Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Mobile Learning Media and Physics Education: Exploring Student Preferences, Competence, and Motivation in the Digital Era

Article Sidebar

The Relationship Between Learning Media Preferences and Students' Physics Competencies
Download PDF
Submitted   Mar 22, 2025
Published   Jun 18, 2025
Issue    Vol 5 No 2 (2025)
DOI   10.25082/AMLER.2025.02.002

Views

181

Downloads

51

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Muhammad Aizri Fadillah corresponding author
Department of Science Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Atifah Hirahmah
Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Nisa Cantika Fitri
Department of Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia

Abstract

In this digital era, mobile technology has transformed the education system and made mobile learning media increasingly important, especially in physics education as a complex discipline. Mobile-based learning media, such as physics simulation applications accessed via mobile phones, interactive learning videos via tablets, and mobile learning platforms, have been shown to help students understand abstract and complex physics concepts. However, there is still a gap in the literature regarding how students' preferences for mobile-based learning media affect their physics learning competence and motivation in the context of physics education. This study aims to investigate the relationship between students' preferences for mobile-based learning media, physics competence, and learning motivation in physics learning. This study used a quantitative design with a survey method to collect data from 54 high school students in West Sumatra Province regarding their preferences for various types of mobile-based learning media in physics learning. Data were analyzed using multiple regression to determine the relationship between the variables studied. The results showed that students' preferences for mobile-based learning media had a significant positive impact on physics learning competence and motivation. The findings of the study also showed that students' preferences for PhET simulations accessible via smartphones, mobile-based educational social media applications, and physics learning videos had a significant influence on various aspects of students' physics competence and learning motivation. However, the impact varies depending on the type of learning media preferred and the pattern of students' mobile device usage in physics learning. This study provides valuable insights for physics education practitioners to improve students' learning experiences by considering students' preferences for mobile-based learning media. The implications of this study suggest that understanding and accommodating students' preferences for mobile-based learning media can significantly improve physics competence and learning motivation, thereby improving students' overall learning outcomes.

Keywords
mobile learning media, learning strategy, student preference, physics competence, learning motivation

Article Details

How to Cite
Fadillah, M. A., Hirahmah, A., & Fitri, N. C. (2025). Mobile Learning Media and Physics Education: Exploring Student Preferences, Competence, and Motivation in the Digital Era. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 5(2), 1437-1448. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2025.02.002
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ali, M., Yaacob, R. A. I. B. R., Al-Amin Bin Endut, M. N., & Langove, N. U. (2017). Strengthening the academic usage of social media: An exploratory study. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 29(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.10.002
  2. Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2172929
  3. Alsawaier, R. S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-02-2017-0009
  4. Alt, D., & Itzkovich, Y. (2018). The connection between perceived constructivist learning environments and faculty uncivil authoritarian behaviors. Higher Education, 77(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0281-y
  5. Ansari, J. A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00118-7
  6. Baber, H. (2021). Social interaction and effectiveness of the online learning – A moderating role of maintaining social distance during the pandemic COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-09-2020-0209
  7. Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.023108
  8. Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2022). The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3
  9. Calalb, M. (2023). The Constructivist Principle of Learning by Being in Physics Teaching. Athens Journal of Education, 10(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-1-8
  10. Ceberio, M., Almudí, J. M., & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9615-7
  11. Chuang, S. (2021). The Applications of Constructivist Learning Theory and Social Learning Theory on Adult Continuous Development. Performance Improvement, 60(3), 6–14. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21963
  12. D’Aquila, J. M., Wang, D., & Mattia, A. (2019). Are instructor generated YouTube videos effective in accounting classes? A study of student performance, engagement, motivation, and perception. Journal of Accounting Education, 47, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2019.02.002
  13. Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
  14. De Leng, B., Dolmans, D., van de Wiel, M., Muijtjens, A., & van der Vleuten, C. (2007). How video cases should be used as authentic stimuli in problem-based medical education. Medical Education, 41(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02671.x
  15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
  16. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
  17. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2018-0665
  18. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1
  19. Hobbins, J. O., Murrant, C. L., Snook, L. A., Tishinsky, J. M., & Ritchie, K. L. (2020). Incorporating higher order thinking and deep learning in a large, lecture-based human physiology course: can we do it? Advances in Physiology Education, 44(4), 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00126.2019
  20. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2020). The Use of Developmentally Mobile Applications for Preparing Pre-Service Teachers to Promote STEM Activities in Preschool Classrooms. Mobile Learning Applications in Early Childhood Education, 82–100. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1486-3.ch005
  21. Liao, C.-H., & Wu, J.-Y. (2023). Learning analytics on video-viewing engagement in a flipped statistics course: Relating external video-viewing patterns to internal motivational dynamics and performance. Computers & Education, 197, 104754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104754
  22. Liu, D., & Zhang, H. (2022). Improving Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills and Achievement Using WeChat based Flipped Classroom in Higher Education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7281–7302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10922-y
  23. Molinillo, S., Anaya-Sánchez, R., Aguilar-Illescas, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Social media-based collaborative learning: Exploring antecedents of attitude. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.003
  24. Oguguo, B. C., Ajuonuma, J. O., Azubuike, R., Ene, C. U., Atta, F. O., & Oko, C. J. (2020). Influence of social media on students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 1000. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20638
  25. Papadakis, S. (2020). Apps to Promote Computational Thinking Concepts and Coding Skills in Children of Preschool and Pre-Primary School Age. Mobile Learning Applications in Early Childhood Education, 101–121. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1486-3.ch006
  26. Papadakis, S. (2023). MOOCs 2012-2022: An overview. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 682–693. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.01.017
  27. Papadakis, S., Trampas, A., Barianos, A., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vidakis, N. (2020). Evaluating the Learning Process: The “ThimelEdu” Educational Game Case Study. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009379902900298
  28. Papadakis, S. (2020). Evaluating a game-development approach to teach introductory programming concepts in secondary education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtel.2020.106282
  29. Perkins, K. (2020). Transforming STEM Learning at Scale: PhET Interactive Simulations. Childhood Education, 96(4), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2020.1796451
  30. Peterson, R. A. (2000). Marketing Letters, 11(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008191211004
  31. Prabowo, A., Anggoro, R. P., Adiyanto, R., & Rahmawati, U. (2018). Interactive Multimedia-based Teaching Material for Trigonometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012138. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012138
  32. Purnama, H. I., Wilujeng, I., & Abdul Jabar, C. S. (2023). Web-based E-learning in Elementary School: A Systematic Literature Review. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 7(3), 749. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.3.1203
  33. Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
  34. Rahayu, A. P., Saepulloh, S., & Ginanjar, E. (2023). Analysis of The Impact of Using Audio-Visual Media on Student Learning Motivation. JURNAL PENA EDUKASI, 10(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.54314/jpe.v10i2.1389
  35. Reeves, T. C. (1998). The impact of media and technology in schools. Journal of The Journal of Art and Design Education, 2, 58–63.
  36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  37. Sanulita, H., Hendriyanto, D., Citrawati Lestari, N., Ramli, A., & Arifudin, O. (2024). Analysis Of The Effectiveness Of Audio Visual Learning Media Based On Macromedia Flash Usage On School Program Of Increasing Student Learning Motivation. Journal on Education, 6(2), 12641–12650. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.5121
  38. Sari, S. Y., Hirahmah, A., Hidayati, H., & Rahim, F. R. (2023). Validity of Interactive Learning Media Integrated Critical and Creative Thinking Skills Aided by the Lectora Inspire Application. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v7i2.7404
  39. Sarwinda, K., Rohaeti, E., & Fatharani, M. (2020). The development of audio-visual media with contextual teaching learning approach to improve learning motivation and critical thinking skills. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 2(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v2i2.12
  40. Sastradika, D., Iskandar, I., Syefrinando, B., & Shulman, F. (2021). Development of animation-based learning media to increase student’s motivation in learning physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1), 012180. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012180
  41. Schunk, D. H. (2022). Self-Regulation of Self-Efficacy and Attributions in Academic Settings. Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203763353-4
  42. Silva, L., Mendes, A., Gomes, A., & Fortes, G. (2023). Fostering regulatory processes using computational scaffolding. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09388-y
  43. Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2020). Video-worked examples to support the development of elementary students’ science process skills: a case study in an inquiry activity on electrical circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1786361
  44. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
  45. Trautner, M., & Schwinger, M. (2020). Integrating the concepts self-efficacy and motivation regulation: How do self-efficacy beliefs for motivation regulation influence self-regulatory success? Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101890
  46. Usmeldi, U., Amini, R., & Trisna, S. (2017). The Development of Research-Based Learning Model with Science, Environment, Technology, and Society Approaches to Improve Critical Thinking of Students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 318. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.10680
  47. Widiantari, I. A. P. A., & Dewi, N. L. P. E. S. (2023). YouTube as an Alternative Learning Media for Independent Bilingual Young Learners: A Review. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 9(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v9i1.4611
  48. Wu, J., Guo, R., Wang, Z., & Zeng, R. (2019). Integrating spherical video-based virtual reality into elementary school students’ scientific inquiry instruction: effects on their problem-solving performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1587469
  49. Yang, D., & Baldwin, S. J. (2020). Using Technology to Support Student Learning in an Integrated STEM Learning Environment. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i1.22
  50. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004
  51. Zheng, Y., Li, L., & Zheng, F. (2010). Social Media Support for Knowledge Management. 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/icmss.2010.5576725
  52. Zuo, M., Kong, S., Ma, Y., Hu, Y., & Xiao, M. (2023). The Effects of Using Scaffolding in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070705