Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Computational and Experimental Investigation of Peel and Shear Stress Distribution in Adhesive bonded Hybrid Sisal-Glass Reinforced HDPE Composite for Automobile Side Body Panel

Main Article Content

Samuel Tesfaye Molla corresponding author
Assefa Asmare Tsegaw
Teshome Mulatie Bogale
Addisu Negash Ali
Asmamaw Tegegne Abebe

Abstract

This study presents an integrated computational and experimental study of peel and shear stress distributions in adhesively bonded single-side strap joints (ABSSSJ). These joints comprise a hybrid sisal-glass reinforced HDPE lower adherend and a steel upper adherend for au- tomobile side body panel applications. The study combined fabrication and mechanical (tensile and lap-shear) testing of hybrid composites with different fiber ratios and stacking sequences; parametric Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) based finite-element simulations in ANSYS; and an analytical variational-method (VM) solution for interfacial stress functions to cross-validate nu- merical predictions. Adhesive properties (modulus 1.85–6.0 GPa), adhesive thickness (0.2–1.0 mm) and cohesive fracture toughness (GIC  = 25–1.0 kJ·m2) were varied.  Environmental conditioning (moisture exposure 2–10 hr and Temperature 25–45C) was included to assess durability effects. Key quantitative findings include that peak peel stress consistently occurs at the free edge of the overlap, while shear stress concentrates at the overlap ends. Increasing adhesive thickness from 0.2 to 1.0 mm reduced the peak peel stress (∼12.3 → 8.7 MPa, ≈ 29% reduction) while producing modest increases in shear strain.  The optimal joint performance occurred at an adhesive thickness ≈ 0.5 mm and GIC  ≈ 0.75 kJ·m2.  The experimentally measured maximum shear strength of ABSSSJ reached 18.4 MPa (for 0.5 mm adhesive), and the tensile strength for the best stacking sequence (G–S–G) was 62.3 MPa. The CZM–FEM and VM predictions agreed closely with experimental results (deviation ≤ 8%), demonstrating the predictive capability of the combined approach. Moisture and elevated temperature degraded cohesive stiffness and increased the peel stress by 8–15%, underscoring the importance of accounting for environmental effects in design. These results advance both the mechanistic understanding and engineering readiness of recyclable, natural–synthetic hybrid composites for lightweight automotive structures.

Keywords
computational modeling, adhesively bonded joints, peel and shear stress distribution, cohesive zone modeling, finite element analysis

Article Details

Supporting Agencies
The authors would like to thank Bahirdar Institute of Technology, BIT for access to research facilities and digital databases.
How to Cite
Molla, S. T., Tsegaw, A. A., Bogale, T. M., Ali, A. N., & Abebe, A. T. (2026). Computational and Experimental Investigation of Peel and Shear Stress Distribution in Adhesive bonded Hybrid Sisal-Glass Reinforced HDPE Composite for Automobile Side Body Panel. Research on Intelligent Manufacturing and Assembly, 5(1), 340-360. https://doi.org/10.25082/RIMA.2026.01.004

References

  1. Adams RD, Peppiatt NA. Stress analysis of adhesive-bonded lap joints. Journal of Strain Analysis. 1974, 9(3): 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1243/03093247v093185
  2. Karthikeyan N, Naveen J. Progress in adhesive-bonded composite joints: A comprehensive review. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2024, 44(19-20): 1844-1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844241248236
  3. Raj MKA, Kumar PM, Palanisamy P, et al. Study on the mechanical characteristics of a natural Fiber-based hybrid polymer composite. Scientific Reports. 2025, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29459-4
  4. Kaleel I, Carrera E, Petrolo M. Progressive delamination of laminated composites via 1D models. Composite Structures. 2020, 235: 111799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111799
  5. Moudood A, Rahman A, Khanlou HM, et al. Environmental effects on the durability and the mechanical performance of flax fiber/bio-epoxy composites. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2019, 171: 284-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.032
  6. da Silva LFM, Adams RD. Techniques to reduce the peel stresses in adhesive joints with composites. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2007, 27(3): 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.001
  7. Sahu P, Mishra PC. Combine experimental and FEM analysis of adhesive bonded single lap joint with Al-alloy flat adherends and pre-embedded artificial defects. SN Applied Sciences. 2019, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1535-8
  8. Monajati L, Vadean A, Boukhili R. Mechanical Behavior of Adhesively Bonded Joints Under Tensile Loading: A Synthetic Review of Configurations, Modeling, and Design Considerations. Materials. 2025, 18(15): 3557. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18153557
  9. Molla ST, Tsegaw AA, Bogale TM, et al. Computational analysis of stress distribution in adhesively bonded hybrid sisal-glass reinforced high-density polyethylene composite. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. Published online February 12, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844261419578
  10. Li C, Zhang Y, Zhang K, et al. Full‐Scale Cohesive Zone Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Debonding Behaviors in Root Joints for Wind Turbine Blades. Polymer Composites. 2025, 47(3): 2301-2313. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.70282
  11. Špirk S, Kalina T. Validated Cohesive Zone Models for Epoxy-Based Adhesive Joints Between Steel and CFRP Composites for Multimaterial Structural Design in Transportation Applications. Polymers. 2026, 18(3): 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030309
  12. Poodts E, Ghelli D, Brugo T, et al. Experimental characterization of a fiber metal laminate for underwater applications. Composite Structures. 2015, 129: 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.046
  13. Wei K, Chen Y, Li M, et al. Strength and Failure Mechanism of Composite‐Steel Adhesive Bond Single Lap Joints. Riccio A, ed. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2018, 2018(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5810180
  14. Kadioglu F, Avil E, Ercan ME, et al. Effects of different overlap lengths and composite adherend thicknesses on the performance of adhesively-bonded joints under tensile and bending loadings. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018, 369: 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/369/1/012034
  15. Bernardin P, Sedlacek F, Kozak J, et al. Identification of the Cohesive Parameters for Modelling of Bonded Joints between Flat Composite Adherends with Thick Layer of Adhesive. Materials. 2024, 17(19): 4880. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194880
  16. Liljedahl CDM, Crocombe AD, Wahab MA, et al. Damage modelling of adhesively bonded joints. International Journal of Fracture. 2006, 141(1-2): 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-006-0072-9
  17. da Silva RV, Voltz H, Filho AI, et al. Hybrid composites with glass fiber and natural fibers of sisal, coir, and luffa sponge. Journal of Composite Materials. 2020, 55(5): 717-728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320957725
  18. Caglar H, Idapalapati S, Sharma M, et al. Stress Analysis of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Lap Joints with Modified Adhesives at Various Temperatures. Journal of Composites Science. 2024, 8(10): 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8100406
  19. Yu Y, Pan Y, Zhou R, et al. Effects of Water and Alkaline Solution on Durability of Carbon-Glass Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars. Polymers. 2021, 13(21): 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213844
  20. Mendoza-Navarro LE, Diaz-Diaz A, Castañeda-Balderas R, et al. Interfacial failure in adhesive joints: Experiments and predictions. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2013, 44: 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.004
  21. Sun J, Zhang S, Xu L, et al. Simulation analysis method of adhesive bonding strength for steel-carbon fiber composites and its application in automotive B-pillars. Composites and Advanced Materials. 2025, 34: 26349833251392954. https://doi.org/10.1177/2634983325139295
  22. Sane AU, Padole PM, Manjunatha CM, et al. Mixed mode cohesive zone modelling and analysis of adhesively bonded composite T-joint under pull-out load. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2018, 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1056-1
  23. Gesese NA, Tesfay AG. Green hybrid composites for automotive roof applications: experimental study and design optimization using reused PET and jute fiber reinforcements. Composites and Advanced Materials. 2026, 35: 26349833261425661. https://doi.org/10.1177/2634983326142566
  24. Wu XF, Zhao Y, Zholobko O. Stress-Function Variational Method for Accurate Free-Edge Interfacial Stress Analysis of Adhesively Bonded Single-Lap Joints and Single-Sided Joints. Journal of Composites Science. 2021, 5(8): 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5080197
  25. Neves LFR, Campilho RDSG, Sánchez-Arce IJ, et al. Numerical Modelling and Validation of Mixed-Mode Fracture Tests to Adhesive Joints Using J-Integral Concepts. Processes. 2022, 10(12): 2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122730