Open Access Peer-reviewed Case Study

Using an augmented reality application for teaching plant parts: A case study in 1ˢᵗ-grade primary school students

Main Article Content

Georgia Antoniadi corresponding author


The rapid development of augmented reality (AR) applications has led to wide adoption in education, acting as a supporting tool to increase the transmitted information. However, children need to improve their knowledge of plants, their categories, their conceptual framework as well as the human relationship with them. This research studies the learning outcomes of a plant-themed augmented reality mobile application and its key features designed for 1st graders of primary school. The results of the research showed that there was no statistically significant improvement between the experimental group and the control group.

Augmented Reality, environmental study, mobile education, primary education

Article Details

How to Cite
Antoniadi, G. (2023). Using an augmented reality application for teaching plant parts: A case study in 1ˢᵗ-grade primary school students. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 630-637.


  1. Ampartzaki, M., Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Giannakou, V. (2022). Perceptions About STEM and the Arts: Teachers', Parents' Professionals' and Artists' Understandings About the Role of Arts in STEM Education. In STEM, Robotics, Mobile Apps in Early Childhood and Primary Education (pp. 601-624). Springer, Singapore.
  2. Anderson, J., Ellis, JP, & Jones, AM (2014). Understanding early elementary children's conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawing. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 375-386.
  3. Antonioli, M., Blake, C., & Sparks, K. (2014). Augmented Reality Applications in Education. The Journal of Technology Studies, 40(1/2), 96-10.
  4. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: teleoperators & virtual environments, 6(4), 355-385.
  5. Bacca Acosta, J. L., Baldiris Navarro, S. M., Fabregat Gesa, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and application. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 133-149.
  6. Balding, M., & Williams, K. J. (2016). Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1192-1199.
  7. Barianos, A. K., Papadakis, A., & Vidakis, N. (2022). Content manager for serious games: Theoretical framework and digital platform. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 251-262.
  8. Beltozar-Clemente, S., Sierra-Liñan, F., Zapata-Paulini, J., & Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. (2022). Augmented reality mobile application to improve the astronomy teaching-learning process. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 464-474.
  9. Berryman, D. (2012). Augmented Reality: a review. Medical reference services quarterly, 31(2), 212-218.
  10. Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented Reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56-63.
  11. Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented Reality in education-cases, places and potential. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1-15.
  12. Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of computer assisted learning, 29(6), 505-517.
  13. Campos-Pajuelo, E., Vargas-Hernandez, L., Sierra-Liñan, F., Zapata-Paulini, J., & Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. (2022). Learning the chemical elements through an augmented reality application for elementary school children. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 493-501.
  14. Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., & Ivkovic, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia tools and applications, 51(1), 341-377.
  15. Caudell, T. P., & Mizell, D. W. (1992). Augmented Reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In JF Nunamaker & RH Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 659- 669. Kauai, Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society Press.
  16. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented Reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of science education and technology, 22(4), 449-462.
  17. Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Children and parents' reading of an augmented reality picture book: Analyses of behavioral patterns and cognitive attainment. Computers & Education, 72, 302-312.
  18. Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
  19. Dahal, N., Manandhar, N. K., Luitel, L., Luitel, B. C., Pant, B. P., & Shrestha, I. M. (2022). ICT tools for remote teaching and learning mathematics: A proposal for autonomy and engagements. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2 (1), 289-296.
  20. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, MB, & Kloos, CD (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.
  21. Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science.
  22. Drolia, M., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Mobile learning applications for refugees: a systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 12(2), 96.
  23. Drolia, M., Sifaki, E., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). An overview of mobile learning for refugee students: juxtaposing refugee needs with mobile applications' characteristics. Challenges, 11(2), 31.
  24. Fokides, E., Atsikpasi, P., & Karageorgou, D. (2020). Tablets, plants, and primary school students: A study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 621-649.
  25. Gatt, S., Tunnicliffe, SD, Borg, K., & Lautier, K. (2007). Young Maltese children's ideas about plants. Journal of Biological Education, 41(3), 117-122.
  26. Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students' learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895-1906.
  27. Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented Reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
  28. Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. New Media Consortium. 6101 West Courtyard Drive Building One Suite 100, Austin, TX 78730.
  29. Jose, S. B., Wu, C. H., & Kamoun, S. (2019). Overcoming plant blindness in science, education, and society. Plants, People, Planet, 1(3), 169-17.
  30. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017). A proposal for teaching ScratchJr programming environment in preservice kindergarten teachers. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) (pp. 21-25).
  31. Karakose, T., Papadakis, S., Tülübaş, T., & Polat, H. (2022). Understanding the Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Distributed Leadership in Schools: A Science Mapping-Based Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 14(24), 16779.
  32. Karakose, T., Polat, H., Yirci, R., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., Ozdemir, T. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2023). Assessment of the Relationships between Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Classroom Management Anxiety, Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Academic Amotivation and Attitudes toward the Teaching Profession Using Structural Equation Modelling. Mathematics, 11(2), 449.
  33. Kardong-Edgren, S., Farra, S. L., Alinier, G., & Young, H. M. (2019). A call to unify definitions of virtual reality. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 31(C), 28-33.
  34. Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives-the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulation. Educational technology research and development, 56(2), 203-228.
  35. Laine, T. (2018). Mobile educational augmented reality games: A systematic literature review and two case studies. Computers, 7(1), 19.
  36. Lazarinis, F., Karatrantou, A., Panagiotakopoulos, C., Daloukas, V., & Panagiotakopoulos, T. (2022). Strengthening the coding skills of teachers in a low dropout Python MOOC. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 187-200.
  37. Lee, K. (2012). Augmented Reality in education and training. TechTrends, 56(2), 13-21.
  38. Mercan, Z., Papadakis, S., Can Gözüm, A. İ., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Examination of STEM Parent Awareness in the Transition from Preschool to Primary School. Sustainability, 14(21), 14030.
  39. Papadakis, S. (2021). The impact of coding apps to support young children in computational thinking and computational fluency. A literature review. In Frontiers in Education (p. 183). Frontiers.
  40. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2017). Evaluation of Greek Android mobile applications for preschoolers. Preschool and Primary Education, 5(2), 65-100.
  41. Papadakis, S., Alexandraki, F., & Zaranis, N. (2022). Mobile device use among preschool-aged children in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2717-2750.
  42. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Gözüm, A. I. C. (2022). STEM, STEAM, computational thinking, and coding: Evidence-based research and practice in children's development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-4.
  43. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Sifaki, E., & Vidakis, N. (2018). Access Moodle Using Smart Mobile Phone . A Case Study in a Greek Universit . In A. Brooks, E. Brooks, N. Vidakis (Eds.), Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT 2017, DLI 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 229, (pp. 376-385), Switzerland, Cham: Springer.
  44. Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vassilakis, K. (2021). Factors That Hinder in-Service Teachers from Incorporating Educational Robotics into Their Daily or Future Teaching Practice. In CSEDU (2) (pp. 55-63).
  45. Pedaste, M., Mitt, G., & Jürivete, T. (2020). What is the effect of using mobile augmented Reality in K12 inquiry-based learning? Education Sciences, 10(4), 94.
  46. Petousi, V., & Sifaki, E. (2020). Contextualizing harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from a discourse analysis of scientific publications, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23(3/4), 149-174,
  47. Radu, I. (2014). Augmented Reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533-1543.
  48. Revelle, G., Reardon, E., Cook, K., Takeuchi, L., Ballagas, R., Mori, K., Horii, H., Raffle, H., Sandberg, & Spasojevic, M. (2015). Electric agents: Combining collaborative mobile augmented Reality and web-based video to reinvent interactive television. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 12(3), 1-21.
  49. Tsoukala, C. K. (2021). STEM integrated education and multimodal educational material. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 96-113.
  50. Vaiopoulou, J., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Parents' perceptions of educational apps use for kindergarten children: development and validation of a new instrument (PEAU-p) and exploration of parents' profiles. Behavioral Sciences, 11(6), 82.
  51. Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naive physics. Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice, pp. 61-76. Springer, Dordrecht.
  52. Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented Reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.
  53. Yangin, S., Sidekli, S., & Gokbulut, Y. (2014). Prospective teachers' misconceptions about classification of plants and changes in their misconceptions during pre-service education.
  54. Yazıcı Arıcı, E., Keskin, H. K., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Evaluation of Children's Discourses Regarding Imaginary Companion: The Case of Türkiye. Sustainability, 14(24), 16608.
  55. Yuen, SCY, Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented Reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 4(1), 11.