Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Teachers’ self-efficacy: Associations with teacher and student characteristics and effects of the anger management intervention, the Mini-Diamond

Article Sidebar

Results of t-tests for the associations
Download PDF
Submitted   May 11, 2021
Published   Jul 16, 2021
Issue    Vol 2 No 2 (2021)
DOI   10.25082/AERE.2021.02.003

Views

3442

Downloads

1197

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Janni Niclasen
1. Frederikshøj skole og dagbehandling, Primulavej 2, 2720 Vanløse, Denmark; 2. Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Thea Toft Amholt corresponding author
Department of Sports Science and Blinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
Rhonwyn Carter
Department of Communication and Psychology, University of Aalborg, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
Jesper Dammeyer
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Abstract

Teacher self-efficacy (TSE) is the term used for teachers’ beliefs about their capacity to positively influence students’ learning and social environment. How TSE influences incidences of teacher burnout and student academic achievement has been the focus of previous research. Studies investigating the associations between TSE and socio-demographic characteristics are sparse, and little is known about the possible effects of school-based interventions on TSE. In order to address these areas of research, the aims of this study were twofold. First, the study examined associations between TSE and a) teachers’ socio-demographic characteristics, and b) student’s school-related well-being. Secondly, we investigated the effect of a school-based angermanagement intervention, the Mini-Diamond, on TSE. Students from grades 0 to 2 and their teachers, from all schools in two Danish municipalities, participated in the study. Teachers completed two questionnaires, including the Danish version of the Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale and a questionnaire on socio-demographic characteristics. All students filled out a school well-being questionnaire. The questionnaires were completed prior to and after the intervention. Positive associations were found between TSE and teachers’ age, showing that the older the teacher, the higher the TSE. Furthermore, positive associations between TSE and years of experience, as well as TSE and students’ school connectedness, were found. No effects were found of the school intervention on TSE.

Keywords
teaching, school intervention, school well-being, Mini-Diamond intervention, Bandura teacher self-efficacy scale

Article Details

Supporting Agencies
This work was supported by TrygFonden under grant numbers 114629 and 121941.
How to Cite
Niclasen, J., Amholt, T., Carter, R., & Dammeyer, J. (2021). Teachers’ self-efficacy: Associations with teacher and student characteristics and effects of the anger management intervention, the Mini-Diamond. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(2), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2021.02.003
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 1982, 37(2): 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
  2. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of Adolescents, 2006: 307-337
  3. Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2006, 1(2): 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
  4. Tschannen-Moran M and Hoy AW. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2001, 17(7): 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  5. Song H, Gu Q and Zhang Z. An exploratory study of teachers’ subjective wellbeing: Understanding the links between teachers’ income satisfaction, altruism, self-efficacy and work satisfaction. Teachers and teaching, theory and practice, 2020, 26(1): 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1719059
  6. Huang S, Yin H and Lv L. Job characteristics and teacher well-being: The mediation of teacher selfmonitoring and teacher self-efficacy. Educational psychology, 2019, 39(3): 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1543855
  7. Kennedy Y, Flynn N, O’Brien E, et al. Exploring the impact of Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management training on teacher psychological outcomes. Educational psychology in practice, 2021, 37(2): 150-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2021.1882944
  8. Zee M and Koomen HM. Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 2016, 86(4): 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
  9. Zee M, Koomen HMY and de Jong PF. How different levels of conceptualization and measurement affect the relationship between teacher self-efficacy and students’ academic achievement. Contemporary educational psychology, 2018, 55: 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.09.006
  10. Gulistan M, Hussain MA and Mushtaq M. Relationship between mathematics teachers’ self efficacy and students’ academic achievement at secondary level. Bulletin of education and research, 2017, 39(3): 171.
  11. Mahler D, Großschedl J, Harms U, et al. Does motivation matter? The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and enthusiasm and students’ performance. PloS one, 2018, 13(11): e0207252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207252
  12. Holzberger D, Philipp A, Kunter M, et al. How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of educational psychology, 2013, 105(3): 774-786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198
  13. Klassen RM and Chiu MM. Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2010, 102(3): 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237
  14. Wolters CA and Daugherty SG. Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2007, 99(1): 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.181
  15. Alvidrez J and Weinstein RS. Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999, 91(4): 731-746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.731
  16. Greenwood GE, Olejnik SF and Parkay FW. Relationships between four teacher efficacy belief patterns and selected teacher characteristics. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 1990, 23(2): 102-106.
  17. Okech AP. An exploratory examination of the relationships among emotional intelligence, elementary school science teacher self-efficacy, length of teaching experience, race/ethnicity, gender, and age. Texas A&M University, 2004.
  18. Zee M and Koomen HM. Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 2016, 86(4): 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
  19. Justice LM, Mashburn AJ, Hamre BK, et al. Quality of language and literacy instruction in preschool classrooms serving at-risk pupils. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2008, 23(1): 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.09.004
  20. Mohamadi FS and Asadzadeh H. Testing the mediating role of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in the relationship between sources of efficacy information and students achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2012, 13(3): 427-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9203-8
  21. Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Steca P, et al. Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 2006, 44(6): 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
  22. Midgley C, Feldlaufer H and Eccles JS. Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 1989, 16(4): 981-992. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.ep9676559
  23. Woolfolk AE, Rosoff B and Hoy WK. Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1990, 6(2): 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(90)90031-Y
  24. Dembo MH and Gibson S. Teachers’ sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 1985, 86(2): 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1086/461441
  25. Yoon JS. Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 2004, 27(1): 37-45. https://doi.org/10.2172/4338106
  26. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan, 1997.
  27. Niclasen J, Keilow M and Obel C. Psychometric properties of the Danish student well-being questionnaire assessed in ¿250,000 student responders. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2018, 46(8): 877-885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494818772645
  28. Liu J, Dammeyer J, Amholt TA, et al. Evaluation of the Anger Management Intervention Program, the Mini-Diamond, targeted primary school students: A controlled trial with focus on well-being. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1910558
  29. Skolesundhed.dk. (2019). BørnUngeLiv.dk Børne og Ungeportalen. https://www.boernungeliv.dk/Public/Forside.aspx
  30. Komiteen for Sundhedsoplysning. (2019). Komiteen for Sundhedsoplysning. http://www.sundhedsformidling.dk
  31. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, et al. The R Development Core Team (2013) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version, 2011, 3: 1-97.
  32. Dressler M and Obel C. Vredesh°andtering i indskolingen og børnehaven – forst°a og h°andter følelserne i fællesskab. Saxo, 2017.
  33. Chereji SV, Pintea S and David D. The relationship of anger and cognitive distortions with violence in violent offenders’ population: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2012, 4(1): 59-77.
  34. Novaco RW and Taylor JL. Reduction of assaultive behavior following anger treatment of forensic hospital patients with intellectual disabilities. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2015, 65: 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.001
  35. Veenstra L, Bushman BJ and Koole SL. The facts on the furious: A brief review of the psychology of trait anger. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2018, 19: 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.014
  36. Knobloch N and Whittington MS. Novice teachers’ perceptions of support, teacher preparation quality, and student teaching experience related to teacher efficacy. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 2002, 27(3): 331-341. https://doi.org/10.5328/JVER27.3.331
  37. Song J and Park M. Emotional scaffolding and teacher identity: Two mainstream teachers’ mobilizing emotions of security and excitement for young English learners. International Multilingual Research Journal, 2021, 15(3): 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2021.1883793
  38. Yagil D. If anything can go wrong it will: Occupational stress among inexperienced teachers. International Journal of Stress Management, 1998, 5(3): 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022993015970
  39. Herppich S, Wittwer J, N¨uckles M, et al. Addressing knowledge deficits in tutoring and the role of teaching experience: Benefits for learning and summative assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2014, 106(4): 934-945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036076
  40. Topchyan R and Woehler C. Do teacher status, gender, and years of teaching experience impact job satisfaction and work engagement? Education and Urban Society, 2021, 53(2): 119-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124520926161
  41. Niebrand C, Horn E and Holmes R. Insecurity, confusion: Common complaints of the first-year teacher. NASSP Bulletin, 1992, 76(546): 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659207654615
  42. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (pp. 1-3). American Cancer Society, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836
  43. LoCasale-Crouch J, Davis E, Wiens P, et al. The Role of the Mentor in Supporting New Teachers: Associations with Self-Efficacy, Reflection, and Quality. Mentoring and Tutoring, 2012, 20(3): 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.701959
  44. Wilson MS and Liu JH. Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2003, 42(2): 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127175
  45. Ickes W, Gesn PR and Graham T. Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 2000, 7(1): 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006.x
  46. Cinici A. Pre-service teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs: The influence of a collaborative peer Microteaching Program. Mentoring & Tutoring for Partnership in Learning, 2016, 24(3): 228-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1222812
  47. Meiklejohn J, Phillips C, Freedman ML, et al. Integrating Mindfulness Training into K-12 Education: Fostering the Resilience of Teachers and Students. Mindfulness, 2012, 3(4): 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0094-5
  48. Siegle D and McCoach DB. Increasing student mathematics self-efficacy through teacher training. Journal of Advanced Academics, 2007, 18(2): 278-312. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2007-353