Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Evaluation of Google Play educational apps for early childhood education

Article Sidebar

The four domains
Download PDF
Submitted   May 1, 2023
Published   Jul 14, 2023
Issue    Vol 3 No 2 (2023)
DOI   10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.004

Views

1436

Downloads

684

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Avraam Chatzopoulos corresponding author
Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Alexandros Karaflis
Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Michail Kalogiannakis
Department of Preschool Education, University of Crete, Rethymnon, Greece
Anastasios Tzerachoglou
Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Georgia Cheirchanteri
Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Emmanouela Sfyroera
Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Eleni-Orsalia Sklavounou
Department of Industrial Design and Production Engineering, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece

Abstract

In the global retail market, there is a plethora of educational software: smartphone applications, computer programs, and websites with engaging educational activities that can be used at all levels of education: preschool, primary, secondary, tertiary, and especially in educational robotics and STEM education. However, a teacher or a parent faces a dilemma today: Which is the most educational and appropriate app for children to choose and use? This article aims to help parents, teachers, and other stakeholders in the education community. It has a double purpose: on the one hand, to present an evaluation rubric for educational apps, and on the other hand, to make use of it by offering the vital characteristics and the evaluation of well-known educational apps (n = 50) which can be downloaded from Google Play Store (https://play.google.com). Αpp selection was based on the following criteria: a) to be suitable for early childhood education (kindergarten), b) to cover a wide range of learning objectives (e.g. maths, music, visual arts, language, science, programming, history, and environment) and, c) to be free to download. The educational rubric used was a modified version adopted by literature research.

Keywords
educational apps, educational software, preschool education, Google Play

Article Details

How to Cite
Chatzopoulos, A., Karaflis, A., Kalogiannakis, M., Tzerachoglou, A., Cheirchanteri, G., Sfyroera, E., & Sklavounou, E.-O. (2023). Evaluation of Google Play educational apps for early childhood education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 770-778. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.004
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ali Ahmad, N. A. (2023). Digital disruption in early childhood education from teachers’ point of view: A qualitative research. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 671-681. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.016
  2. Antoniadi, G. (2023). Using an augmented reality application for teaching plant parts: A case study in 1$^{st$-grade primary school students. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 630-637. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.012
  3. Chatzopoulos, A., Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., Papoutsidakis, M., Elza, D., & Psycharis, S. (2021). DuBot: An Open-Source, Low-Cost Robot for STEM and Educational Robotics. In Research Anthology on Usage and Development of Open Source Software (pp. 329–353). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9158-1.ch018
  4. Chatzopoulos, A., Papoutsidakis, M., Kalogiannakis, M., & Psycharis, S. (2019). Action Research Implementation in Developing an Open Source and Low Cost Robotic Platform for STEM Education. International Journal of Computer Applications, 178(24), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019919039
  5. Chatzopoulos, A., Papoutsidakis, M., Kalogiannakis, M., Psycharis, S., & Papachristos, D. (2020). Measuring the impact on student’s Computational Thinking skills through STEM and Educational Robotics projects implementation. In M. Kalogiannakis & S. J. Papadakis (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking in P-12 Education (pp. 234–284). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4576-8
  6. Chau, C. L. (2014). Positive technological development for young children in the context of children's mobile apps (Doctoral dissertation, Tufts University).
  7. Haugland, S. W. (2000). Outstanding developmental software for 2000. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353276
  8. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721
  9. Larkin, K. (2013). Mathematics Education: Is There an App for That? In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (Proceedings of the 36th annual confrence of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia).
  10. Lee, C. Y., & Cherner, T. S. (2015). A comprehensive evaluation rubric for assessing instructional apps. Journal of Information Technology Education, 14(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.28945/2097
  11. McManis, L., & Parks, J. (2011). Evaluating Technology in Early Learners. Hatch Inc. https://www.eschoolnews.com
  12. Melissourgaki, P. (2022). Evaluation of educational applications in natural sciences. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 518–524. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2022.02.021
  13. Mercan, Z., Papadakis, S., Can Gözüm, A. İ., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2022). Examination of STEM parent awareness in the transition from preschool to primary school. Sustainability, 14(21), 14030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114030
  14. Meyer, M., Zosh, J. M., McLaren, C., Robb, M., McCaffery, H., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Radesky, J. (2021). How educational are “educational” apps for young children? App store content analysis using the Four Pillars of Learning framework. Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 526–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1882516
  15. Ok, M. W., Kim, M. K., Kang, E. Y., & Bryant, B. R. (2016). How to Find Good Apps: An Evaluation Rubric for Instructional Apps for Teaching Students With Learning Disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51(4), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451215589179
  16. Outhwaite, L. A., Early, E., Herodotou, C., & Van Herwegen, J. (2023). Understanding how educational maths apps can enhance learning: A content analysis and qualitative comparative analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, May, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13339
  17. Papadakis, S. (2020). Tools for evaluating educational apps for young children: a systematic review of the literature. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 18–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0127
  18. Papadakis, S., Alexandraki, F., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Greek parents’ app choices and young children’s smart mobile usage at home. In Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies and Learning (pp. 39-50). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  19. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Gözüm, A. I. C. (2022). STEM, STEAM, computational thinking, and coding: Evidence-based research and practice in children's development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1110476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1110476
  20. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Designing and creating an educational app rubric for preschool teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3147–3165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9579-0
  21. Pearson, M. J., Stephens, D., York, P., Armbrecht, T., Gunn, J. L. M., & Fruhling, Z. (2020). Debating the Use of Digital Devices in the Classroom. Resilient Educator. https://resilienteducator.com
  22. Petousi, V., & Sifaki, E. (2021). Contextualizing harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from discourse analysis of scientific publications. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23(3–4), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2020.10037655
  23. Pilar, R.-A., Jorge, A., & Cristina, C. (2013). The Use of Current Mobile Learning Applications in EFL. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.446
  24. SHARE, T. (2023). 5 Benefits of Using Cellphones in School: Smartphones as Learning Tools. Resilient Educator. https://resilienteducator.com
  25. Shoukry, L., Sturm, C., & Galal-Edeen, G. H. (2015). Pre-MEGa: A proposed framework for the design and evaluation of preschoolers’ mobile educational games. In Innovations and advances in computing, informatics, systems sciences, networking and engineering (pp. 385-390). Springer International Publishing.
  26. Strataki, A. (2022). An evaluation of educational apps for preschool-age children in Android and iOS. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2022.01.012
  27. Sunar, P. K., Dahal, N., & Pant, B. (2022). Using digital stories during COVID-19 to enhance early-grade learners’ language skills. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 548-561. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.003
  28. Susilawati, S., & Supriyatno, T. (2023). Problem-Based Learning model in improving critical thinking ability of elementary school students. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 638-647. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.013
  29. Uğraş, M., Zengin, E., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2023). Early Childhood Learning Losses during COVID-19: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076199
  30. Vaiopoulou, J., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., Kalogiannakis, M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2023). Classification and evaluation of educational apps for early childhood: Security matters. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2547-2578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11289-w
  31. Walker, H. (2011). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Apps for Mobile Devices. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341102600405
  32. Xezonaki, A. (2023). The use of Kahoot in preschool mathematics education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 648-657. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.014