Open Access Peer-reviewed Case Study

Using an augmented reality application for teaching plant parts: A case study in 1ˢᵗ-grade primary school students

Article Sidebar

AR app
Download PDF
Submitted   Dec 3, 2022
Published   Feb 1, 2023
Issue    Vol 3 No 1 (2023)
DOI   10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.012

Views

923

Downloads

541

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Georgia Antoniadi corresponding author
Department of Preschool Education, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece

Abstract

The rapid development of augmented reality (AR) applications has led to wide adoption in education, acting as a supporting tool to increase the transmitted information. However, children need to improve their knowledge of plants, their categories, their conceptual framework as well as the human relationship with them. This research studies the learning outcomes of a plant-themed augmented reality mobile application and its key features designed for 1st graders of primary school. The results of the research showed that there was no statistically significant improvement between the experimental group and the control group.

Keywords
Augmented Reality, environmental study, mobile education, primary education

Article Details

How to Cite
Antoniadi, G. (2023). Using an augmented reality application for teaching plant parts: A case study in 1ˢᵗ-grade primary school students. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 630-637. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.012
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ampartzaki, M., Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Giannakou, V. (2022). Perceptions About STEM and the Arts: Teachers', Parents' Professionals' and Artists' Understandings About the Role of Arts in STEM Education. In STEM, Robotics, Mobile Apps in Early Childhood and Primary Education (pp. 601-624). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0568-1_25
  2. Anderson, J., Ellis, JP, & Jones, AM (2014). Understanding early elementary children's conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawing. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0230
  3. Antonioli, M., Blake, C., & Sparks, K. (2014). Augmented Reality Applications in Education. The Journal of Technology Studies, 40(1/2), 96-10. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v40i2.a.4
  4. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: teleoperators & virtual environments, 6(4), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
  5. Bacca Acosta, J. L., Baldiris Navarro, S. M., Fabregat Gesa, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and application. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 133-149.
  6. Balding, M., & Williams, K. J. (2016). Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1192-1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12738
  7. Barianos, A. K., Papadakis, A., & Vidakis, N. (2022). Content manager for serious games: Theoretical framework and digital platform. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.009
  8. Beltozar-Clemente, S., Sierra-Liñan, F., Zapata-Paulini, J., & Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. (2022). Augmented reality mobile application to improve the astronomy teaching-learning process. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 464-474. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.02.015
  9. Berryman, D. (2012). Augmented Reality: a review. Medical reference services quarterly, 31(2), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.670604
  10. Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented Reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111
  11. Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education-cases, places and potential. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400
  12. Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of computer assisted learning, 29(6), 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12008
  13. Campos-Pajuelo, E., Vargas-Hernandez, L., Sierra-Liñan, F., Zapata-Paulini, J., & Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. (2022). Learning the chemical elements through an augmented reality application for elementary school children. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 493-501. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.02.018
  14. Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia tools and applications, 51(1), 341-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0660-6
  15. Caudell, T. P., & Mizell, D. W. (1992). Augmented Reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In JF Nunamaker & RH Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 659- 669. Kauai, Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317
  16. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented Reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of science education and technology, 22(4), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
  17. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Children and parents' reading of an augmented reality picture book: Analyses of behavioral patterns and cognitive attainment. Computers & Education, 72, 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.003
  18. Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
  19. Dahal, N., Manandhar, N. K., Luitel, L., Luitel, B. C., Pant, B. P., & Shrestha, I. M. (2022). ICT tools for remote teaching and learning mathematics: A proposal for autonomy and engagements. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2 (1), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.013
  20. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, MB, & Kloos, CD (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
  21. Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268608559933
  22. Drolia, M., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Mobile learning applications for refugees: a systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 12(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020096
  23. Drolia, M., Sifaki, E., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). An overview of mobile learning for refugee students: juxtaposing refugee needs with mobile applications' characteristics. Challenges, 11(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe11020031
  24. Fokides, E., Atsikpasi, P., & Karageorgou, D. (2020). Tablets, plants, and primary school students: A study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 621-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09445-7
  25. Gatt, S., Tunnicliffe, SD, Borg, K., & Lautier, K. (2007). Young Maltese children's ideas about plants. Journal of Biological Education, 41(3), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656080
  26. Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students' learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895-1906. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1057747
  27. Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented Reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004
  28. Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. New Media Consortium. 6101 West Courtyard Drive Building One Suite 100, Austin, TX 78730.
  29. Jose, S. B., Wu, C. H., & Kamoun, S. (2019). Overcoming plant blindness in science, education, and society. Plants, People, Planet, 1(3), 169-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.51
  30. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017). A proposal for teaching ScratchJr programming environment in preservice kindergarten teachers. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) (pp. 21-25).
  31. Karakose, T., Papadakis, S., Tülübaş, T., & Polat, H. (2022). Understanding the Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Distributed Leadership in Schools: A Science Mapping-Based Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 14(24), 16779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416779
  32. Karakose, T., Polat, H., Yirci, R., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., Ozdemir, T. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2023). Assessment of the Relationships between Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Classroom Management Anxiety, Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Academic Amotivation and Attitudes toward the Teaching Profession Using Structural Equation Modelling. Mathematics, 11(2), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020449
  33. Kardong-Edgren, S., Farra, S. L., Alinier, G., & Young, H. M. (2019). A call to unify definitions of virtual reality. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 31(C), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.02.006
  34. Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives-the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulation. Educational technology research and development, 56(2), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6
  35. Laine, T. (2018). Mobile educational augmented reality games: A systematic literature review and two case studies. Computers, 7(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers7010019
  36. Lazarinis, F., Karatrantou, A., Panagiotakopoulos, C., Daloukas, V., & Panagiotakopoulos, T. (2022). Strengthening the coding skills of teachers in a low dropout Python MOOC. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.003
  37. Lee, K. (2012). Augmented Reality in education and training. TechTrends, 56(2), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0559-3
  38. Mercan, Z., Papadakis, S., Can Gözüm, A. İ., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Examination of STEM Parent Awareness in the Transition from Preschool to Primary School. Sustainability, 14(21), 14030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114030
  39. Papadakis, S. (2021). The impact of coding apps to support young children in computational thinking and computational fluency. A literature review. In Frontiers in Education (p. 183). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.657895
  40. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2017). Evaluation of Greek Android mobile applications for preschoolers. Preschool and Primary Education, 5(2), 65-100. https://doi.org/10.12681/ppej.11208
  41. Papadakis, S., Alexandraki, F., & Zaranis, N. (2022). Mobile device use among preschool-aged children in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2717-2750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10718-6
  42. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Gözüm, A. I. C. (2022). STEM, STEAM, computational thinking, and coding: Evidence-based research and practice in children's development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1110476
  43. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Sifaki, E., & Vidakis, N. (2018). Access Moodle Using Smart Mobile Phone . A Case Study in a Greek Universit . In A. Brooks, E. Brooks, N. Vidakis (Eds.), Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT 2017, DLI 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 229, (pp. 376-385), Switzerland, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76908-0_36
  44. Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vassilakis, K. (2021). Factors That Hinder in-Service Teachers from Incorporating Educational Robotics into Their Daily or Future Teaching Practice. In CSEDU (2) (pp. 55-63). https://doi.org/10.5220/0010413900550063
  45. Pedaste, M., Mitt, G., & Jürivete, T. (2020). What is the effect of using mobile augmented Reality in K12 inquiry-based learning? Education Sciences, 10(4), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040094
  46. Petousi, V., & Sifaki, E. (2020). Contextualizing harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from a discourse analysis of scientific publications, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23(3/4), 149-174, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2020.115206
  47. Radu, I. (2014). Augmented Reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533-1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
  48. Revelle, G., Reardon, E., Cook, K., Takeuchi, L., Ballagas, R., Mori, K., Horii, H., Raffle, H., Sandberg, & Spasojevic, M. (2015). Electric agents: Combining collaborative mobile augmented Reality and web-based video to reinvent interactive television. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 12(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702109.2633413
  49. Tsoukala, C. K. (2021). STEM integrated education and multimodal educational material. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.02.005
  50. Vaiopoulou, J., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Parents' perceptions of educational apps use for kindergarten children: development and validation of a new instrument (PEAU-p) and exploration of parents' profiles. Behavioral Sciences, 11(6), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11060082
  51. Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naive physics. Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice, pp. 61-76. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_3
  52. Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented Reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
  53. Yangin, S., Sidekli, S., & Gokbulut, Y. (2014). Prospective teachers' misconceptions about classification of plants and changes in their misconceptions during pre-service education. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.105
  54. Yazıcı Arıcı, E., Keskin, H. K., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Evaluation of Children's Discourses Regarding Imaginary Companion: The Case of Türkiye. Sustainability, 14(24), 16608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416608
  55. Yuen, SCY, Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented Reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0401.10