‘Artlift’ arts-onreferral intervention in UK primary care: Updated findings from an ongoing observational study. European Journal of Public Health, 2018, 28(3): 404-409.
  28. Dayson C and Bashir N. The social and economic impact of the Rotherham Social Prescribing Pilot: Main evaluation report. Rotherham/Sheffield: Voluntary Action Rotherham and Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, 2014.
  29. Dayson C, Bashir N, Bennet E and Sanderson E. The Rotherham social prescribing service for people with long-term health conditions: Summary report. Rotherham/ Sheffield: Voluntary Action Rotherham and Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, 2016.
  30. Innovation Unit. Wigan Community Link Worker service evaluation, 2016.
  31. Kimberlee R, Ward R, Jones M and Powell J. Measuring the economic impact of Wellspring Health Living Centres Social Prescribing Wellbeing Programme for low level mental health issues encountered by GP services. Bristol: Wellspring, 2014.
  32. Laing K, Steer M, Lawson S, et al. How Ways to Wellness social prescribing is improving the health and wellbeing of people with long term conditions: Evaluation report to the Cabinet Office. University of Newcastle, UK: Institute of Health & Society, 2017.
  33. Margrove KL, Heydinrych K and Secker J. Waiting listcontrolled evaluation of a participatory arts course for people experiencing mental health problems. Perspectives in Public Health, 2013, 133(1): 28-35.
  34. Moffatt S, Steer M, Lawson S, et al. Link worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: Qualitative study of service user perceptions. British Medical Journal Open, 2017, 7: e015203.
  35. Slade M, Thornicroft G, Loftus S, et al. CAN: Camberwell Assessment of Need. London: Gaskell, 1999.
  36. Van Reenen M and Janssen B. EQ-5D-5L User Guide, 2015.
  37. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in nonspecific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 2002, 32(6): 959-976.
  38. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, et al. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 2004, 26(6): 655-672.
  39. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, et al. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 2004, 26(6): 655-672.
  40. Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3(2): 77- 101.
  41. World Health Organisation. WHOQOL-BREF: Introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the Assessment, 1996.