Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Implementation and evaluation of a remote seminar on the pedagogical use of educational robotics

Main Article Content

Tzimopoulos Nikos corresponding author
Provelengios Petros
Iosifidou Maria


This article describes distance teacher training for educational robotics' pedagogical use, e.g., the planning, the implementation, and the evaluation by the teachers involved. The training seminars were organized as part of the Greek eTwinning community's seminars. They were based on a Teacher Practice Community of the South Aegean about using ICT in teaching practice. From 2018 we have included seminars on educational robotics. There is a growing interest in the use of educational robotics in teaching practice. Although the topic is such that face-to-face contact and experimentation with the subject is considered necessary, we tried to educate teachers using remote learning methodology. The project was successful, and the evaluation of the seminars was very positive.

educational robotics, teacher training, eTwinning, communities of practice

Article Details

How to Cite
Nikos, T., Petros, P., & Maria, I. (2021). Implementation and evaluation of a remote seminar on the pedagogical use of educational robotics. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 48-57.


  1. Anastasiades, P. (2008). Blending interactive videoconferencing and asynchronous learning in adult education: towards a constructivism pedagogical approach - a case study at the University of Crete (E.DIA.M.ME.). In N. Solomon, M.E. Whitman, A.B.Woszczynski, K. Hoganson & H. Mattord (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Learning for Real-time and Asynchronous Information Technology Education (pp. 24-64). New York: Hershey, Information Science Reference.
  2. Chlapanis, G. & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2004). Teacher training online: presentation of the case of the teaching community of teachers of the University of the Aegean. Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic Conference with international participation ICT in Education. Athens: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
  3. Cochrane, T. D. (2014). Critical Success Factors for Transforming Pedagogy with Mobile Web 2.0. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 65-82.
  4. Crawley C., Gerhard P., Gilleran A, Joyce A. (2010). eTwinning 2.0 Building the community for schools in Europe, European Commission.
  5. Desai, P. (2015). Python Programming for Arduino, Packt Publishing.
  6. European Commission. (2003). Efficient investment in education and training: an urgent need for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
  7. Gilleran, A. and Kearney, C. (2014). Developing Pupil Competences Through eTwinning. Central Support Service for eTwinning (CSS). European Schoolnet, Rue de Tr`eves 61, B-1040 Brussels Belgium.
  8. Gomez, F. S., & Ord´o˜nez, A. (2016). Application of a reference framework for integration of web resources in DOTLRN-Case study of Physics-topic: Waves. In M. McPherson and M. B. Nunes (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference e-learning 2016, Part I, 112-119.
  9. Grosjean, M. (2015). Mainstreaming ICT-enabled Innovation in Education and Training in Europe: Policy Actions for Sustainability, Scalability, and Impact at System Level.
  10. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Using a discourse-intensive pedagogy and android app inventor for introducing computational concepts to middle school students. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 723-728).
  11. Guzdial, M. (2004). Programming environments for novices. Computer science education research, 2004, 127-154.
  12. Kafai, Y. B. (2016). From computational thinking to computational participation in K-12 education. Communications of the ACM, 59(8), 26-27.
  13. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  14. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2007). The dual form of further education of educators in ICT: technical and pedagogical training. In C. Constantinou, Z. Zacharias & M. Papaevripidou (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference On Computer-Based Learning in Science, Heraklion, 30, 265-276.
  15. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017a). A proposal for teaching ScratchJr programming environment in preservice kindergarten teachers. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) (pp. 21-25).
  16. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017b). Preservice kindergarten teachers accept “ScratchJr” as a tool for learning and teaching computational thinking and Science education. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Research, practice and collaboration in science education (pp. 31-37).
  17. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2019). Evaluating preservice kindergarten teachers’ intention to adopt and use tablets into teaching practice for natural sciences. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 13(1), 113-127.
  18. Kalogiannakis, M. Tzagkaraki, E., & Papadakis, S. (2021). A Systematic Review of the Use of BBC Micro:bit in Primary School. In Proceedings of the 10th Virtual Edition of the International Conference New Perspectives in Science Education, 379-384, Italy-Florence: Filodiritto - Pixel, 18-19.
  19. Kampylis, P., Punie Y. (2013). ICT-enabled innovation for learning in Europe and Asia. Exploring conditions for sustainability, scalability, and impact at the system level.
  20. Kelleher, J. D., & Costello, F. (2009). Applying computational models of spatial prepositions to visually situated dialogue. Computational Linguistics, 35(2), 271-306.
  21. Kokkos, A. (2004). Adult educators and their education. Adult Education, 1, 12-23.
  22. Kontogiannopoulou - Polydoridi, G. (1995). Educational Policy and Practice: Sociological Analysis. Athens: Greek Letters.
  23. Papadakis, S. (2016). Creativity and innovation in European education. Ten years eTwinning. Past, present and the future. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(3-4), 279-296.
  24. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Orfanakis, V., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Using Scratch and App Inventor for teaching introductory programming in Secondary Education. A case study. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1.
  25. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Orfanakis, V., & Zaranis, N. (2017). The Appropriateness of Scratch and App Inventor as Educational Environments for Teaching Introductory Programming in Primary and Secondary Education. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 12(4), 58-77.
  26. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021a). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 5-18.
  27. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Sifaki, E., & Vidakis, N. (2017). Access moodle using smart mobile phones. A case study in a Greek University. In Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation (pp. 376-385). Springer, Cham.
  28. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Sifaki, E., & Vidakis, N. (2018). Evaluating Moodle use via Smart Mobile Phones. A case study in a Greek University. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Creative Technologies, 18(16), e1.
  29. Papadakis, St., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2010). eTwinning in the early childhood as starting line of innovative practices for the didactic of natural sciences. In M. Kalogiannakis, D. Stavrou & P.G. Michaelidis (Eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hands-on Science, Bridging the Science and Society Gap. Rethymno, 25-31 July, 2010, 235-240.
  30. Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vassilakis, K. (2021b). Factors That Hinder In-Service Teachers from Incorporating Educational Robotics into Their Daily or Future Teaching Practice. In B. Csap´o and J. Uhomoibhi (Eds). Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2021), 2, 55-63.
  31. Patterson, S. (2016) Programming in the primary grades: beyond the hour of code. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefeld.
  32. Petousi, V., & Sifaki, E. (2020). Contextualizing harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from discourse analysis of scientific publications, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23(3-4), 149-174.
  33. Pham, M.C., Klamma, R., & Derntl, M. (2012). Dynamic Visual Analytics for Lifelong Learning Communities.
  34. Raptis, A., & Rapti, A. (2000). Educational Policy and Introduction of New Technologies in Education. In V. Komis (ed.), Information and Communication Technologies in Education, 15-28. Athens: New Technologies Publications.
  35. Resnick, M. (1993). Learning About Life. Artificial Life Journal, 1(1 2), 229-241.$_$2.229
  36. Shokri, A., & Dafoulas, G. (2016). A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Social Networks in Educational Contexts. In: M. McPherson and M. B. Nunes (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference e-learning 2016, Part I, pp. 43-52.
  37. Ssekakubo, G., Suleman, H., & Marsden, G. (2013). Designing Mobile LMS Interfaces: Learners’ Expectations and Experiences. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 10(2), 147-167.
  38. Tzimopoulos N., & Porpoda A. (2009). Training of computer science teachers PE19,20 The implementation of the program from a distance in the prefecture of Cyclades, Proceedings of the 5th Panhellenic Conference “Utilization of ICT in Teaching Practice” p. 1032, Syros.
  39. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University.