Open Access Peer-reviewed Review

Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Risks, and Pedagogical Implications for Learning and Assessment

Article Sidebar

Impacts of AI in Education
Download PDF
Submitted   Jan 24, 2026
Published   May 18, 2026
Issue    Vol 6 No 2 (2026)
DOI   10.25082/AMLER.2026.02.001

Views

0

Downloads

0

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Krishna Kumari Upadhayaya corresponding author
Department of English Language Education, School of Education, Kathmandu University, Hattiban, Lalitpur, Nepal

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is changing teaching, learning, evaluation, and feedback methods in educational settings. An increasing body of research indicates that while AI-supported technologies improve efficiency, customisation, and access to learning resources, they may also reduce evidence of meaningful learning while simultaneously improving observable academic performance. Using interrelated pedagogical, cognitive, ethical, assessment, and policy viewpoints, this study critically investigates AI in education. The study provides an integrative understanding of AI integration in education by synthesizing literature from empirical investigations (n = 21), conceptual papers (n = 19), policy reports (n = 5), and one review study using a critical narrative review design. The results show that although AI improves feedback, student engagement, instructional support, and chances for adaptive learning, it also creates issues with cognitive dependence, academic integrity, algorithmic bias, data privacy, inequality, and assessment validity. The review's main conclusion is that there is a growing conflict between meaningful learning and visible academic achievement since AI-mediated outputs might not always demonstrate prolonged cognitive engagement or conceptual grasp. The study contends that pedagogical design, teacher involvement, AI literacy, institutional governance, and technological competence all play a role in the educational usefulness of AI. The paper emphasizes the necessity of learning and assessment systems that support responsible, egalitarian, and learner-centered AI integration in educational settings while preserving learner agency and making thinking visible.

Keywords
artificial intelligence, generative AI, learning outcomes, AI literacy

Article Details

How to Cite
Upadhayaya, K. K. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities, Risks, and Pedagogical Implications for Learning and Assessment. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 6(2), 1833-1844. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2026.02.001
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Act, E. A. I. (2024). The EU Artificial Intelligence Act. European Union. https://www.wsgr.com
  2. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
  3. Alfiras, M. I. I., Emran, A. Q., & Mohamed, A. M. (2025). Ethics and governance of generative AI in education: a systematic review on responsible adoption. Discover Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01051-y
  4. Aravantinos, S., Lavidas, K., Komis, V., Karalis, T., & Papadakis, S. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education: A Systematic Review of Teachers’ Professional Development Needs for AI Integration. Computers, 15(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15010049
  5. Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic Bias in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(4), 1052–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9
  6. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
  7. Bearman, M., Tai, J., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Ajjawi, R. (2024). Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment &Amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321
  8. Biesta, G. J. J. (2015). Beautiful Risk of Education (, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315635866
  9. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309
  10. Bulger, M. (2016). Personalized Learning: The Conversations We’re Not Having (, Ed.). Data & Society Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.69985/obue9001
  11. Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment (, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740621
  12. Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2019). Instructional Visualizations, Cognitive Load Theory, and Visuospatial Processing. Visuospatial Processing for Education in Health and Natural Sciences, 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_5
  13. Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/mrz8h
  14. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  15. Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1
  16. Ellis, R., Han, F., & Cook, H. (2025). Qualitatively different teacher experiences of teaching with generative artificial intelligence. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00532-2
  17. European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/actions/plan
  18. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People--An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and machines, 28(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
  19. Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., Järvelä, S., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2024). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour &Amp; Information Technology, 44(11), 2518–2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2024.2394886
  20. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information &Amp; Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  21. Hariyanto, Kristianingsih, F. X. D., & Maharani, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in adaptive education: a systematic review of techniques for personalized learning. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00908-6
  22. Holmes, W. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education. Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_107
  23. Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., ... & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
  24. Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
  25. Illeris, K. (Ed.). (2009). Contemporary Theories of Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870426
  26. Jauhiainen, J. S., & Garagorry Guerra, A. (2024). Generative AI and education: dynamic personalization of pupils’ school learning material with ChatGPT. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723
  27. Karakose, T., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., & Yirci, R. (2023). Evaluating the Intellectual Structure of the Knowledge Base on Transformational School Leadership: A Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070708
  28. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  29. Kizilcec, R. F., & Lee, H. (2022). Algorithmic fairness in education. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 174–202. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429329067-10
  30. Lampropoulos, G., & Papadakis, S. (2025). The Educational Value of Artificial Intelligence and Social Robots. Social Robots in Education, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82915-4_1
  31. Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.
  32. Lavidas, K., Papadakis, S., Manesis, D., Grigoriadou, A. S., & Gialamas, V. (2022). The Effects of Social Desirability on Students’ Self-Reports in Two Social Contexts: Lectures vs. Lectures and Lab Classes. Information, 13(10), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13100491
  33. Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
  34. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
  35. Luckin, R. (2018). Machine Learning and Human Intelligence. The future of education for the 21st century. UCL institute of education press.
  36. Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education.
  37. Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2021). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003
  38. National Research Council, Board on Behavioral, Sensory Sciences, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with additional material from the Committee on Learning Research, & Educational Practice. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition (Vol. 1). National Academies Press.
  39. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
  40. OECD. (2026). Digital Education Outlook 2026: AI and the future of learning. https://www.oecd.org/education/digital-education-outlook
  41. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
  42. Regan, P. M., & Jesse, J. (2018). Ethical challenges of edtech, big data and personalized learning: twenty-first century student sorting and tracking. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9492-2
  43. Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2024). Generative AI and agency in education: A critical scoping review and thematic analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00631.
  44. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
  45. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of applied learning & teaching, 6(1), 342-363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
  46. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers?: AI and the Future of Education (Vol. 97). John Wiley & Sons.
  47. Slimi, Z. (2026). A systematic critical review of generative AI’s impact on authorship, pedagogy, and integrity (2023–2025). Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1769680
  48. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  49. Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
  50. Susnjak, T., & McIntosh, T. (2024). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? Education Sciences, 14(6), 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060656
  51. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org
  52. Uğraş, H., Uğraş, M., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2024). ChatGPT-Supported Education in Primary Schools: The Potential of ChatGPT for Sustainable Practices. Sustainability, 16(22), 9855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229855
  53. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.
  54. Wentzel, K. R. (2010). Students' relationships with teachers. In Handbook of research on schools, schooling and human development (pp. 75-91). Routledge.
  55. Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
  56. World Bank. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and challenges. https://www.worldbank.org
  57. Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., Tülübaş, T., & Papadakis, S. (2023). A Bibliometric Review of the Knowledge Base on Mentoring for the Professional Development of School Administrators. Sustainability, 15(4), 3027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043027
  58. Zacharis, G., & Papadakis, S. (2025). Can AI Grade Like a Human? Validity, Reliability, and Fairness in University Coursework Assessment. Educational Process International Journal, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.19.591
  59. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0