Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Main Article Content

Jamie Heintz Benson
John R Slate corresponding author
Cynthia Martinez-Garcia
George W Moore
Frederick C Lunenburg

Abstract

In this investigation, the numbers and percentages of students who were enrolled in special education and who received a discipline consequence (i.e., in-school suspension, out-of-school suspension, expulsion, Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placement, and Juvenile Justice Education Program placement) during the 2012-2013 through 2015-2016 school years were determined. In each of these four school years, the number of students in special education who were assigned an exclusionary discipline assignment steadily decreased.  The percentages of the total exclusionary assignments given to students in special education, however, did not decrease but rather remained stable across the four school years.  Recommendations for research and implications are discussed along with suggestions for policy and practice.

Keywords
special education, discipline assignments, elementary and middle school grade levels

Article Details

How to Cite
Benson, J., Slate, J., Martinez-Garcia, C., Moore, G., & Lunenburg, F. (2020). A descriptive analysis of disciplinary consequence assignments to Grades 3 through 8 students in special education: A Texas statewide, multiyear investigation. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2020.02.003

References

  1. Leone PE, Mayer MJ and Malmgren K. School violence and disruption: rhetoric, reality, and reasonable balance. Focus on Exceptional Children, 2000, 33(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17161/fec.v33i1.6777
  2. The University of California, Center for Civil Rights Remedies, 2017. Civil Rights data collection, CA, 2011-2012. http://www.schooldisciplinedata.org/ccrr/resultsstate.php
  3. Benson JH and Slate JR. Discipline assignment inequities by the gender and ethnicity/race of Grade 9 students with a Learning Disability. Global Journal of Human Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 2017, 17(10): 1-7. https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS Volume17/1-Discipline -Assignment-Inequities.pdf
  4. Sullivan AL, Van Norman ER and Klingbeil DA. Exclusionary discipline of students with disabilities: Student and school characteristics predicting suspension. Remedial and Special Education, 2014, 35(4): 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513519825
  5. Allman KL and Slate JR. Disciplinary consequence effects on the achievement of students with disabilities: A statewide examination. Journal of Education Research, 2012, 6(4): 369-384.
  6. Allman KL and Slate JR. Disciplinary consequences assigned to students with Emotional Disorder, Learning Disability, or Other Health Impairment: Effects on their academic achievement. Journal of Education Research, 2013, 7(1): 83-101.
  7. Blair C and Scott KG. Proportion of LD placements associated with low socioeconomic status: Evidence for a gradient? Journal of Special Education, 2002, 36(1): 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669020360010201
  8. Tiger KN and Slate JR. Differences in discipline consequences as a function of economic status by gender. Journal of Ethical Educational Leadership, 2017, 4(3): 1-22.
  9. Allman KL and Slate JR. School discipline in public education: A brief review of current practices. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 2011, 6(2): 8.
  10. Curtiss KN and Slate JR. Differences in disciplinary consequences and reasons for Texas elementary students by gender. Journal of Education Research, 2014, 8(4): 203-210.
  11. Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.
  12. Texas Education Agency. Parent’s Guide to the Admission, review, and Dismissal Process, 2016. https://framework.esc18.net/Documents/ARD_Guide_ENG.pdf
  13. Texas Education Agency. Education Code 37. Alternative settings for behavior management, 2010. http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/ED/htm/ED.37.htm