Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Identifying mastery goal states in educational contexts

Main Article Content

David Palmer corresponding author


The purpose of this study was to investigate mastery goal states that students might spontaneously adopt in individual lessons. Interviews were carried out with 32 grade 10 students, who were asked about a recent lesson they had experienced. Responses indicated that positive mastery goal states could be represented by a situated and dynamic feeling of “wanting to learn”. However, students also reported a feeling of “not wanting to learn”. This latter form did not fit any of the existing dimensions of achievement goals, so it was decided to refer to it as a negative mastery goal state. The positive and negative dimensions were educationally significant because they were highly correlated with students’ self-reported learning behaviors during that lesson.

achievement, goal theory, interview, motivation, secondary education

Article Details

How to Cite
Palmer, D. (2019). Identifying mastery goal states in educational contexts. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(1), 6-11.


  1. Ames C. Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992, 84(3): 261- 271.
  2. Elliot AJ. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 1999, 34: 169-189.
  3. Linnenbrink EA and Pintrich PR. Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 2002, 37(2): 69-78.
  4. Pintrich PR. Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, 92(3): 544-555.
  5. Levy I, Kaplan A and Patrick H. Early adolescents achievement goals, social status, and attitudes towards cooperation with peers. Social Psychology of Education, 2004, 7(2): 127-159.
  6. Karabenick SA. Seeking help in large college classes: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2003, 28(1): 37-58.
  7. King RB, Ganotice FA and Watkins DA. A cross-cultural analysis of achievement and social goals among Chinese and Filipino students. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 2014, 17(3): 439-455.
  8. Patrick H and Yoon C. Early adolescents’ motivation during science investigation. Journal of Educational Research, 2004, 97(6): 319-328.
  9. Baranik LE, Stanley LJ, Bynum BH, et al. Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 2010, 23(3): 265- 284.
  10. Van Ypere NW, Elliot AJ and Anseel F. The influence of mastery-avoidance goals on performance improvement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2009, 39(6): 932-943.
  11. Van Yperen NW, Blaga M and Postmes T. A meta-analysis of the impact of situationally-induced achievement goals on task performance. Human Performance,2015, 28(2), 165- 183.
  12. Linnenbrink-Garcia L, Middleton MJ, Ciani KD, et al. The strength of the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations: Theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications. Educational Psychologist, 2012, 47(4): 281-301.
  13. Harackiewicz JM, Barron KE, Tauer JM, et al. Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, 92(2): 316-330.
  14. Chalabaev A, Major B, Sarrazin P, et al. When avoiding failure improves performance: Stereotype threat and the impact of performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 2012, 36(2): 130-142.
  15. Senko C and Harackiewicz JM. Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, 97(3): 320-336.
  16. Middleton MJ, Kaplan A and Midgley C. The change in middle school students’ achievement goals in mathematics over time. Social Psychology of Education, 2004, 7(3): 289- 311.
  17. Senko C and Harackiewicz JM. Performance goals: The moderating roles of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2002, 38(6): 603-610.
  18. Avery RE and Smillie LD. The impact of achievement goal states on working memory. Motivation and Emotion, 2013, 37: 39-49.
  19. Nieswandt M and Shanahan MC. “I just want the credit!” Perceived instrumentality as the main characteristic of boys’ motivation in a grade 11 science course. Research in Science Education, 2008, 38: 3-29.
  20. Zimmerman BJ and Cleary TJ. Motives to self-regulate learning. In Wentzel K & Wigfield A (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School. Hoboken: Routledge, 2009: 247-264.
  21. Chen C. Incremental validity of achievement goals in predicting subjective well-being among university students. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2015, 14(1): 38-62.
  22. Turner JC and Patrick H. How does motivation develop and why does it change? Reframing motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 2008, 43: 119-131.
  23. Lizzio A, Wilson K and Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 2002, 27(1): 27-52.
  24. Biggs J. What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1993, 63(1): 3-19.