Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Educational robotics and STEAM in early childhood education

Main Article Content

Dimitra Chaldi corresponding author
Garyfalia Mantzanidou


The interest in the future configuration, focusing on the innovative technologies and more specifically on STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Math), is remarkably increased. The value of STEAM education is undeniable as a means of developing basic skills and competencies of young students improving the learning process, developing communication skills, and solving real-life difficulties. The current research study was completed in the context of an actual learning process, with the view to study educational robotics in kindergarten students to engage them with STEAM education, using the programmable robot Bee-Bot® initially. The didactic intervention was held, which was developed in two phases. More specifically, a sample of 12 children (age range: 5–6 years old) took part in an intensive educational robotics lab for 16 sessions (4 weeks) by using a bee-shaped robot called Bee-Bot®. The results of our current research study revealed that STEAM education could also take place in a speech therapy clinic using the appropriate educational robots. Our young students developed and mastered knowledge in programming and computerizing, and algorithmic thinking with playful mod using educational robots, and they also built their vocabulary and develop communication skills.

STEAM, education robotics, kindergarten, programming, Bee-Bot®

Article Details

How to Cite
Chaldi, D., & Mantzanidou, G. (2021). Educational robotics and STEAM in early childhood education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 72-81.


  1. Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational Robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63-71.
  2. Bers, M. U. (2008). Blocks to Robots Learning with Technology in the Early Childhood Classroom. Teachers College Press.
  3. Bertel, L. B., Brooks, E., & Dau, S. (2019). Robot-Supported Inclusion and Learning: A Case Study on the KUBO Robot in Early Childhood Education. In Global Challenges in Assistive Technology: Research, Policy & Practice, AAATE, 2019.
  4. Caballero-Gonzalez, Y. A., Mu˜noz-Repiso, A. G. V., & Garc´ıa-Holgado, A. (2019). Learning computational thinking and social skills development in young children through problem solving with educational robotics. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 19-23). ACM.
  5. Chatzopoulos, A., Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., Papoutsidakis, M., Elza, D., & Psycharis, S. (2021). DuBot: An Open-Source, Low-Cost Robot for STEM and Educational Robotics. In Handbook of Research on Using Educational Robotics to Facilitate Student Learning (pp. 441-465). IGI Global.
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge.
  7. Demetriou, K., & Nikiforidou, Z. (2019). The relational space of educational technology: Early childhood students’ views. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(4), 290-305.
  8. Di Lieto, M.C., Inguaggiato, E., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dell’Omo, M., Laschi, C., Pecini, C., Santerini, G., Sgandurra, G., & Dario, P. (2017). Educational robotics intervention on executive functions in preschool children: a pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 16-23.
  9. Donohue, C., & Schomburg, R. (2017). Technology and interactive media in early childhood programs: What we’ve learned from five years of research, policy, and practice. YC Young Children, 72(4), 72-78.
  10. Duncan, C., Bell, T., & Tanimoto, S. (2014). Should your 8-year-old learn coding? In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE ’14) (pp. 60-69), 05-07, Nov, Berlin, Germany. ACM.
  11. Eguchi, A. (2010). What is Educational Robotics? Theories behind it and practical implementation. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, (pp. 4006-4014). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 28, 202.
  12. Falloon, G. (2016). An analysis of young students’ thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. on the iPad. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 576-593.
  13. Fesakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87-97.
  14. Garc´ıa-Pe˜nalvo, F. J., Rees, A. M., Hughes, J., Jormanainen, I., Toivonen, T., & Vermeersch, J. (2016). A survey of resources for introducing coding into schools, In F. J. Garc´ıa-Pe˜nalvo (Ed), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Technological Eco-systems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM ’16), pp. 19-26. Salamanca Spain, November 2 -4, 2016. New York, NY, USA: ACM
  15. Garc´ıa-Valc´arcel-Mu˜noz-Repiso, A., & Caballero-Gonz´alez, Y. A. (2019). Robotics to develop computational thinking in early Childhood Education. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 27(59), 63-72.
  16. Glezou, K. V. (2020). Fostering Computational Thinking and Creativity in Early Childhood Education: Play-Learn-Construct-Program-Collaborate. In Mobile Learning Applications in Early Childhood Education (pp. 324-347). IGI Global.
  17. Heljakka, K., Iham¨aki, P., Tuomi, P., & Saarikoski, P. (2019). Gamified Coding: Toy Robots and Playful Learning in Early Education. In 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) (pp. 800-805). IEEE.
  18. Highfield, K. (2019). Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(2), 22-27.
  19. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  20. Karakoyun, F., & Lindberg, O. J. (2020). Preservice teachers’ views about the twenty-first century skills: A qualitative survey study in Turkey and Sweden. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2353-2369.
  21. Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14-31.
  22. Kim, J., Gilbert, J., Yu, Q., & Gale, C. (2021). Measures Matter: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Educational Apps on Preschool to Grade 3 Children’s Literacy and Math Skills. AERA Open 7(1), 1-19.
  23. Mantzanidou, G. (2019). Educational Robotics in Kindergarten, a Case Study. Robotics in Education - Current Research and Innovations, 52-58. Springer.
  24. Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019), Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), 1-16.
  25. Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2015). Barriers to the integration of computers in early childhood settings: Teachers’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 285-301.
  26. Noh, J., & Lee, J. (2020). Effects of robotics programming on the computational thinking and creativity of elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 463-484.
  27. Papadakis, S. (2021). The Impact of Coding Apps to Support Young Children in Computational Thinking and Computational Fluency. Frontiers in Education, 6: e657895.
  28. Papadakis, S. (2020a). Robots and robotics kits for early childhood and first school age. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(18), 34-56.
  29. Papadakis, S. (2020b). Evaluating a Teaching Intervention for Teaching STEM and Programming Concepts Through the Creation of a Weather-Forecast App for Smart Mobile Devices. In Handbook of Research on Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking in P-12 Education (pp. 31-53). IGI Global.
  30. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2017). Evaluation of Greek Android mobile applications for preschoolers. Preschool and Primary Education, 5, 65-100.
  31. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of a game-based learning approach in modifying students’ behavioural outcomes and competence, in an introductory programming course. A case study in Greece. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 10(3), 235-250.
  32. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020a). Learning computational thinking development in young children with Bee-Bot educational robotics. In Handbook of research on tools for teaching computational thinking in P-12 education (pp. 289-309). IGI Global.
  33. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020b). Exploring Preservice Teachers’ Attitudes About the Usage of Educational Robotics in Preschool Education. In Handbook of Research on Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking in P-12 Education (pp. 339-355). IGI Global.
  34. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (Eds.). (2019). Mobile learning applications in early childhood education. IGI Global.
  35. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 5-18.
  36. Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Attitudes towards the Use of Educational Robotics: Exploring Pre-Service and In-Service Early Childhood Teacher Profiles. Education Sciences, 11(5), 204.
  37. Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vassilakis, K. (2021, April). Factors That Hinder in-Service Teachers from Incorporating Educational Robotics into Their Daily or Future Teaching Practice. In CSEDU (2) (pp. 55-63).
  38. Petousi, V., & Sifaki, E. (2020). Contextualizing harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from discourse analysis of scientific publications, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23(3-4), 149-174.
  39. Pugnali, A., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2017). The impact of user interface on young children’s computational thinking. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16, 171-193.
  40. Scaradozzi, D., Sorbi, L., Pedale, A., Valzano, M., Vergine, C. (2015). Teaching robotics at the primary school: an innovative approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3838-3846.
  41. Stoeckelmayr, K., Tesar, M., & Hofmann, A. (2011). Kindergarten children programming robots: a first attempt. In Proc. International conference on robotics in education (pp. 185-192). Technologies nouvelles et ´education, Paris.
  42. Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade.
  43. Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2018). Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 325-346.
  44. Tzagkaraki, E., Papadakis, St., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Exploring the Use of Educational Robotics in primary school and its possible place in the curricula. In M. Malvezzi, D. Alimisis, & M. Moro (Eds). Education in & with Robotics to Foster 21st Century Skills. Proceedings of Edurobotics 2020, Online Conference February 25-26, 2021, 216-229, Switzerland, Cham: Springer.
  45. Urlings, C. C., Coppens, K.M., & Borghans, L. (2019). Measurement of Executive Functioning Using a Playful Robot in Kindergarten. Computers in the Schools, 36(4), 255-273.
  46. Vidakis, N., Barianos, A. K., Trampas, A. M., Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vassilakis, K. (2019). in-Game Raw Data Collection and Visualization in the Context of the “ThimelEdu” Educational Game. In International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 629-646). Springer, Cham.
  47. Vlasopoulou, M., Kalogiannakis, M., & Sifaki, E. (2021). Investigating Teachers’ Attitude and Behavioral Intentions for the Impending Integration of STEM Education in Primary School. In St. Papadakis and M. Kalogiannakis (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Using Education Robotics to Facilitate Student Learning (pp. 235-256). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  48. Yelland, N. (2011). Reconceptualising play and learning in the lives of young children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 4-12.