Open Access


Research Article

Main Article Content

Julie Hotcorresponding author
Paul Bradley
Jayson Cooper
Barnabé Wayser
Erick Ringot


Indoor air is contaminated by numerous pollutants, which impact human health, comfort and productivity. These pollutants have various indoor sources such as building materials, furniture, combustion appliances or tobacco smoke. However, the pollution also comes from outside. In urban area, nitrogen oxides (NOx) emitted into the atmosphere can reach alarming levels. These traffic-related pollutants, which seriously impact the global environment and human health, can infiltrate inside buildings. Therefore, limiting the amount of breathable NOx in outdoor and indoor environments is an important priority for the modern society. The photocatalytic process has attracted particular attention in the last two decades and has proved to be efficient to reduce the concentration of NOx. However, further work has to be conducted to assess its efficiency in real indoor environments. The purpose of this paper was to report on the indoor air quality in an open space office in Manchester, UK. Focus was made on nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The indoor concentrations of both gases were monitored from 14 January 2019 to 7 April 2019. During this period, a photocatalytic coating was applied to a part of the indoor wall. The influence of this coating on the level of NOx was assessed by comparing the indoor concentrations before and after the application. An attention was paid to the correlation between outdoor and indoor pollution and to the effect of other parameters such as temperature, humidity, pressure and O3 concentration. The results showed that the photocatalytic process led to a decrease in the NOx concentration. The likelihood to find concentrations above 35 ppb for NO and 7.5 ppb for NO2 was clearly reduced after the coating application.

nitrogen oxides, in situ, office, photocatalysis, titanium dioxide, indoor air quality

Article Details

How to Cite
Hot, J., Bradley, P., Cooper, J., Wayser, B., & Ringot, E. (2019). In situ investigation of NOᵪ photocatalytic degradation: Case study in an open space office in Manchester, UK. Health and Environment, 1(1), 28-37.


  1. Development of WHO guidelines for indoor air quality, Report on a Working Group Meeting, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Bonn, Germany, 23-24 October 2006.
  2. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould, World Health Organization, 2009.
  3. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants, World Health Organization, 2010.
  4. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: household fuel combustion, World Health Organization, 2014.
  5. Shin SH and Jo WK. Volatile organic compound concentrations, emission rates, and source apportionment in newly-built apartments at pre-occupancy stage. Chemosphere, 2012, 89(5): 569-578.
  6. Gunschera J, Mentese S, Salthammer T, et al. Impact of building materials on indoor formaldehyde levels: Effect of ceiling tiles, mineral fiber insulation and gypsum board. Building and Environment, 2013, 64: 138-145.
  7. Harb P, Locoge N and Thevenet F. Emissions and treatment of VOCs emitted from wood-based construction materials: Impact on indoor air quality. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 354: 641-652.
  8. Singh J, 2006, Building Mycology: Management of decay and health in buildings, Taylor & Francis.
  9. Sahlberg B, Gunnbj¨ornsdottir M, Soon A, et al. Airborne molds and bacteria, microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC), plasticizers and formaldehyde in dwellings in three North European cities in relation cities in relation to sick building syndrome (SBS). Science of The Total Environment, 2013, 444: 433-440.
  10. Ekberg LE. Concentrations of NO2 and other traffic related contaminants in office buildings located in urban environments. Building and Environment, 1995, 30(2): 293-298.
  11. Crump DR, Squire RW and Yu CWF. Sources and concentrations of formaldehyde and other volatile organic compounds in the indoor air of four newly built unoccupied test houses. Indoor and Built Environment, 1997, 6(1): 45-55.
  12. Challoner A and Gill L. Indoor/outdoor air pollution relationships in ten commercial buildings: PM2:5 and NO2. Building and Environment, 2014, 80: 159-173.
  13. European Union emission inventory report 1990-2017, EEA Report No 08/2019, viewed September 5, 2019. european-union-emissions-inventory-report-2017
  14. Wade III WA, Cote WA and Yocom JE. A study of indoor air quality. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1975, 25(9): 933-939.
  15. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, viewed September 5, 2019.
  16. Degraeuwe B, Thunis P, Clappier A, et al. Impact of passenger car NOx emissions on urban NO2 pollutionScenario analysis for 8 European cities. Atmospheric Environment, 2017, 171: 330-337.
  17. Font A and Fuller GW. Did policies to abate atmospheric emissions from traffic have a positive effect in London? Environmental Pollution, 2016, 218: 463-474.
  18. Carslaw DC, Farren NJ, Vaughan AR, et al. The diminishing importance of nitrogen dioxide emissions from road vehicle exhaust. Atmospheric Environment: X, 2019, 1: 100002.
  19. City of London, Air Quality Strategy 2015-2020, June 2015, viewed September 9, 2019. environmental-health/environmental-protection/air-quality/ Documents/city-of-london-air-quality-strategy-2015.pdf
  20. City of London Draft Transport Strategy, Draft for consultation, November 2018, viewed September 9, 2019. transport-and-streets/Documents/ city-of-london-transport-strategy-draft-vision.pdf
  21. D´ecret no 2018-487 du 15 juin 2018 relatif aux vitesses maximales autoris´ees des v´ehicules, France.
  22. ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, ANSES’s List of Indoor Air Quality Guideline Values, viewed September 9, 2019. VGAI Juillet2018EN.pdf
  23. Ameta R, Solanki MS, Benjamin S, et al. 2018, Photocatalysis, in Advanced Oxidation Processes forWasteWater Treatment, Academic Press, 135-175.
  24. ngelo J, Andrade L and Mendes A. Highly active photocatalytic paint for NOx abatement under real-outdoor condition. Applied Catalysis A: Generals, 2014, 484: 17-25.
  25. Tobaldi DM, Graziani L, Seabra MP, et al. Functionalised exposed building materials: Self-cleaning, photocatalytic and biofouling abilities. Ceramics International, 2017, 43(13): 10316-10325.
  26. Kaja AM, Brouwers HJH and Yu QL. NOx degradation by photocatalytic mortars: the underlying role of the CH and CSH carbonation. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 125: 105805.
  27. Nath RK, Zain MFM and Jamil M. An environment-friendly solution for indoor air purification by using renewable photocatalysts in concrete: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 62: 1184-1194.
  28. Mandin C, Trantallidi M, Cattaneo A, et al. Assessment of indoor air quality in office buildings across Europe-The OFFICAIR study. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 579: 169-178.
  29. AQE, Air Quality England.
  30. Rijnders E, Janssen NA, Van Vliet PH, et al. Personal and outdoor nitrogen dioxide concentrations in relation to degree of urbanization and traffic density. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001, 109(suppl 3): 411-417.
  31. Colbeck I. Nitrogen dioxide in the workplace environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1998, 52(1-2): 123-130.
  32. Kukadia V and Palmer J. The effect of external atmospheric pollution on indoor air quality: a pilot study. Energy and Buildings, 1998, 27(3): 223-230.
  33. Phillips JL, Field R, Goldstone M, et al. Relationships between indoor and outdoor air quality in four naturally ventilated offices in the United Kingdom. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, 1993, 27(11): 1743-1753.
  34. Hot J, Topalov J, Ringot E, et al. Investigation on parameters affecting the effectiveness of photocatalytic functional coatings to degrade NO: TiO2 amount on surface, illumination, and substrate roughness. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2017, 2017: ID6241615.
  35. Zouzelka R and Rathousky J. Photocatalytic abatement of NOx pollutants in the air using commercial functional coating with porous morphology. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 217: 466-476.
  36. Martinez T, Bertron A, Ringot E, et al. Degradation of NO using photocatalytic coatings applied to different substrates. Building and Environment, 2011, 46(9): 1808-1816.
  37. Hot J, Martinez T, Wayser B, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of NO/NO2 gas injected into a 10-m3 experimental chamber. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(14): 12562-12570.
  38. Topalov J, Hot J, Ringot E, et al. In situ NO abatement by photocatalysisstudy under continuous NO injection in a 10 m3 experimental chamber. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2019, 12(2): 229-240.
  39. De Souza A, Aristone F, Kumar U, et al. Analysis of the correlations between NO, NO2 and O3 concentrations in Campo Grande-MS, Brazil. European Chemical Bulletin, 2017, 6(7): 284-291.
  40. Han S, Bian H, Feng Y, et al. Analysis of the relationship between O3, NO and NO2 in Tianjin, China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2011, 11(2): 128-139.
  41. Ghazali NA, Ramli NA, Yahaya AS, et al. Transformation of nitrogen dioxide into ozone and prediction of ozone concentrations using multiple linear regression techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 165(1-4): 475-489.
  42. Chan AT. Indooroutdoor relationships of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides under different outdoor meteorological conditions. Atmospheric Environment, 2002, 36(9): 1543- 1551.