Open Access Peer-reviewed Review

Challenges and issues of STEM education

Main Article Content

Anjum Qureshi corresponding author
Nazir Qureshi


Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, abbreviated as STEM, is a promising field with increasing popularity due to its benefits in the modern world of globalization and modernization. Science and mathematics are the basics of the technological developments going on in the world. Thus, the children should be motivated to learn STEM from early school days. The minds of small kids are like a sponge, and they can grasp everything quickly. STEM education should be encouraged from childhood so that children like it and continue with it for higher education. This chapter discusses some of the challenges observed while encouraging children to learn STEM early and lists solutions.

STEM education, play based learning, gender gap

Article Details

Supporting Agencies
The authors would like to acknowledge the Gram Panchayat (Elected Village Body) of Pellora Village in Chandrapur Distrct of Maharashtra, India for their support in completing this chapter.
How to Cite
Qureshi, A., & Qureshi, N. (2021). Challenges and issues of STEM education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 146-161.


  1. Ampartzaki, M., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Deepening Our Knowledge about Sustainability Education in the Early Years: Lessons from a Water Project. Education Sciences, 11(6), 251.
  2. Bubikova-Moan, J., Næss Hjetland, H., & Wollscheid, S. (2019). ECE Teachers’ views on play-based learning: a systematic review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(6), 776-800.
  3. Chatzopoulos, A., Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., Papoutsidakis, M., Elza, D., & Psycharis, S. (2021). DuBot: An Open-Source, Low-Cost Robot for STEM and Educational Robotics. In Handbook of Research on Using Educational Robotics to Facilitate Student Learning (pp. 441-465). IGI Global.
  4. Dorouka, P., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Nanotechnology and mobile learning: perspectives and opportunities in young children’s education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3), 237-252.
  5. Douma, K. B., & Adler, K. (2020). Leading Change: Microplanning to Customize Student Learning. New Jersey English Journal, 9(1), 5.
  6. Ejiwale, J. A. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 63-74.
  7. Halpern, D., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., Star, J., & Wentzel, K. (2007). Encouraging Girls in Math and Science (NCER 2007-2003). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
  8. Harris Interactive. (2016). STEM perceptions: Student & parent study: Parents and students weigh in on how to inspire the next generation of doctors, scientists, software developers, and engineers.
  9. Harris, R. S., & Hodges, C. B. (2018). STEM Education in Rural Schools: Implications of Untapped Potential. National Youth-At-Risk Journal, 3(1), 3-12.
  10. Lego Foundation. (2017). What we Mean by Learning Through Play, Version 1.2.
  11. McClure, E. R., Guernsey, L., Clements, D. H., Bales, S. N., Nichols, J., Kendall-Taylor, N., & Levine, M. H. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
  12. Padmi, M. R. S., & Salmah, M. U. STEM Village: Promoting and Spreading Awareness about STEM to Families and the Society. Reform and Development in Teacher Education for the Digital Society.
  13. Papadakis, S. (2020). Evaluating a Teaching Intervention for Teaching STEM and Programming Concepts Through the Creation of a Weather-Forecast App for Smart Mobile Devices. In Handbook of Research on Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking in P-12 Education (pp. 31-53). IGI Global.
  14. Papadakis, S. (2021). Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research (AMLER): Mobile learning as an educational reform. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 1-4.
  15. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2017). Evaluation of Greek android mobile applications for preschoolers. Preschool and Primary Education, 5(2), 65-100.
  16. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of a game-based learning approach in modifying students’ behavioural outcomes and competence, in an introductory programming course. A case study in Greece. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 10(3), 235-250.
  17. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). Exploring Preservice Teachers’ Attitudes About the Usage of Educational Robotics in Preschool Education. In the Handbook of Research on Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking in P-12 Education (pp. 339-355). IGI Global.
  18. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). Learning computational thinking development in young children with Bee-Bot educational robotics. In Handbook of research on tools for teaching computational thinking in P-12 education (pp. 289-309). IGI Global.
  19. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (Eds.). (2019). Mobile learning applications in early childhood education. IGI Global.
  20. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 5-18.
  21. Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Attitudes towards the Use of Educational Robotics: Exploring Pre-Service and In-Service Early Childhood Teacher Profiles. Education Sciences, 11(5), 204.
  22. Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vassilakis, K. (2021). Factors That Hinder in-Service Teachers from Incorporating Educational Robotics into Their Daily or Future Teaching Practice. In CSEDU (2) (pp. 55-63).
  23. Poultsakis, S., Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Psycharis, S. (2021). The management of Digital Learning Objects of Natural Sciences and Digital Experiment Simulation Tools by teachers. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 58-71.
  24. Pyle, A., Poliszczuk, D., & Danniels, E. (2018). The challenges of promoting literacy integration within a play-based learning kindergarten program: Teacher perspectives and implementation. Journal of research in childhood education, 32(2), 219-233.
  25. Savinskaya, O. B. (2017). Gender equality in preschool STEM programs as a factor determining Russia’s successful technological development. Russian Education & Society, 59(3-4), 206-216.
  26. Susilo, H., & Sudrajat, A. K. (2020, June). STEM Learning and its Barrier in Schools: The Case of Biology Teachers in Malang City. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1563, No. 1, p. 012042). IOP Publishing.
  27. Tay, J., Salazar, A., & Lee, H. (2018). Parental perceptions of STEM enrichment for young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 5-23.
  28. Teaching Tolerance Project. (1997). Starting Small: Teaching tolerance in preschool and the early grades. Alabama: Southern Poverty Law Center.
  29. The Educational Value of Alumni for Public High Schools. (2019). UC San Diego’s Center for Research in Educational Equity, Assessment and Teaching Excellence (CREATE).
  30. The Institution of Engineering & Technology. (2008). Studying STEM: What are the Barriers.
  31. The Lego Foundation in Support of UNICEF. (2018). Learning Through Play, Strengthening Learning Through Early Play in Early Childhood Education Programs.
  32. Torres-Crespo, M. N., Kraatz, E., & Pallansch, L. (2014). From Fearing STEM to Playing with It: The Natural Integration of STEM into the Preschool Classroom. SRATE Journal, 23(2), 8-16.
  33. Tzagkaraki, E., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Exploring the Use of Educational Robotics in primary school and its possible place in the curricula. In Educational Robotics International Conference (pp. 216-229). Springer, Cham.
  34. UNICEF. (2020). Towards an equal future: Reimagining girls’ education through STEM. New York.
  35. United Way Mumbai and CSR Box. (2018). Perspectives on Better Education through CSR, in India, Assessment of needs & opportunities for investment in education. Retrieved from
  36. US Department of Education in Collaboration with American Institutes for Research. (2015). STEM 2026: A Vision for Innovation in STEM Education.
  37. Vaiopoulou, J., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Parents’ Perceptions of Educational Apps Use for Kindergarten Children: Development and Validation of a New Instrument (PEAU-p) and Exploration of Parents’ Profiles. Behavioral Sciences, 11(6), 82.
  38. Van Voorhis, F. L., Maier, M. F., Epstein, J. L., & Lloyd, C. M. (2013). The impact of family involvement on the education of children ages 3 to 8: A focus on literacy and math achievement outcomes and social-emotional skills. MDRC.
  39. Vidakis, N., Barianos, A. K., Trampas, A. M., Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vassilakis, K. (2019). in-Game Raw Data Collection and Visualization in the Context of the ”ThimelEdu” Educational Game. In the International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 629-646). Springer, Cham.