Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Main Article Content

Xiaoping He corresponding author

Abstract

This paper explored the role of social trust in public participating in environmental governance, by examining household decisions making on paying for the environment. The data was collected from World Values Survey which was conducted on over 1,900 residents in China. Individual’s trust profile was identified by applying the Latent Class Analysis (LCA) approach, respectively in interpersonal trust and institutional trust dimensions. The resulted posterior probabilities of trust classes obtained from LCA were used as predictors for household's payment decisions. The results show that in contemporary Chinese societies, "extended family trust” dominates in the interpersonal dimension, while "political trust" prevails in the institutional dimension. Social trust exerts positive impacts household’s willingness to pay for the environments, while the positive effects vary with trust patterns and payment patterns (donation pattern and tax pattern). Overall, interpersonal trust exerts weaker effect than institutional trust; the positive effect of trust is weaker in the tax pattern of paying than in the donation pattern of paying. The article concluded that generalized trust in institution is critical for improving civic participation in environmental governance.

Keywords
household decision, environmental governance, social capital, willingness to pay

Article Details

How to Cite
He, X. (2020). The role of social trust in public participation in environmental governance: Empirical evidence from households in China. Resources and Environmental Economics, 2(2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.25082/REE.2020.02.005

References

  1. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162(3859): 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  2. Gifford R and Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence proenvironmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 2014, 49(3): 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
  3. Rudd MA. Live long and prosper: collective action, social capital and social vision. Ecological Economics, 2000, 34(1): 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00152-X
  4. Putnam R. The prosperous community: social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 1993, 4(13): 35-42.
  5. Pretty J and Ward H. Social capital and the environment. World Development, 2001, 29(2): 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X
  6. Weber M and Gerth HH. The religion of China, Confucianism and Taoism. Philosophy, 1953, 105(28): 187-189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100059441
  7. Simmel G. The sociology of sociability. American Journal of Sociology, 1949, 55(3): 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1086/220534
  8. Kaase M. Interpersonal trust, political trust and noninstitutionalized political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics, 1999, 22(3): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389908425313
  9. Delhey J and Newton K. Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European societies, 2003, 5(2): 93- 137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000072256
  10. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G and Roth C. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 2000, 20(3): 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034
  11. Almond GA and Verba S. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University. 1963. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400874569
  12. Putnam RD. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
  13. Uslaner EM. The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.824504
  14. Holm HJ and Danielson A. Tropic trust versus Nordic trust: experimental evidence from Tanzania and Sweden. The Economic Journal, 2005, 115(503): 505-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.00998.x
  15. Gchter S, Herrmann B and Thni C. Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2004, 55(4): 505-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.006
  16. Snderskov KM. Different goods, different effects: Exploring the effects of generalized social trust in large-N collective action. Public Choice, 2009, 140(1-2): 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9416-0
  17. Ostrom E and Walker J. (Eds.) Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons for experimental research. Russell Sage Foundation, 2003.
  18. Kahneman D and Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrita, 1979, 47(2): 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  19. Weber EU and Johnson EJ. Psychology and behavioral economics lessons for the design of a green growth strategy, Policy Research Working Paper Series 6240, The World Bank, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6240
  20. Fay M. Inclusive green growth: the pathway to sustainable development. Washington DC: World Bank Publications, 2012.
  21. Liu Y, Hong Z, Zhu J, et al. Promoting green residential buildings: Residents’ environmental attitude, subjective knowledge, and social trust matter. Energy Policy, 2018, 112: 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.020
  22. Earle TC and Cvetkovich G. Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Greenwood Publishing Group. 1995.
  23. Huijts NN, Molin EE and Van Wee B. Hydrogen fuel station acceptance: A structural equation model based on the technology acceptance framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, 38: 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.008
  24. Siegrist M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 2000, 20(2): 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020
  25. Stenner K, Frederiks ER, Hobman EV, et al. Willingness to participate in direct load control: The role of consumer distrust. Applied energy, 2017, 189: 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.099
  26. Liu P, Yang R and Xu Z. Public acceptance of fully automated driving: Effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions. Risk Analysis, 2019, 39(2): 326-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13143
  27. Videras J, Owen AL, Conover E and Wu S. The influence of social relationships on pro-environment behaviors. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2012, 63(1): 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.07.006
  28. Jessoe K and Rapson D. Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(4): 1417-1438.
  29. Suh B and Han I. Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electronic Commerce research and applications, 2002, 1(3-4): 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(02)00017-0
  30. Urena R, Kou G, Dong Y, et al. A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks. Information Sciences, 2019, 478: 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.11.037
  31. Ostrom E. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 1998, 92(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925
  32. Baldassare M and Katz C. The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environment and Behavior, 1992, 24(5): 602-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916592245002
  33. Kotchen MJ and Michael MR. Private provision of environmental public goods: Household participation in greenelectricity programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2007, 53(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.06.003
  34. Knack S and Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(4): 1251-1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475
  35. Fei HT, Fei X, Hamilton GG, et al. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. University of California Press, 1992.
  36. Fukuyama F. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press, 1995.
  37. Chen G and Chung J. The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 1994, 42(2): 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369919
  38. Tan SJ and Tambyah SK. Generalized trust and trust in institutions in Confucian Asia. Social Indicators Research, 2011, 103(3): 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9703-7
  39. Xin Z and Xin S. Marketization process predicts trust decline in China. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2017, 62: 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.07.001
  40. Tao R, Yang DL, Li M, et al. How does political trust affect social trust? An analysis of survey data from rural China using an instrumental variables approach. International Political Science Review, 2014, 35(2): 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512113492599
  41. Rothstein B and Stolle D. Social capital and street-level bureaucracy: An institutional theory of generalized trust. ESF Conference Social Capital: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Exeter, UK. 2001, September 15-20.
  42. Mayer RC, Davis JH and Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
  43. Mishler W and Rose R. What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in postcommunist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 2001, 34(1): 30-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002
  44. Torpe L and Lolle H. Identifying social trust in crosscountry analysis: do we really measure the same? Social Indicators Research, 2011, 103(3): 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9713-5
  45. Hagenaars JA and McCutcheon AL. (Eds). Applied Latent Class Analysis. Cambridge University Press. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499531
  46. Lin TH and Dayton CM. Model selection information criteria for non-nested latent class models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1997, 22(3): 249-264. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986022003249
  47. Owen AL and Videras J. Culture and public goods: The case of religion and the voluntary provision of environmental quality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2007, 54(2): 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.04.001
  48. Michler W and Rose R. What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Postcommunist Societies. Comparative Political Studies. 2001, 34(1): 30-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002
  49. MacFarquhar R. The post-Confucian challenge. The Economist, 1980, 9: 67-72.
  50. Wang Z. Before the emergence of critical citizens: Economic development and political trust in China. International Review of Sociology, 2005, 15(1): 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700500038876
  51. Roodman D. Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. The Stata Journal, 2011, 11(2): 159-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1101100202
  52. Greene WH. Econometric Analysis. Pearson Education India, 2003.
  53. House JS and Wolf S. Effects of urban residence on interpersonal trust and helping behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36: 1029-1043. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.9.1029
  54. Murphy K. Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and tax noncompliance. Journal of Law and Society, 2005, 32(4): 562-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00338.x
  55. Baland J and Platteau J. Division of the commons: a partial assessment of the new institutional economics of land rights. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998, 80(3): 644-650. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244574
  56. Bjrnskov C. How does social trust affect economic growth? Southern Economic Journal, 2012, 78(4): 1346-1368. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-78.4.1346