Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Main Article Content

John S. Saroyancorresponding author
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9110-6393

Abstract

Children with peer acceptance problems struggle to fit in among classmates and often feel rejection and social isolation.  Common reasons can stem from a child’s unique personality, individuality or special needs issues.  These children often experience emotional problems and symptoms resulting from poor social relationships and difficulty fitting in to their environment.  Within the classroom, teachers may provide encouragement and support for these children as well as their better adjusted peers, helping them equally engage through improved understanding and acceptance.  In this article, a cooperative classroom approach is discussed to help students develop healthier communication with mutual respect and the freedom to be their natural, core self.  A Democratic Student Council is presented as a cooperative classroom activity that encourages peer compassion and openness while supporting individuality and feelings of belonging.

Keywords
social acceptance, bullying, core self, cooperative learning, student council, belonging

Article Details

How to Cite
Saroyan, J. (2021). Developing a supportive peer environment: Engaging students through cooperative skills in the classroom. Advances in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.25082/ADEP.2021.01.001

References

  1. Abramczyk, A. & Jurkowski, S. (2020). Cooperative learning as an evidence-based teaching strategy: What teachers know, believe, and how they use it. Journal of Education forTeaching, 46(3), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1733402
  2. Benner, A. D., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Boyle, A. E., Polk, R., & Cheng, Y. (2018). Racial/ethnic discrimination and well-being during adolescence: A meta-analytic review. American Psychologist, 73(7), 855-883. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000204
  3. Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00157
  4. Bierman, K. L. (2003). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. New York: The Guilford Press.
  5. Bridgett, D. J., Gartstein, M. A., Putnam, S. P., McKay, T., Iddins, E., Robertson, C., Ramsay, & K., Ritmueller, A. (2009). Maternal and contextualinfluences and the effect of temperament development during infancy on parenting in toddlerhood. Infant Behavior & Development, 32(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.10.007
  6. Brooks, B. A., Floyd, F., Robins, D. L., & Chan, W. Y. (2015).Extracurricular activities and the development of social skills in children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59(7), 678-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12171
  7. Capodieci, A., Rivetti, T., & Cornoldi, C. (2019). A cooperative learning classroom intervention for increasing peer’s acceptance of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 23(3), 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054716666952
  8. Chess, S. & Thomas A. (1977). Temperamental individuality from childhood to adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 16(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60038-8
  9. Chiffriller, S. H., Kangos, K. A., & Milone, L. (2015). What elementary students experience outside of the classroom: Children’s responses to social exclusion. Journal of School Counseling, 13(1), 1-25.
  10. Cranham J., & Carroll A. (2003). Dynamics within the bully ⁄ victim paradigm: A qualitative analysis. Educational Psychology in Practice, 19, 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360303235
  11. Costa, U. M., Brauchle, G., & Kennedy-Behr, A. (2017). Collaborative goal setting with and for children as part of therapeutic intervention. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(16), 1589-1600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1202334
  12. DeWall, N. & Bushman, B.J. (2011). Social acceptance and rejection: The sweet and the bitter. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 256-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411417545
  13. Dreikurs, R. & Soltz, V. (1964). Children: The challenge. New York: Hawthorn Books.
  14. Elliott, R. (2001). The effectiveness of humanistic therapies: A meta-analysis. In D. J. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic psychotherapies: Handbook of research and practice (pp. 55-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  15. Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Promoting prosocial behavior and self-regulatory skills in preschool children through a mindfulness-based kindness curriculum. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038256
  16. Friedman, H. S. & Schustack, M. W. (2016). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research. USA: Pearson Education.
  17. Garrote, A., Dessemontet, R. S., & Opitz, E. M. (2017). Facilitating the social participation of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools: A review of school-based interventions. Educational Research Review, 20, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.001
  18. Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Kiraly, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755-755. https://doi.org/10.1038/415755a
  19. Glew, G., Rivara, F., & Feudtner, C. (2000). Bullying: Children hurting children. Pediatrics in Review, 21, 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.21-6-183
  20. Griebler, U. & Nowak, P. (2012). Student councils: A tool for health promoting schools? Characteristics and effects. Health Education, 112, 105-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/09654281211203402
  21. Hart, R. (2010). Classroom behavior management: Educational psychologists’ view on effective practice. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 15(4), 353-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2010.523257
  22. Haun, D. B. M. & Tomasello, M. (2011). Conformity to peer pressure in preschool children. Child Development, 82(6), 1759-1767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01666.x
  23. Hayley, F. & Harrington, I. (2019). A review into effective classroom management and strategies for student engagement: Teacher and student roles in today’s classrooms. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(12), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i12.4491
  24. Hochman, J. M., Carter, E. W., Bottema-Beutel, K., Harvey, M. N., & Gustafson, J. R. (2015). Efficacy of peer networks to increase social connections among high school students with and without autism spectrum disorder. Exceptional Children, 82, 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585482
  25. Johnson R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2008). Active learning: Cooperation in the classroom. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 47, 29-30. https://doi.org/10.5926/arepj1962.47.0_29
  26. Karevold, E. B., Mathiesen, K. S., B°ardstu, S., & Sanson, A. V. (2018). Temperament and personality development in children and adolescents. In K. S. Mathiesen, A. V. Sanson, & E. B. Karevold (Eds.), Tracking opportunities and problems from infancy to adulthood: 20 years with the TOPP study (pp. 39-54). Boston, MA, US: Hogrefe Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1027/00543-000
  27. Kim, E. B., Chuansheng, C., Smetana, J. G., & Greenberger, E. (2016). Does children’s moral compass waver under social pressure? Using the conformity paradigm to test preschoolers’ moral and social-conventional judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.006
  28. King, K. M., McLaughlin, K. A., Silk, J., & Monahan, K. C. (2018). Peer effects on self-regulation in adolescence depend on the nature and quality of the peer interaction. Development and Psychopathology, 30(4), 1389-1401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417001560
  29. Leigers, K., Kleinert, H., & Carter, E. W. (2017). “I never truly thought about them having friends”: Equipping schools to foster peer relationships. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 36, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517707711
  30. MacDonald, H., & Swart, E. (2004). The culture of bullying at a primary school. Education as Change, 8(2), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823200409487090
  31. McAdams, D., & Olson, B (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 517-542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507
  32. Mikami, A. Y, Boucher, M. A. & Humphreys, K. (2005). Prevention of peer rejection through a classroom-level intervention in middle school. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-004-0988-7
  33. Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L. (2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 415- 431. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012958
  34. Nave, C., Sherman, R., Funder,D., Hampson, S., & Goldberg, L. (2010). On the contextual independence of personality: Teachers’ assessments predict directly observed behavior after forty decades. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1(4), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610370717
  35. Nie Y., & Lau, S. (2009). Complementary roles of care and behavioral control in classroom management: The self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 185-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.03.001
  36. O’Hanlon, J. & Ferriter, K. (1996). Humanistic and integrative group therapy. Inside Out: The Irish Journal for Humanistic and Integrative Psychotherapy, 25, 2.
  37. Okilwa, N. S. A., & Shelby, L. (2010). The effects of peer tutoring on academic performance of students with disabilities in grades 6 through 12: A synthesis of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509355991
  38. Piercy, M., Wilton, K. & Townsend, M. (2002). Promoting the social acceptance of young children with moderate-severe intellectual disabilities using cooperative-learning techniques. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 107(5), 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2002)107h0352:PTSAOYi2.0.CO;2
  39. Putnam, J., Markovchick, K., Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (1996). Cooperative learning and peer acceptance of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Social Psychology,136(6), 741-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9712250
  40. Rogers, C. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In (ed.) S. Koch, Psychology: A study of a science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the person and the social context. New York: McGraw Hill.
  41. Rose, C. A., & Monda-Amaya, L. E. (2012). Bullying and victimization among students with disabilities: Effective strategies for classroom teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451211430119
  42. Rossetti, Z. & Keenan, J. (2017). The nature of friendship between students with and without severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education. Prepublished April 4, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517703713
  43. Schwartz, D., Lansford, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2015). Peer victimization during middle childhood as a lead indicator of internalizing problems and diagnostic outcomes in late adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.881293
  44. Schwier, C., van Maanen, C., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Rational imitation in 12-monthold infants. Infancy, 10, 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in1003_6
  45. Shechtman, Z. & Pastor, R. (2005). Cognitive-behavioral and humanistic group treatment for children with learning disabilities: A comparison of outcomes and process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.322
  46. Simpson, L. & Bui Y. (2017). Reading Buddies: A strategy to increase peer interaction in students with autism. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(1), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217692570
  47. Slavin, R. (1987). Cooperative learning: Where behavioural and humanistic approaches to classroom management meet. The Elementary School Journal, 88(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1086/461521
  48. Smokowski, P. R., & Kopasz, K. H. (2005). Bullying in school: An overview of types, effects, family charactersitics, and intervention strategies. Children & Schools, 27(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/27.2.101
  49. Soheili, F., Alizadeh, H., Murphy, J. M., Hossein, S. B., & Ferguson, E. D. (2015). Teachers as leaders: The impact of Adler-Dreikurs classroom management techniques on students’ perceptions of the classroom environment and on academic achievement. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(4), 440-461. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0037
  50. Thornberg, R. (2011). ”She’s weird”-the social construction of bullying in school: A review of qualitative research. Children and Society, 25(4), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00374.x
  51. Turner, R. N. & Cameron, L. (2016). Confidence in contract: A new perspective on promoting cross-group friendship among children and adolescents. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 212-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12023
  52. Van Ryzin, M. J. & Roseth, C. J. (2018). Cooperative learning in middle school: A means to improve peer relations and reduce victimization, bullying, and related outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1192-1201. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000265
  53. Vaquera, E., & Kao, G. (2008). Do you like me as much as I like you? Friendship reciprocity and its effects on school outcomes among adolescents. Social Science Research, 37, 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.11.002
  54. Wentzel, K.R. & Watkins, D. E. (2002). Peer relationships and collaborative learning as contexts for academic enablers. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 366-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086161
  55. Wesselman, E. D., Wirth, J. H., & Bernstein, M. J. (2017). Expectations of social inclusion and exclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00112