Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Effectiveness of mesoporous bioglass in drug delivery

Article Sidebar

Initial Bust Release
Download PDF
Submitted   May 16, 2022
Published   Jun 27, 2022
Issue    Vol 4 No 1 (2022)
DOI   10.25082/JPBR.2022.01.004

Views

1285

Downloads

565

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Sheila Galbreath
Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA
Bailey Krueger
Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA
Taylor Frazier
Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA
Tarun Goswami corresponding author
Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA

Abstract

Since the invention of bioactive glass 50 years ago, it has become a versatile material used in healthcare in a variety of applications and compositions.  Bioactive glass has shown superior capabilities of drug delivery compared to traditional carriers. For example, time-released medications are less likely to reach toxic levels, while delivering a specific, therapeutic dose to a localized area. The objective of this paper is to investigate the properties and effectiveness of mesoporous bioglass (MBG) as a drug delivery carrier. A literature review of various polymer coated 45S5 Bioglass® loaded with vancomycin was analyzed to determine their drug release response. Since MBG continues to be a preferred carrier with numerous combinations; size, coating, doped with ions, medications, and other physical conditions, there is a need to understand more fully their effectiveness. For a given loading efficiency of 5-15% the burst release % for day 1 remained 15-30% for given surface area, pore volume and pore size of 3.5 to 5 nm. The mechanical properties summarized in this paper are compared with the drug release kinetics. In general, for a given fracture toughness and compressive strength, the ratio of Young’s modulus to bending strength around 250 determined poor apatite mineralization resulting in slow release. As this ratio increased the apatite mineralization and dissolution rate increased. Doping MBG with ions enhanced the drug efficacy to treat a particular condition, for example, silver. Polymer coated MBG exhibited slower dissolution rate than uncoated MBG. Dissolution time increased with the drug loading rate, drying time of the coating, multi-layer coats of drug and polymer for the drug studied in this paper to more than 50%.

Keywords
dissolution, kinetics, MBG, polymer coats, loading rate, time to release

Article Details

How to Cite
Galbreath, S., Krueger, B., Frazier, T., & Goswami, T. (2022). Effectiveness of mesoporous bioglass in drug delivery. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Research, 4(1), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.25082/JPBR.2022.01.004
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Baino F, Hamzehlou S and Kargozar S. Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 2018, 9(25): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010025
  2. Jones RJ, Brauer DS, HupaL, et al. Bioglass and Bioactive Glasses and Their Impact on. International Journal of Applied Glass Scienc, 2016, 7(4): 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.12252
  3. Baino F, Fiume E, Barberi J, et al. Processing methods for making porous bioactive glass-based scaffolds-A state-of-the-art review. American Ceramic Society, 2019, 16: 1762-1796. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13195
  4. Brauer ds. Bioactive Glasses-Structure and Properties. Bkioactive Glasses, 2015, 54: 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201405310
  5. Kaur G, Kumar V, Baino F, et al. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: State-of-the-art review and future challenges. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 104(C): 109895-109895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.109895
  6. Izquierdo-Barba I and Vallet-Reg´ı M. Mesoporous bioactive glasses: Relevance of their. Biomedical Glasses, 2015, 1(1): 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2015-0014
  7. Migneco C, Fiume E, E Vern´e, et al. A Guided Walk through the World of Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses (MBGs): Fundamentals, Processing and Applications. Nanomaterials, 2020, 10(12): 2571. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122571
  8. Xia W and Chang J. Bioactive glass scaffold with similar structure and mechanical properties of cancellous bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials, 2010, 95B(2): 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31736
  9. Cabanas-Polo S and Boccaccini AR. Understanding Bioactive Glass Powder Suspensions for Electrophoretic Deposition of Bioactive Glass-Polymer Coatings. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2015, 162(11): 3077-3083. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0211511jes
  10. Wu C and Chang J. Mesoporous bioactive glasses: structure characteristics, drug/growth factor delivery and bone regeneration application. Interface Focus, 2012, 2(3): 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0121
  11. Li Y, Liu YZ, Long T, et al. Mesoporous bioactive glass as a drug delivery system: fabrication, bactericidal properties and biocompatibility. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2013, 24(8): 1951-1961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4960-z
  12. Subhapradha N, Abudhahir M, Aathira A, et al. Polymer coated mesoporous ceramic for drug delivery in bone tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 110: 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.146
  13. Sigma M. Drug Delivery FAQs. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com
  14. Xiao H and Brazel CS. On the importance and mechanisms of burst release in matrix-controlled drug delivery systems. 2001, 73(2-3): 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00248-6
  15. Quantachrome Instruments. Measuring Paticle Surface Area by Gas Sorpton. https://www.quantachrome.com
  16. Dictionary.com. Definition of volume. Available: https:// https://www.dictionary.com
  17. Mar´ıa C, Tess G, Katilayne V, et al. Photopolymerization for Filling Porous Ceramic Matrix: Improvement of Mechanical Properties and Drug Delivering Behavior. Polymer Composites, 2018, 40(4): 1654-1662. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24914
  18. Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 2006, 17(11): 967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z
  19. Wei Li, Ding Y, Rai R, et al. Preparation and characterization of PHBV microsphere/45S5 bioactive glass composite scaffolds with vancomycin releasing function. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2014, 41: 320-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.04.052
  20. Motealleh A, Eqtesadi S, Perera FH, et al. Understanding the role of dip-coating process parameters in the mechanical performance of polymer-coated bioglass robocast scaffolds. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2016, 64: 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.004
  21. Nawawi N, Alqap ASF and Sopyan L. Recent Progress on Hydroxyapatite-Based Dense Biomaterials for Load Bearing Bone Substitutes. Recent Patents on Materials Science, 2011, 4(1): 63-80. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874465611104010063
  22. Combes C, Cazalbou S and Rey C. Apatite Biominerals. Minerals, 2016, 6(2): 2-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6020034
  23. Kaur G. Biomedical, Therapeutic and Clinical Applications of Bioactive Glasses, Duxford: Woodhead Publishing, 2019.
  24. Zhang X, Zeng D, Li N, et al. Functionalized mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for enhanced bone tissue regeneration. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 19361. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19361
  25. University of Cambridge. Mechnical properties of bone. https://www.doitpoms.ac.uk
  26. Su J, Cao L, Yu B, et al. Composite scaffolds of mesoporous bioactive. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2012, 7: 2547-2555. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S29819
  27. Ramiro-Guti´errez ML, Will J and Boccaccini AR. Reticulated bioactive scaffolds with improved textural properties for bone tissue engineering: Nanostructured surfaces and porosity. Jpurnal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2014, 102(9): 2982-2992. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34968
  28. Cauda V, Fiorilli S, Onida B, et al. SBA-15 ordered mesoporous silica inside a bioactive glass-ceramic scaffold for local drug delivery. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 2008, 19(10): 3303-3310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3468-4
  29. Boffito M, Pontremoli C, Fiorilli S, et al. Injectable Thermosensitive Formulation Based on Polyurethane Hydrogel/Mesoporous Glasses for Sustained Co-Delivery of Functional Ions and Drugs. Pharmaceutics, 2019, 11(10): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11100501
  30. Yao Q, Nooeaid P, Roether JA, et al. Bioglass-based scaffolds incorporating polycaprolactone and chitosan coatings for controlled vancomycin delivery. Ceramics International, 2013, 39(7): 7517- 7522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.03.002
  31. Rivadeneira J and Gorustovich A. Bioactive glasses as delivery systems for antimicrobial agents. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2016, 122(6): 1424-1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13393
  32. Huirache-Acua R, Nava R, Peza-Ledesma CL, et al. SBA-15 Mesoporous Silica as Catalytic Support for Hydrodesulfurization Catalysts—Review. Materials, 2013, 6(9): 4139-4167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6094139
  33. Agrawal CM, Ong JG, Appleford MR, et al. Introduction to Biomaterials: Basic Theory with Engineering Applications, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035545
  34. Britannica. Young’s modulus. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com
  35. Britannica. compressive strength test. Encyclopaedia of Britannica. https://www.britannica.com
  36. Pawelec KM, White AA and Best SM. Properties and characterization of bone repair materials. in Bone Repair Biomaterial 2nd edition, Kidlington, Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, 2019, 65-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102451-5.00004-4
  37. O’Hara R and Dunne BN. 2-Injectable calcium phosphate cements for spinal bone repair. in Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: Novel Techniques and Applications, Kidlington, Woodhead Publishing, 2014, 26-61. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098104.1.26
  38. Johnson L. How to Calculate Flexural Strength. https://sciencing.com
  39. Ordikhani F and Simchi A. Long-term antibiotic delivery by chitosan-based composite coatings with bone regenerative potential. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 317: 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.197
  40. Ordikhani F, Zustiak SP and Simchi A. Surface Modifications of Titanium Implants by Multilayer Bioactive Coatings with Drug Delivery Potential: Antimicrobial, Biological, and Drug Release Studies. Journal of Medicine, 2016, 68: 1100-1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1840-2
  41. Wei LA, Pn A, Jar B, et al. Preparation and characterization of vancomycin releasing PHBV coated 45S5 Bioglass-based glass–ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering - ScienceDirect. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2014, 34(2): 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.08.032
  42. Yao Q, Nooeaid P, Roether JA, et al. Bioglass-based scaffolds incorporating polycaprolactone and chitosan coatings for controlled vancomycin delivery. Ceramics International, 2013, 39(7): 7517- 7522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.03.002