Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Do doctors work for patients in today's business-mentality world: Looking through consumer choice theory lens?

Main Article Content

Akim M. Rahman corresponding author

Abstract

In the 21st century world, people mostly behave with business-mentality without considering moral obligations in society. In this behavioral change, service-market, particularly Medical-care service-market is appeared to be vulnerable. Because of supplying medical-care services, the doctor or hospital receives capitation payments, fees-for-services, risk pool settlements, incentive payments or other fees. However, today it is probably the most criticized profession in world-economy country-wise such as Bangladesh. Sometimes doctors here are blamed for requiring unnecessary tests of patients for doctor’s own monetary gains. In some cases, doctors’ efforts are assumed to be connecting with pharmaceutical-products promotion by writing lengthy prescriptions. Some group claims that today doctors spend less time for each patient. All these interactions justify claiming that a patient works for a doctor when the patient visits a doctor for medical-care services. Here the existence of “asymmetric information” dominates the medical-care market where doctor takes advantages in multi-faucets. It causes market inefficiency that creates negative economic externalities – deadweight loss. Improving medical education with special emphasis on ethical aspects and soft skills in communication are considered important in aim to reduce the magnitudes of today’s dilemma of medical-care service-market. Also, strict enforcements of medical-care provisions and ethical code of conduct among all health works can be instrumental. Finally, the answer to the question “Do doctors work for patients or something else, depends on who are asked. But the reflections of today’s medical-care-market in economy of Bangladesh are no deniable, which deserves to be studied further curtailing the magnitudes of the problem.

Keywords
medical-care service-market, Hippocratic oath, misuse of services, economic externalities, deadweight loss

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, A. M. (2022). Do doctors work for patients in today’s business-mentality world: Looking through consumer choice theory lens?. Frontiers in Management and Business, 4(1), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.25082/FMB.2023.01.002

References

  1. Rahman A. Mathematics for Business and Economics, ISBN: 978-0-9557163-0-0, Academic Textbook, Print Your Books Academic Publishing, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh, 2020 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3621752
  2. Rahman A. Do Patients Work for Doctors in Today’s Healthcare Services of Bangladesh. Biomedical Journal of Sciences & Technical Research, 2022, 45(3): 36474-36482. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2022.45.007204
  3. The Financial Express. Doctors in Bangladesh see patients for merely 48 seconds on average, reveals study FE Online Desk, Friday, 10 November 2017.
  4. Tribune D. Survey: New poor in Bangladesh stands at 24.5 million. 2021.
  5. Oyedokun A, Adeloye D and Balogun O. Clinical history-taking and physical examination in medical practice in Africa: still relevant? Croatian Medical Journal, 2016, 57(6): 605. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2016.57.605
  6. Goold S D and Lipkin Jr M. The doctor–patient relationship: challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Journal of general internal medicine, 1999, 14(S1): S26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00267.x
  7. Lefever RA, West T and Trevelyan T. Doctor-patient relationships. British Medical Journal, 1972, 2: 230-231. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5807.230-b
  8. Aloba O, Esan O and Alimi T. Psychometric qualities of the 9-item patient doctor relationship questionnaire in stable Nigerian patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Behavior Health, 2015, 4(4): 112. https://doi.org/10.5455/jbh.188856
  9. Benbassat J, Pilpel D and Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Behavioral Medicine, 1998, 24(2): 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289809596384
  10. Zhang B, Nilsson ME and Prigerson HG. Factors important to patients’ quality of life at the end of life. Archives of internal medicine, 2012, 172(15): 1133-1142. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2364
  11. The Daily Star. Bangladesh should listen to its health workers, Newspaper. The Daily Star, 20020.
  12. The Business Standard. No middleman, no patients: Brokers rule Savar private hospitals, Business Standard, April 16, 2022, Reported by Noman Mahmud.
  13. Bangladesh Health Watch. Health workforce in Bangladesh: Who constitutes the health care system? The state of health in Bangladesh 2007. Dhaka: BRAC University, 2008. https://sph.bracu.ac.bd
  14. Ahmed SM, Evans TG, Standing H, et al. Harnessing pluralism for better health in Bangladesh. The Lancet, 2013, 382(9906): 1746-1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62147-9
  15. Khan MM and Horchkiss D. Bangladesh health facility survey 2009. Dhaka: World Bank, 2010.
  16. Kruger B. Untitled (your body is a battleground). Yale Univ. Press, 2020.
  17. Rahman A. COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis Country-wise: Looking Thru Consumer Choice Theory Lens, 20021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3946800
  18. Rahman A. Way to demolish Sabrina-ism in public Sector. The Daily Observer, 2021.
  19. Rahman A. COVID-19 Brings Blessing for Digital-Banking in World-Economy Country-Wise: An Analysis Under Demand-Supply Model of Market Economics. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 2021, 6(2): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210602.12
  20. Rahman A. COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis Country-wise: Looking Thru Consumer Choice Theory Lens, ISBN: 978-620-4-20811-4, Lambert Academic Publishing, Greece, 2021. https://www.lap-publishing.com
  21. Rahman A. Microeconomics Basic New Way Learning Microeconomics in the 21st Century Era, ISBN: 978-0-9557163-0-0. Academic Textbook, 2019.
  22. Samuelson P and Wheatland T. Statutory damages in copyright law: A remedy in need of reform. Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 2009, 51: 439.
  23. Rahman A. Free-Of-Charge VI Product Can Ensure Attachment to Loyalty in E-Banking Services: Seeking Bank-Management’s Attention for Boosting Customers’ Psychological Engagements. Psychology and Behavioral Science International Journal, 2022, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.19080/PBSIJ.2022.20.556026
  24. TheWorld Health Organization (WHO). The world health report-health system: improving performance. Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.