Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Benefits and Challenges of AI in Higher Distance Education: Students’ Perceptions and Practices in Hellenic Open University (HOU)

Article Sidebar

Sample Demographics
Download PDF
Submitted   Jun 7, 2025
Published   Sep 10, 2025
Issue    Vol 5 No 2 (2025)
DOI   10.25082/AMLER.2025.02.011

Views

0

Downloads

0

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Apostolos Kostas
Department of Primary Education, University of the Aegean, 85132 Rhodes, Greece
Evangelia Manousou corresponding author
School of Humanities, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece

Abstract

This study explores postgraduate students' perceptions and practices regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in distance education at the Hellenic Open University (HOU). Conducted over two academic years (2023--24 and 2024--25), it examines students' familiarity with AI, perceived benefits and challenges, and opinions on ethical integration. Quantitative data were gathered via an online questionnaire from a sample of 373 students enrolled in two M.Sc. programmes. Results show that although students are somewhat familiar with AI, actual usage remains limited, mainly due to a lack of necessity, inadequate training, and institutional support. Those who use AI report benefits in research efficiency, time management, and feedback. However, concerns about reliability, academic integrity, and ethical ambiguity remain. Students strongly support establishing a regulatory framework, providing training for both students and educators, and modifying curricula to promote responsible use. The study underlines the importance of institutional preparedness and critical digital literacy as key factors for effective AI integration. Implications for educational practice, policy development, and future research are discussed, emphasising the need for a balanced, ethical, and pedagogically sound approach to AI in distance learning.

Keywords
artificial intelligence, generative AI, distance education, Hellenic Open University, technological innovation, ethical issues

Article Details

How to Cite
Kostas, A., & Manousou, E. (2025). Benefits and Challenges of AI in Higher Distance Education: Students’ Perceptions and Practices in Hellenic Open University (HOU). Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 5(2), 1560-1574. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2025.02.011
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Mihmas Mesfer Aldawsari, M., & Rashed Ibrahim Almohish, N. (2024). Threats and Opportunities of Students’ Use Of AI-Integrated Technology (ChatGPT) in Online Higher Education: Saudi Arabian Educational Technologists’ Perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7642
  2. Aldossary, A. S., Aljindi, A. A., & Alamri, J. M. (2024). The role of generative AI in education: Perceptions of Saudi students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep536. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15496
  3. Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. Q. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on Learning Motivation: Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
  4. Aydemir, H., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2024). Investigation of users’ opinions, perceptions and attitudes towards the use of artificial intelligence in online learning environments. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(s1), 70–92. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2024-0007
  5. Balabdaoui, F., Dittmann-Domenichini, N., Grosse, H., Schlienger, C., & Kortemeyer, G. (2024). A survey on students’ use of AI at a technical university. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00136-4
  6. Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
  7. Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y. H., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Dron, J., Stracke, C. M., Singh, L., Crompton, H., Koutropoulos, A., Terentev, E., Pazurek, A., Nichols, M., Sidorkin, A. M., Costello, E., Watson, S., Mulligan, D., Honeychurch, S., … Asino, T. I. (2024). The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI: A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future. Open Praxis, 16(4), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777
  8. Bozkurt, A., Uçar, H., & Koçdar, S. (2025). Mapping Minds in Motion: A Scholarly Voyage and Evaluation of Research Trends and Patterns in Open Praxis. Open Praxis, 17(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.896
  9. Capinding, A. T., & Dumayas, F. T. (2024). Transformative Pedagogy in the Digital Age: Unraveling the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education Students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(5), 630–657. Internet Archive. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.630
  10. Catalano, A. J. (2018). Measurements in Distance Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315229447
  11. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K.R.B. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge.
  13. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson.
  14. Duan, H., & Zhao, W. (2024). The Effects of Educational Artificial Intelligence-Powered Applications on Teachers’ Perceived Autonomy, Professional Development for Online Teaching, and Digital Burnout. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7659
  15. Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Özdemir, D., & Can, S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Bibliometric Study on Its Role in Transforming Teaching and Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7757
  16. Estrada-Molina, O., Mena, J., & López-Padrón, A. (2024). The Use of Deep Learning in Open Learning: A Systematic Review (2019 to 2023). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 370–393. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7756
  17. Filo, Y., Rabin, E., & Mor, Y. (2024). An Artificial Intelligence Competency Framework for Teachers and Students: Co-created With Teachers. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(s1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2024-0012
  18. Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Hijazi, R., Eliyahu, E., & Tal, A. (2024). Bridging the Divide: An Empirical Investigation of Artificial Intelligence and Generative Artificial Intelligence Integration Across Genders, Disciplines and Academic Roles. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(s1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2024-0008
  19. Clason, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing Data Measured By Individual Likert-Type Items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(4), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1994.04031
  20. Göçmez, L., & Okur, M. R. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Applications in Open and Distance Education: A Systematic Review of the Articles (2007-2021). Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1). https://www.asianjde.com
  21. Hajam, K. B., & Gahir, S. (2024). Unveiling the Attitudes of University Students Toward Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231225920
  22. Hanshaw, G., Vance, J., & Brewer, C. (2024). Exploring the Effectiveness of AI Course Assistants on the Student Learning Experience. Open Praxis, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.719
  23. Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
  24. He, Y. (2024). The Metaphor of AI in Writing in English: A Reflection on EFL Learners’ Motivation to Write, Enjoyment of Writing, Academic Buoyancy, and Academic Success in Writing. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7769
  25. Ibrahim, K., & Kirkpatrick, R. (2024). Potentials and Implications of ChatGPT for ESL Writing Instruction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7820
  26. Karataş, F., & Yüce, E. (2024). AI and the Future of Teaching: Preservice Teachers’ Reflections on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Open and Distributed Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7785
  27. Kohen-Vacs, D., Amzalag, M., Weigelt-Marom, H., Gal, L., Kahana, O., Raz-Fogel, N., Ben-Aharon, O., Reznik, N., Elnekave, M., & Usher, M. (2024). Towards a call for transformative practices in academia enhanced by generative AI. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(s1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2024-0006
  28. Kostas, A., Spanos, D., Tzortzoglou, F., & Sofos, A. (2024). Leveraging AI for personalized instruction in higher education: Initial findings for the LEADER AI project. In E. Varonis & A. Pyrini (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT in Education (ICICTE2024), Chania, Greece, 9-13 July 2024 (pp. 174-185). http://icicte.org/assets/13-kostas.pdf
  29. Kostas, A., Paraschou, V., Spanos, D., Tzortzoglou, F., & Sofos, A. (2025). AI and ChatGPT in Higher Education: Greek Students’ Perceived Practices, Benefits, and Challenges. Education Sciences, 15(5), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050605
  30. Lowenthal, P. R., Prokes, C., Lomellini, A., & Gasell, C. (2025). Investigating Faculty Perceptions of Creating and Enhancing Accessible Online Courses with Ally. Open Praxis, 17(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.759
  31. Ma, D., Akram, H., & Chen, H. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Students’ Behavioral Intentions and Attitudes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7703
  32. L’Enfant, J. (2024). AI as a reflective coach in graduate ESL practicum: activity theory insights into student-teacher development. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(s1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2024-0003
  33. Ossiannilsson, E., Ulloa Cazarez, R. L., Goode, C., Mansour, C., & Martins gomes de gusmão, C. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Use to Empower the Implementation of OER and the UNESCO OER Recommendation. Open Praxis, 16(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.650
  34. Ouyang, Z., Jiang, Y., & Liu, H. (2024). The Effects of Duolingo, an AI-Integrated Technology, on EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate and Engagement in Online Classes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7677
  35. Rampelt, F., Ruppert, R., Schleiss, J., Mah, D.-K., Bata, K., & Egloffstein, M. (2025). How Do AI Educators Use Open Educational Resources? A Cross-Sectoral Case Study on OER for AI Education. Open Praxis, 17(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.766
  36. Robson, C. (2010). Real-world research. A medium for social scientists and professional researchers. Gutenberg.
  37. Sevnarayan, K. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of ChatGPT: Students and lecturers perspectives at an open distance e-learning university. Journal of Pedagogical Research. LOCKSS. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202426525
  38. Serhan, D., & Welcome, N. (2024). Integrating ChatGPT in the Calculus Classroom: Student Perceptions. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 8(2), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.559
  39. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  40. Wu, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). “To Use or Not to Use?” A Mixed-Methods Study on the Determinants of EFL College Learners’ Behavioral Intention to Use AI in the Distributed Learning Context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7708
  41. Ullmann, T. D., Edwards, C., Bektik, D., Herodotou, C., & Whitelock, D. (2024). Towards Generative AI for Course Content Production: Expert Reflections. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(s1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2024-0013
  42. Yang, H.-H. (2024). The Acceptance of AI Tools Among Design Professionals: Exploring the Moderating Role of Job Replacement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7811